Low productivity indexesthe Old English verbal suffixes "-etan" and "-laecan"

  1. Maíz Villalta, Gema
Revue:
Revista española de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 0213-2028

Année de publication: 2012

Volumen: 25

Pages: 117-132

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: Revista española de lingüística aplicada

Dépôt institutionnel: lock_openAccès ouvert Editor

Références bibliographiques

  • Aronoff, M. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Baayen, H. 1989. A Corpus-Based Approach to Morphological Productivity. Doctoral dissertation. Free University of Amsterdam.
  • Baayen, H. 1992. “Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity”. Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109-149.
  • Baayen, H. 1993. “On frequency, transparency and productivity”. Yearbook of Morphology 1992. Eds. G. Booij and J. van Marle. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 181-208.
  • Baayen, H. and R. Lieber. 1991. “Productivity and English derivation: a corpus-based study”. Linguistics 29, 801-843.
  • Baayen, H. and A. Renouf. 1996. “Chronicling The Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper”. Language 72, 69-96.
  • Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Bauer, L. 2004. A Glossary of Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Bauer, L. 2005. “Productivity: Theories”. Handbook of Word-Formation 2005. Eds. P. Stekauer, and R. Lieber. Springer.
  • Bosworth, J. and T. N. Toller. 1973 (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark Hall, J. R. 1996 (1896). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Fernández-Domínguez, J., Díaz-Negrillo, A. and P. Štekauer. 2007. “How is low morphological productivity measured?”. Atlantis 29 (1): 29-54.
  • Healey, A., ed., with J. Price Wilkin and X. Xiang. 2004. The Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto. [available online in http://tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus/]
  • Jember, G. K. et al. 1975. English-Old English, Old English-English Dictionary. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Kastovsky, D. 1986. “Deverbal nouns in Old and Modern English: from stem-formation to word-formation”. Historical Semantics-Historical Word Formation. Ed. J. Fisiak. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 221-261.
  • Kastovsky, D. 1989. “Typological changes in the history of English morphology”. Meaning and Beyond. Ernst Leisi zum 70. Geburstag. Eds. U. Fries and M. Heusser. Tübingen. 281-293.
  • Kastovsky, D. 1990. “The typological status of Old English word formation”. Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Eds. S. Adamson, V. Law, N. Vincent and S. Wright. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 205-224.
  • Kastovsky, D. 1992. “Semantics and vocabulary”. The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066. Ed. R. Hogg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 290-408.
  • Kastovsky, D. 2005. “Conversion and/or zero: word-formation theory, historical linguistics, and typology”. Approaches to Conversion/Zero Derivation. Eds. L. Bauer and S. Varela. Münster: Waxmann. 31-50.
  • Kastovsky, D. 2006. “Typological changes in derivational morphology”. The Handbook of The History of English. Eds. A. Van Kemenade and B. Los. Oxford: Blackwell. 151-177.
  • Lass, R. 1994. Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maíz Villata, G. fc.
  • Marckwardt, A. H. 1942. “The verbal suffix -ettan in Old English”. Language 18: 275-281.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2008. “Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology”. Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Ed. R. Van Valin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 119-145.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2009. “A typology of morphological constructions”. Deconstructing Constructions. Eds. C. Butler and J. Martín Arista. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 85-115.
  • Martín Arista, J. et al. 2009. Nerthus: An Online Lexical database of Old English. [Available online in http://www.nerthusproject.com].
  • Martín Arista, J. 2010a. “OE strong verbs derived from strong verbs”. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7 (1): 36-56.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2010b. “Lexical negation in Old English”. NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution 60/61: 89-108.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2010c. “Building a lexical database of Old English: issues and landmarks”. Current Projects in Historical Lexicography. Ed. J. Considine. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 1-33.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2011a. “Projections and constructions in functional morphology: The case of Old English HRĒOW”. Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 393-245.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2011b. “Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English”. English Studies 92 (3): 323-344.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2011c. “Morphological relatedness and zero alternation in Old English”. Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. Eds. C. Butler and P. Guerrero Medina. London: Equinox.
  • Martín Arista, Javier. fc a. “Parasynthesis in Old English word-formation”.
  • Martín Arista, J. fc b. “Old English lexical primes: Corpus analysis and database compilation”. Creation and Use of Historical Linguistic Corpora in Spain. Ed. N. Vázquez. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
  • Martín Arista, J. fc c. “The Old English prefix ge-: A panchronic reappraisal”.
  • Mateo Mendaza, R. fc a. “The Old English adjectival suffixes -cund and -isc: textual occurrences and productivity”.
  • Mateo Mendaza, R. fc b. “The Old English adjectival affixes -ful and ful-: a text-based account on productivity”.
  • Plag, I. 1999. Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Quirk, R. and C. L. Wrenn. 1994. An Old English Grammar. London: Methuen.
  • Štekauer, P. 2005. Meaning Predictability in Word-formation: Novel, Context-Free Naming Units. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Sweet, H. 1976 (1896). The Student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.