Patentes verdes en el sector manufacturero: El impacto de los recursos y las capacidades de las empresas

  1. Sabina Scarpellini 1
  2. Pilar Portillo-Tarragona 1
  3. Luz María Marín-vinuesa 2
  4. José M. Moneva 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Universia Business Review

ISSN: 1698-5117

Ano de publicación: 2017

Número: 56

Páxinas: 18-35

Tipo: Artigo

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N4.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Universia Business Review

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso aberto Editor

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

This paper, which is of interest to practitioners, will analyse companies in the manufacturing sector that hold Spanish and European environmental patents, linking the registered green patents with the economic and financial characteristics of the companies. Specifically, the relationship between green patents and the collaboration of companies with research and development (R&D) centres is analysed. The results of surveying an ad-hoc database comprising 1606 Spanish companies indicate that the ways in which the companies collaborate with R&D organisations can shed light on green patent holdings in the Spanish manufacturing companies. Moreover, the authors find that financial performance, age, and size are all significant factors in the development of green patents.

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

1. Acknowledgements: This research study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, “Reco-inno” project, ref. ECO2013-45599-R. We acknowledge particularly the support of CIRCE Foundation – Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption www.fcirce.es– for the project development and we thank Clara Sarasa for her contribution to the empirical study. 2. Corresponding author: Department of Accounting and Finance and CIRCE Research Institute; University of Zaragoza; Circe Building Campus Río Ebro; University of Zaragoza; Mariano Esquillor Gómez, 18; 50015 Zaragoza; (Spain) 3. See Eco-Innovation Observatory: www.eco-innovation.eu/ (accessed May 2017).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aragon-Correa, J.A., Leyva-de la Hiz, D.I., 2016. The Influence of Technology Differences on Corporate Environmental Patents: A Resource-Based Versus an Institutional View of Green Innovations. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 25, 421–434. doi:10.1002/bse.1885
  • Barge-Gil, A., López, A., 2014. R&D determinants: Accounting for the differences between research and development. Res. Policy 43, 1634–1648. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.017
  • Cruz-Cázares, C., Bayona-Sáez, C., García-Marco, T., 2013. You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency. Res. Policy 42, 1239–1250. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012
  • Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á., Sáez-Martínez, F.J., 2015. Eco-innovation: Insights from a literature review. Innov. Manag. Policy Pract. 17, 6–23. doi:10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060
  • Doran, J., Ryan, G., 2012. Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 15, 421–441. doi:10.1108/14601060410515646
  • European Commission, 2016. Flash Eurobarometer 441 marketplaces and search engines by SMEs Fieldwork April 2016 June 2016 Survey requested by the European Commission , Flash Eurobarometer 439 Report The use of online marketplaces and search engines by SMEs.
  • González-Benito, J., Lannelongue, G., Ferreira, L.M., Gonzalez-Zapatero, C., 2016. The effect of green purchasing on purchasing performance: the moderating role played by long-term relationships and strategic integration. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 31, 312–324. doi:10.1108/JBIM-09-2014-0188
  • Halila, F., Rundquist, J., 2011. The development and market success of eco-innovations: A comparative study of eco-innovations and “other” innovations in Sweden. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 14, 278–302. doi:10.1108/14601061111148807
  • Hall, B.H., Ziedonis, R.H., 2001. The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industriy, 1979-1995. J. Econ. 32, 101–128. doi:10.2307/2696400
  • Henriques, I., Sharma, S., 2005. Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian forestry industry. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 14, 384–398. doi:10.1002/bse.456
  • Horbach, J., 2016. Empirical determinants of eco-innovation in European countries using the community innovation survey. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 19. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.005
  • Jensen, M., Roy, A., 2008. Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Manag. J. 51, 495–516. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.32625985
  • Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., Popp, D., 2010. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45, 133–155. doi:10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1
  • Keupp, M.M., Palmié, M., Gassmann, O., 2012. The Strategic Management of Innovation: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 14, 367–390. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x
  • Kobayashi, H., Kato, M., Maezawa, Y., Sano, K., 2011. An R&D management framework for eco-technology. Sustainability 3, 1282–1301. doi:10.3390/su3081282
  • Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., Groen, A.J., 2010. The RBV: a Review and Assessment of its Critiques. J. Manage. 36, 349–372. doi:10.1177/0149206309350775
