Motivation and L2 Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge of Spanish EFL Students at the Official School of Languages

  1. Andrés Canga Alonso 1
  2. Almudena Fernández Fontecha 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    GRID grid.119021.a

Miscelánea: A journal of english and american studies

ISSN: 1137-6368

Año de publicación: 2014

Número: 49

Páginas: 13-28

Tipo: Artículo

Exportar: RIS


Citas recibidas

  • Citas en Scopus: 2 (20-09-2021)
  • Citas en Dialnet Métricas: 3 (17-09-2021)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Año 2014
  • Impacto SJR de la revista: 0.103
  • Cuartil mayor: Q3
  • Área: Cultural Studies Cuartil: Q3 Posición en el área: 592/891
  • Área: Language and Linguistics Cuartil: Q3 Posición en el área: 500/737
  • Área: Literature and Literary Theory Cuartil: Q3 Posición en el área: 363/744
  • Área: Linguistics and Language Cuartil: Q3 Posición en el área: 520/756


  • Ciencias Sociales: B
  • Ciencias Humanas: B


  • Año 2014
  • CiteScore de la revista: 0.0
  • Área: Literature and Literary Theory Percentil: 25
  • Área: Language and Linguistics Percentil: 12
  • Área: Cultural Studies Percentil: 12
  • Área: Linguistics and Language Percentil: 12


This study explores the relationship between the motivation and receptive vocabulary knowledge of a group of 30 EFL students in the 1st and 2nd year of the Official School of Languages intermediate level (B1) (Escuela Oficial de Idiomas - EOI). We measured their receptive vocabulary by means of the 2,000-word frequency-band from the receptive version of the VLT (2K VLT) (Schmitt, Schmitt and Clapham 2001, version 2). On the other hand, an adaptation of Gardner’s (1985) A/MTB questionnaire was used to analyse motivational levels. On a three-level scale to range learners' motivation marks, i.e. high motivation, medium motivation, low motivation, our results evince most learners' were highly motivated in the two years (level 3) and the rest were motivated (level 2). As could be expected in this type of language teaching, no lowly motivated learners were identified. Concerning the types of motivation, extrinsic motivation was higher than intrinsic motivation in both years. The evolution of general motivation and the two types, extrinsic and intrinsic, is not significant from the 1st to the 2nd year. Both the general motivation and the intrinsic type decrease slightly from one year to the following one. As for students’ receptive vocabulary knowledge, it increased significantly from the 1st to the 2nd year. Finally, no significant correlation was detected between this type of vocabulary and learners’ levels of general intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.