Patentes verdes en el sector manufacturero: El impacto de los recursos y las capacidades de las empresas

  1. Sabina Scarpellini 1
  2. Pilar Portillo-Tarragona 1
  3. Luz María Marín-vinuesa 2
  4. José M. Moneva 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Universia Business Review

ISSN: 1698-5117

Año de publicación: 2017

Número: 56

Páginas: 18-35

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N4.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Universia Business Review

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

Este artículo proporciona a los profesionales un análisis de empresas con patentes verdes del sector manufacturero, relacionando las características económico-financieras de las empresas con el número de sus patentes verdes nacionales y Europeas. En particular se analiza la relación entre la colaboración con centros de I+D y la posesión de patentes verdes. Los resultados, obtenido a través de una base de datos ad hoc de 1606 empresas españolas, indican que la capacidad colaborativa para la investigación y el desarrollo (I+D) proporciona una útil explicación de la tenencia de patentes verdes en las empresas manufactureras españolas. Además, la performance financiera de las empresas, su antigüedad y tamaño, se consideran relevantes para el desarrollo de patentes verdes.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

1. Acknowledgements: This research study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, “Reco-inno” project, ref. ECO2013-45599-R. We acknowledge particularly the support of CIRCE Foundation – Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption www.fcirce.es– for the project development and we thank Clara Sarasa for her contribution to the empirical study. 2. Corresponding author: Department of Accounting and Finance and CIRCE Research Institute; University of Zaragoza; Circe Building Campus Río Ebro; University of Zaragoza; Mariano Esquillor Gómez, 18; 50015 Zaragoza; (Spain) 3. See Eco-Innovation Observatory: www.eco-innovation.eu/ (accessed May 2017).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aragon-Correa, J.A., Leyva-de la Hiz, D.I., 2016. The Influence of Technology Differences on Corporate Environmental Patents: A Resource-Based Versus an Institutional View of Green Innovations. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 25, 421–434. doi:10.1002/bse.1885
  • Barge-Gil, A., López, A., 2014. R&D determinants: Accounting for the differences between research and development. Res. Policy 43, 1634–1648. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.017
  • Cruz-Cázares, C., Bayona-Sáez, C., García-Marco, T., 2013. You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency. Res. Policy 42, 1239–1250. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012
  • Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á., Sáez-Martínez, F.J., 2015. Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innov. Manag. Policy Pract. 17, 6–23. doi:10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060
  • Doran, J., Ryan, G., 2012. Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 15, 421–441. doi:10.1108/14601060410515646
  • European Commission, 2016. Flash Eurobarometer 441 marketplaces and search engines by SMEs Fieldwork April 2016 June 2016 Survey requested by the European Commission , Flash Eurobarometer 439 Report The use of online marketplaces and search engines by SMEs.
  • González-Benito, J., Lannelongue, G., Ferreira, L.M., Gonzalez-Zapatero, C., 2016. The effect of green purchasing on purchasing performance: the moderating role played by long-term relationships and strategic integration. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 31, 312–324. doi:10.1108/JBIM-09-2014-0188
  • Halila, F., Rundquist, J., 2011. The development and market success of eco-innovations: A comparative study of eco-innovations and “other” innovations in Sweden. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 14, 278–302. doi:10.1108/14601061111148807
  • Hall, B.H., Ziedonis, R.H., 2001. The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industriy, 1979-1995. J. Econ. 32, 101–128. doi:10.2307/2696400
  • Henriques, I., Sharma, S., 2005. Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian forestry industry. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 14, 384–398. doi:10.1002/bse.456
  • Horbach, J., 2016. Empirical determinants of eco-innovation in European countries using the community innovation survey. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 19. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.005
  • Jensen, M., Roy, A., 2008. Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Manag. J. 51, 495–516. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.32625985
  • Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., Popp, D., 2010. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45, 133–155. doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
  • Keupp, M.M., Palmié, M., Gassmann, O., 2012. The Strategic Management of Innovation: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 14, 367–390. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x
  • Kobayashi, H., Kato, M., Maezawa, Y., Sano, K., 2011. An R&D management framework for eco-technology. Sustainability 3, 1282–1301. doi:10.3390/su3081282
  • Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., Groen, A.J., 2010. The RBV: a Review and Assessment of its Critiques. J. Manage. 36, 349–372. doi:10.1177/0149206309350775
