Schizotypal traits in adolescents with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: validity, reliability and risk for psychosis

  1. Fonseca-Pedrero, E. 124
  2. Debbané, M. 35
  3. Schneider, M. 3
  4. Badoud, D. 3
  5. Eliez, S. 3
  1. 1 Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental
    info

    Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/009byq155

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

  3. 3 Université de Genève
    info

    Université de Genève

    Ginebra, Suiza

    ROR https://ror.org/01swzsf04

  4. 4 Prevention Program for Psychosis (P3), Cantabria, Spain
  5. 5 University College London
    info

    University College London

    Londres, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/02jx3x895

Revista:
Psychological Medicine

ISSN: 0033-2917

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 46

Número: 5

Páginas: 1005-1013

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/S0033291715002500 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-84949815694 WoS: WOS:000371620700010 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Psychological Medicine

Resumen

Background: Very little is known about the phenotypic expression of schizotypal traits in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS). The main purpose was to analyse the factorial structure, internal consistency and temporal stability of schizotypal traits, as well as their associations with prodromal states and clinical psychotic symptoms in adolescents with 22q11DS. Method: The sample comprised 61 adolescents with 22q11DS (mean = 14.95 years, s.d. = 2.13; n = 24 at follow-up). An age-matched comparison group (n = 61, mean = 15.44 years, s.d. = 1.76) was also included. The Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ), the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale were used. Results: Adolescents with 22q11DS scored higher than the control group on the interpersonal dimension and suspiciousness subscale of the SPQ. The analysis of the internal structure of the SPQ in the sample of 22q11DS participants yielded a three-component solution (cognitive–perceptual, interpersonal, and disorganized). In addition, internal consistency coefficients ranged between 0.63 and 0.91. The schizotypal traits were highly stable across a 3.6-year interval, and ranged from 0.50 to 0.63. Self-reported schizotypal traits correlated with interview-based ratings of prodromal states and psychotic symptoms. Conclusions: These results indicate that the SPQ may be a valid tool to assess schizotypal traits in adolescents with 22q11DS. The identification of a reliable self-report instrument for use in individuals with learning disabilities and at genetic high risk for psychosis could be useful in clinical and research settings. Assessment of schizotypal traits may be used as a distal risk marker and in a close-in strategy in high-risk genetic samples to enhance the possibility of early detection of psychosis. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015