  • Lee, K.H., Min, B., 2015. Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 534–542. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114
  • Leitner, A., Wehrmeyer, W., France, C., 2010. Management Research Review The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understanding. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 33, 1022–1041.
  • Machiba, T., 2010. Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: Development of an analytical framework and preliminary analysis of industry and policy practices. Int. Econ. Econ. Policy 7, 357–370. doi:10.1007/s10368-010-0171-y
  • Marin, G., 2014. Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Res. Policy 43, 301–317. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.015
  • Mortazavi Ravari, S.S., Mehrabanfar, E., Banaitis, A., Banaitienė, N., 2016. Framework for assessing technological innovation capability in research and technology organizations. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 17, 825–847. doi:10.3846/16111699.2016.1253607
  • OECD, 2015. Environment at a Glance 2000: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2013-en
  • OECD, 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3a. ed. OECD publishing, Paris.
  • Paraschiv, D.M., Voicu-Dorobantu, R., Langa(Olaru), C., Laura Nemoianu, E., 2012. New models in support of the eco-innovative capacity of companies - A theoretical approach. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 5.
  • Peiró-Signes, Á., Segarra-Oña, M. del V., Miret-Pastor, L., Verma, R., 2011. Eco-innovation attitude and industry’s technological level - an important key for promoting efficient vertical policies. Environ. Eng. Manag. J.
  • Porter, M.E., Van der Linde, C., 1995. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv. Bus. Rev. 73, 120–134.
  • Potocan, V., Nedelko, Z., Peleckienė, V., Peleckis, K., 2016. Values, environmental concern and economic concern as predictors of enterprise environmental responsiveness. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 17, 685–700. doi:10.3846/16111699.2016.1202315
  • Przychodzen, J., Przychodzen, W., 2015. Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance - Evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. J. Clean. Prod. 90, 253–263. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.034
  • Rennings, K., 2000. Redefining innovation - Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 32, 319–332. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
  • Revell, A., Rutherfoord, R., 2003. UK environmental policy and the small firm: Broadening the focus. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 12, 26–35. doi:10.1002/bse.347
  • Scarpellini, S., Aranda, A., Aranda, J., Llera, E., Marco, M., 2012. R&D and eco-innovation: Opportunities for closer collaboration between universities and companies through technology centers. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 14, 1047–1058. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0514-1
  • Scarpellini, S., Valero-Gil, J., Portillo-Tarragona, P., 2016. The “economic-finance interface” for eco-innovation projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 1012–1025. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.005
  • Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., Fritsch, M., Günther, J., 2012. What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? - Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation 32, 358–369. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.004
  • Segarra-Ona, M., Peiro-Signes, A., Paya-Martinez, A., 2014. Factors Influencing Automobile Firms’ Eco-Innovation Orientation. Emj-Engineering Manag. J. 26. doi:10.1080/10429247.2014.11432002
  • Segarra-Oña, M.-V., Peiró-Signes, Á., Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., Vargas-Vargas, M., 2014. Service vs. manufacturing: how to address more effectively eco-innovation public policies by disentangling the different characteristics of industries. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 27. doi:10.1080/13511610.2013.863705
  • Teirlinck, P., Spithoven, A., 2013. Formal R&D management and strategic decision making in small firms in business services. R&D Manag. 43, 37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00701.x
  • Tessitore, S., Daddi, T., Iraldo, F., 2010. Eco-innovation and economic performance in industrial clusters: Evidence from Italy. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 42, 1487–1493.
  • Valero-Gil, J., Scarpellini, S., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Rivera-Torres, P., 2017. Environment and innovation in spanish business : bridging the gap between academics and practitioners. Universia Bus. Rev. 54, 90–109. doi:10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N2.03
  • van Dongen, P., Winnink, J., Tijssen, R., 2014. Academic inventions and patents in the Netherlands: A case study on business sector exploitation. World Pat. Inf. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2014.03.002
  • Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B., 1997. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strateg. Manag. J. 18, 303–319. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.3.CO;2-7
  • Wagner, M., 2007. On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 36, 1587–1602. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004
Fonte de datos: Dialnet