A preliminary study on motivation and gender in CLIL and non-CLIL types of instruction

  1. Almudena Fernández Fontecha 1
  2. Andrés Canga Alonso 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Filologías Modernas, C/San José de Calasanz, 33, 26004 Logroño (La-Rioja), Spain
Journal:
IJES, International Journal of English Studies

ISSN: 1578-7044

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 14

Issue: 1

Pages: 27-48

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/IJES/14/1/156681 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: IJES, International Journal of English Studies

Metrics

Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 26 (04-03-2023)
  • Dialnet Metrics Cited by: 13 (24-02-2023)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2014
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.26
  • Best Quartile: Q1
  • Area: Literature and Literary Theory Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 46/749
  • Area: Cultural Studies Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 171/907
  • Area: Linguistics and Language Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 251/822
  • Area: Education Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 596/1251

CIRC

  • Social Sciences: A
  • Human Sciences: A

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2014
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 0.2
  • Area: Literature and Literary Theory Percentile: 65
  • Area: Cultural Studies Percentile: 39
  • Area: Language and Linguistics Percentile: 38
  • Area: Linguistics and Language Percentile: 37
  • Area: Education Percentile: 11

Abstract

This paper sets out to enquiry about gender-based differences in motivation towards EFL in two different types of instruction, i.e. CLIL and EFL (non-CLIL). The study was carried out with 4th Primary education Spanish students randomly selected from two mixed-gender schools in La Rioja (Spain). The results show that non-CLIL learners are significantly more motivated than CLIL learners. The non-CLIL girls are slightly more motivated than non-CLIL boys. However, CLIL boys are slightly more motivated than CLIL girls. Non-CLIL boys are more motivated than CLIL boys, and non-CLIL girls are more motivated than CLIL girls. These findings indicate that research on CLIL should closely take into account the way this methodological approach is implemented in a specific context since context-specific elements play a pivotal role in students¿ motivation towards EFL.

Bibliographic References

  • Agustín, M. P. & Terrazas, M. (2008). Gender differences in receptive vocabulary size in EFL primary school learners: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the XXXII AEDEAN. Conference, University of Palma de Mallorca, November, 13–15.
  • Baker, S. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50, 311–341.
  • Bernaus, M. & Gardner, R. C. (2008). Teacher motivation strategies, student perceptions, student motivation, and English achievement. The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 387–401.
  • Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523–532.
  • Cid, E., Grañena, G. & Tragant, E. (2009). Constructing and validating the foreign language attitudes and goals survey (FLAGS). System, 37(3), 496–513.
  • Council of Europe (2011). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe.
  • Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–582.
  • Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Csizér, K. & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal 89, 19–36.
  • Dabbagh G, & Khajehpour, M. (2011). Attitudes and motivation in learning English as second language in high school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1209–1213.
  • Dalton-Puffer C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Current research in Europe. In W. Delanoy & L. Volkmann (Eds.). Future perspectives in English language teaching (pp. 7–23). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
  • Eurostat Newsrelease (2009). Proportion of female physicians, tertiary level academic staff and managers increasing, Release Date: 6 March 2009. Eurostat Press Office.
  • Fernández Fontecha, A. & Terrazas Gallego, M. (2012). The role of motivation and age in vocabulary knowledge. VIAL, 9, 39–62.
  • Fernández Fontecha, A. (2010a). First Steps of CLIL in a Spanish Monolingual Community: The Case of La Rioja. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & D. Lasagabaster (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training (79–94). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
  • Fernández Fontecha, A. (2010b). Gender and motivation in EFL vocabulary production. In R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Ed.), Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second languages (93–116). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Gardner, R. C. (2007). Motivation and second language acquisition. Porta Linguarum, 8, 9–20.
  • Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury.
  • Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., & Moorcroft, R. (1985). The role of attitudes and motivation in second language learning: Correlational and experimental considerations, Language Learning, 35(2), 207–227.
  • Gobierno de La Rioja. (2004). Convocatoria de Proyectos de Innovación Lingüística en Centros. Curso 2004/2004. Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. 19 May 2004.
  • Gobierno de La Rioja. (2005). Convocatoria de Proyectos de Innovación Lingüística en Centros. Curso 2005/2006. Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. 19 May 2005.
  • Gobierno de La Rioja. (2009). Convocatoria de Proyectos de Innovación Lingüística en Centros. Curso 2009/2010. Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. 18 March 2009
  • Hartshorne, J. K. & Ullman, M. T. (2006). Why Girls Say "Holded" More Than Boys, Developmental Science, 9(1), 21–32.
  • Henry, A., & Apelgren, B. M. (2008). Young learners and multilingualism: A study of learner attitudes before and after the introduction of a second foreign language to the curriculum. System, 36(4), 607–623.
  • Hernández, T. (2006). Integrative motivation as a predictor of success in the intermediate foreign language classroom, Foreign Language Annals, 39(4), 605–617.
  • Hyde, J. S. & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal abilities. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 53–69.
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2010). Pruebas de Acceso a la Universidad. Año 2010. Retrieved from www.ine.es/prensa/np639.pdf, accessed 10 June 2012.
  • Jiménez, R. M. & Moreno, S. (2004). L2 word associations and the variable sex: An outline according to an electronic tool. In A. Celada, D. Pastor García & P. J. Pardo (Coord.), Actas del XXVII Congreso Internacional de AEDEAN. Salamanca: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Salamanca.
  • Jiménez, R. M. & Ojeda, J. (2008a). CLIL instruction and EFL learners’ productivity in an availability task. Paper presented at the International CLIL Conference: CLIL fusion multilingual mindsets in a multicultural world. Building quality learning communities. Tallin, Estonia, October, 24–25.
  • Jiménez, R. M. & Ojeda, J. (2008b). The English vocabulary of girls and boys: Similarities or differences? Evidence from a corpus based study (pp. 103–115). In L. Litosseliti, H. Sauton, K. Harrington & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Gender and Language Study. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kiss, C. & Nikolov, M. (2005). Preparing, piloting and validating an instrument to measure young learners’ aptitude. Language Learning, 55(1), 99–150.
  • Kissau, S. (2006). Gender differences in motivation to learn French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(3), 401–422.
  • Lasagabaster, D. (2011). English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5, 3–18.
  • Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 30–41.
  • Lasagabaster, D. (2003). Trilingüismo en la Enseñanza: Actitudes hacia la Segunda Lengua Minoritaria, la Mayoritaria y la Extranjera. Lleida: Editorial Milenio.
  • Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Language Attitudes in CLIL and Traditional EFL Classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4–17.
  • Ludwig, J. (1983). Attitudes and expectations: A profile of female and male students of college French, German and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 67(3), 216–227.
  • Maitland, S. B., Herlitz, A., Nyberg, L., Backman, L. & Nilsson, L. G. (2004). Selective sex differences in declarative memory. Memory and Cognition, 32, 1160–1169.
  • Masgoret, A-M. & Gardner, R. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: meta-analyses of studies by Gardner and associates. In Z. Dörnyei, (Ed.), Attitudes, orientations and motivations in language learning (pp. 167–210). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Mehisto, P., Marsh, D. & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Contexts. Oxford: Macmillan.
  • Merisuo-Storm, T. (2007). Pupils’ attitudes towards foreign-language learning and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 226–235.
  • Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Heron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57(3), 417–442.
  • Mori, S. & Gobel, P. (2006). Motivation and gender in the Japanese EFL classroom. System, 34(2), 194–210.
  • Murtagh, L. (2007). Out-of-school use of Irish, motivation to learn the language and proficiency in immersion and subject-only post-Primary programmes. International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education, 10(4), 428–453.
  • Noels, K. A. (2001). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners’ orientations and perceptions of their teachers’ communication style. Language Learning, 51, 107–144.
  • Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L.G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50, 57–85.
  • Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. London: Pearson Education.
  • Oller, J. W., Hudson, A. J., & Liu P. F. (1977). Attitudes and attained proficiency in ESL: A sociolinguistic study of native speakers of Chinese in the United States. Language Learning, 27, 1–27.
  • Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53(4), 649–702.
  • Scarcella, R. & Zimmerman, C. (1998). Academic words and gender. ESL student performance on a test of academic lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 27–49.
  • Schmidt, R. & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. In Z. Dornyei, Z. and R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 313–359). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching Center.
  • Seikkula-Leino, J. (2007). CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education, 21(4), 328–341.
  • Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stumpf, H. (1995). Gender differences in performance on tests of cognitive abilities: Experimental design issues and empirical results. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 275–288.
  • Tremblay, P. & Gardner, R.C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. Modern Language Journal, 79, 505–518.
  • Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory, and Practice (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of neural memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1-2), 231–270.
  • Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 105–122.
  • Ullman, M. T., Miranda, R. A., & Travers, M. L. (2008). Sex differences in the neurocognition of language. In J. B. Becker, K. J. Berkley, N. Geary, E. Hampson, J. P. Herman & E. Young (Eds.), Sex on the Brain: From Genes to Behaviour (pp. 291–309). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W. & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In N. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 933–1002). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Wikeley, F. & Stables, A. (1999). Changes in school students. Approaches to subject option choices: A study of pupils in the West of England in 1984 and 1996. Educational Research, 41, 287–299.
  • Yu, B. & Watkins, D.A. (2008). Motivational and cultural correlates of second language acquisition: An investigation of international students in the universities of the People's Republic of China. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 17.1–17.22.
  • Pérez-Vidal, C. (2009). The integration of content and language in the classroom: A European approach to education (the second time around) (pp. 3–13). In E. Dafouz, & M. C. Guerrini (Eds.), CLIL across Educational Levels. Madrid: Richmond Publishing.