  • Lee, K.H., Min, B., 2015. Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 534–542. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114
  • Leitner, A., Wehrmeyer, W., France, C., 2010. Management Research Review The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understanding. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 33, 1022–1041.
  • Machiba, T., 2010. Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: Development of an analytical framework and preliminary analysis of industry and policy practices. Int. Econ. Econ. Policy 7, 357–370. doi:10.1007/s10368-010-0171-y
  • Marin, G., 2014. Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Res. Policy 43, 301–317. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.015
  • Mortazavi Ravari, S.S., Mehrabanfar, E., Banaitis, A., Banaitienė, N., 2016. Framework for assessing technological innovation capability in research and technology organizations. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 17, 825–847. doi:10.3846/16111699.2016.1253607
  • OECD, 2015. Environment at a Glance 2000: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2013-en
  • OECD, 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3a. ed. OECD publishing, Paris.
  • Paraschiv, D.M., Voicu-Dorobantu, R., Langa(Olaru), C., Laura Nemoianu, E., 2012. New models in support of the eco-innovative capacity of companies - A theoretical approach. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 5.
  • Peiró-Signes, Á., Segarra-Oña, M. del V., Miret-Pastor, L., Verma, R., 2011. Eco-innovation attitude and industry’s technological level - an important key for promoting efficient vertical policies. Environ. Eng. Manag. J.
  • Porter, M.E., Van der Linde, C., 1995. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv. Bus. Rev. 73, 120–134.
  • Potocan, V., Nedelko, Z., Peleckienė, V., Peleckis, K., 2016. Values, environmental concern and economic concern as predictors of enterprise environmental responsiveness. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 17, 685–700. doi:10.3846/16111699.2016.1202315
  • Przychodzen, J., Przychodzen, W., 2015. Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance - Evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. J. Clean. Prod. 90, 253–263. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.034
  • Rennings, K., 2000. Redefining innovation - Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 32, 319–332. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
  • Revell, A., Rutherfoord, R., 2003. UK environmental policy and the small firm: Broadening the focus. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 12, 26–35. doi:10.1002/bse.347
  • Scarpellini, S., Aranda, A., Aranda, J., Llera, E., Marco, M., 2012. R&D and eco-innovation: Opportunities for closer collaboration between universities and companies through technology centers. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 14, 1047–1058. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0514-1
  • Scarpellini, S., Valero-Gil, J., Portillo-Tarragona, P., 2016. The “economic-finance interface” for eco-innovation projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 1012–1025. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.005
  • Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., Fritsch, M., Günther, J., 2012. What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? - Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation 32, 358–369. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.004
  • Segarra-Ona, M., Peiro-Signes, A., Paya-Martinez, A., 2014. Factors Influencing Automobile Firms’ Eco-Innovation Orientation. Emj-Engineering Manag. J. 26. doi:10.1080/10429247.2014.11432002
  • Segarra-Oña, M.-V., Peiró-Signes, Á., Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., Vargas-Vargas, M., 2014. Service vs. manufacturing: how to address more effectively eco-innovation public policies by disentangling the different characteristics of industries. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 27. doi:10.1080/13511610.2013.863705
  • Teirlinck, P., Spithoven, A., 2013. Formal R&D management and strategic decision making in small firms in business services. R&D Manag. 43, 37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00701.x
  • Tessitore, S., Daddi, T., Iraldo, F., 2010. Eco-innovation and economic performance in industrial clusters: Evidence from Italy. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 42, 1487–1493.
  • Valero-Gil, J., Scarpellini, S., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Rivera-Torres, P., 2017. Environment and innovation in spanish business : bridging the gap between academics and practitioners. Universia Bus. Rev. 54, 90–109. doi:10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N2.03
  • van Dongen, P., Winnink, J., Tijssen, R., 2014. Academic inventions and patents in the Netherlands: A case study on business sector exploitation. World Pat. Inf. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2014.03.002
  • Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B., 1997. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strateg. Manag. J. 18, 303–319. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.3.CO;2-7
  • Wagner, M., 2007. On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 36, 1587–1602. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet