From research to the textbookAssessing speech acts representation in course book series for students of English as an L2

  1. Lorena Pérez-Hernández
Revista:
Revista española de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 0213-2028

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 32

Número: 1

Páginas: 248-276

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1075/RESLA.17024.PER DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de lingüística aplicada

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Postprint lockAcceso abierto Editor

Información de financiación

This work was supported by grant nº FFI2017-82730-P (Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness?.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aksoyalp, Y. , & Toprak, T. E. (2015) Incorporating pragmatics in English language teaching: to what extent do EFL course book address speech acts?International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English literature, 4(2), 125–133.
  • Austin, J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Baicchi, A. (2015) Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (1), 106–139. doi:  10.1075/rcl.13.1.05bai https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.1.05bai
  • Barron, A. (2007, March). ‘Can you take the other bed, please?’: An appraisal of request presentation in EFL textbooks. Paper presented at the22nd Congress of the German Society for Foreign (and Second) Language Research, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
  • Boxer, D. , & Pickering, L. (1995) Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints. ELT Journal, 49(1), 44–58. doi:  10.1093/elt/49.1.44 https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.1.44
  • Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, MA: Chicago Press University. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  • Carroll, D. (2011) Teaching preference organization: Learning how not to say ‘no’. In N. Houck & D. Tatsuki (Eds.), Pragmatics: Teaching natural conversation (pp.105–118). Alexandria: TESOL.
  • Del Campo, N. (2013) Illocutionary constructions in English: Cognitive motivation and linguistic realization. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.
  • Diepenbroek, L. G. , & Derwing, T. M. (2014) To what extent do popular ESL textbooks incorporate oral fluency and pragmatic development?TESL Canada Journal, 30(7), 1–20. doi:  10.18806/tesl.v30i7.1149 https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v30i7.1149
  • Dik, S. C. (1989) The theory of Functional Grammar: Part I: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.
  • (1997) The theory of Functional Grammar: Part II: Complex and derived constructions. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110218374 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218374
  • Gibbs, R. W. (1984) Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 265–304. doi:  10.1207/s15516709cog0803_4 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0803_4
  • Gibbs, R. W. (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, MA: Chicago Press University.
  • Givón, T. (1989) Mind, code, and context. Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Glaser, K. (2009) Acquiring pragmatic competence in a foreign language – mastering dispreferred speech acts. Topics in Linguistics, 4, 50–57.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1994[1985]) An introduction to Functional Grammar. London, England: Edward Arnold.
  • Leech, G. (1983) Principles of pragmatics. New York, NY: Longman.
  • Levinson, S. C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313
  • Limberg, H. (2015) Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input. Language Teaching Research, 20(6), 700–718. doi:  10.1177/1362168815590695 https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815590695
  • LoCastro, V. (2012) Pragmatics for language educators. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Moradi, A. , Karbalaei, A. , & Afraz, S. (2013) A textbook evaluation of speech acts and language functions in high school English textbooks (I, II and III) and Interchange Series, Books I, II, and III. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 323–335.
  • Nguyen, T. T. M. (2011) Learning to communicate in a globalized world: To what extent do school textbooks facilitate the development of intercultural pragmatic competence?RELC Journal, 42(1), 17–30. 10.1177/0033688210390265 https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210390265
  • Panther, K.-U. , & Thornburg, L. (1998) A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 755–769. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00028‑9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00028-9
  • (2005) Motivation and convention in some speech act constructions: a cognitive-linguistic approach. In S. Marmaridou , K. Nikiforidou & E. Antonopoulou (Eds.), Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century (pp.53–76). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110920826.53 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110920826.53
  • Pérez-Hernández, L. (1996) The cognition of requests. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 4, 189–208.
  • Pérez-Hernández, L. (1999) Grounding politeness. Journal of English Studies1, 209–236. 10.18172/jes.53 https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.53
  • Pérez-Hernández, L. (2001a) Illocution and Cognition: A Constructional Approach. Logroño: Servicio de Publicaciones Universidad de La Rioja.
  • Pérez-Hernández, L. (2001b) The directive-commissive continuum. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 23, 77–98.
  • Pérez-Hernández, L. (2009) Análisis léxico-construccional de verbos de habla. Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación, 40, 62–92.
  • Pérez-Hernández, L. (2012) Saying something for a particular purpose: Constructional compatibility and constructional families. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 25, 189–210.
  • Pérez-Hernández, L. (2013) Illocutionary constructions: (Multiple source)-in-target metonymies, illocutionary ICMs, and specification links. Language & Communication, 33(2), 128–149. 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.02.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.02.001
  • Pérez-Hernández, L. , & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2002) Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(3), 259–284. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)80002‑9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)80002-9
  • Pérez-Hernández, L. , & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2011) A Lexical-Constructional Model Account of Illocution. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 98–137.
  • Petraki, E. , & Bayes, S. (2013) Teaching oral requests: an evaluation of five English as second language coursebooks. Pragmatics, 23(3), 499–517. 10.1075/prag.23.3.06pet https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.3.06pet
  • Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
  • Searle, J. R. (1979) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In J. R. Searle (Ed.), Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts (pp.1–29). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511609213.003 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213.003
  • Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005) (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1(1), 95–119.
  • Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008) Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory. London: Continuum.
  • Takahashi, H. (2012) A cognitive linguistic analysis of the English imperative. With special reference to Japanese imperatives. Amsterdam, Holland: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.35 https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.35
  • Ulum, O. G. (2015) Pragmatic elements in EFL course books. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science, 1, 93–106.
  • Valenzuela, J. , & Rojo, A. M. (2008) What can language learners can tell us about constructions?In S. De Knop & T. De Ruyker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp.259–294). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110205381.2.197 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110205381.2.197
  • Vanparys, J. (1996) Categories and complements of illocutionary verbs in a cognitive perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  • Vellenga, H. (2004) Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely?TESL-EJ, 8(2), 1–18.
  • Verschueren, J. (1985) What people say they do with words: prolegomena to an empirical-conceptual approach to linguistic action. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Waara, R. (2004) Construal, convention and constructions in L2 speech. In M. Achard , & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp.52–75). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110199857.51 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857.51
  • Wong, J. (2001) ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40, 37–60.