Determination of fungicide pyrimethanil in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine
- Vaquero-Fernández, L. 1
- Sanz-Asensio, J. 1
- Fernández-Zurbano, P. 12
- López-Alonso, M. 1
- Martínez-Soria, M.-T. 1
-
1
Universidad de La Rioja
info
-
2
Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino
info
ISSN: 0022-5142
Year of publication: 2013
Volume: 93
Issue: 8
Pages: 1960-1966
Type: Article
More publications in: Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Metrics
JCR (Journal Impact Factor)
- Year 2013
- Journal Impact Factor: 1.879
- Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 1.765
- Article influence score: 0.49
- Best Quartile: Q1
- Area: AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 7/56 (Ranking edition: SCIE)
- Area: FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 41/123 (Ranking edition: SCIE)
- Area: CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 25/71 (Ranking edition: SCIE)
SCImago Journal Rank
- Year 2013
- SJR Journal Impact: 0.852
- Best Quartile: Q1
- Area: Food Science Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 49/298
- Area: Agronomy and Crop Science Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 50/345
- Area: Biotechnology Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 77/289
- Area: Nutrition and Dietetics Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 48/124
Scopus CiteScore
- Year 2013
- CiteScore of the Journal : 3.4
- Area: Agronomy and Crop Science Percentile: 84
- Area: Food Science Percentile: 81
- Area: Biotechnology Percentile: 64
- Area: Medicine (all) Percentile: 59
- Area: Nutrition and Dietetics Percentile: 56
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study determined the evolution of pyrimethanil, a fungicide commonly used to control Botrytis cinerea, throughout the winemaking process in grapes, must, fermenting must and wine. Tempranillo grapevines were treated with pyrimethanil according to both good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Critical Agricultural Practices (CAP). Fermentation was carried out in an experimental winery. Grape analysis was based on an ethyl acetate extraction method. Samples from fermentation were analysed by solid phase extraction. The determination was carried out by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection (GC-NPD) and additionally confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). RESULTS: Pyrimethanil residues were at least ten times greater in grapes treated 7 days before harvest than in those treated respecting the safety period (21 days). The amount of pyrimethanil in grapes treated under GAP was below the maximum residue limit (5 mg kg-1). The level of pyrimethanil decreased during fermentation in both treatments. In the fermentation of grapes treated according to CAP, the pyrimethanil concentration was reduced by over 50% on the first day and then remained constant until the end of the fermentation process. For grapes treated in compliance with GAP, the amount of pyrimethanil decreased to a level below the limit of detection in the bottled wine. CONCLUSION: The described methods for grapes, must, fermenting must and wine gave good recoveries, linearity, precision and accuracy. They were also highly sensitive in avoiding matrix effects. Pyrimethanil residues found in treated grapes were higher in skin than in pulp. The amount of pyrimethanil decreased during fermentation by degradation and/or adsorption. For grapes treated according to GAP, residues disappeared in the final bottled wine. The decrease observed in the final bottled wine may be caused by diverse oenological practices and technologies such us malolactic fermentation, racking and settling. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry.