Enterprising personality profile in youthcomponents and assessment

  1. Muñiz Fernández, José 1
  2. Suárez Álvarez, Javier 1
  3. Pedrosa, Ignacio 1
  4. Fonseca Pedrero, Eduardo 2
  5. García Cueto, Eduardo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Any de publicació: 2014

Volum: 26

Número: 4

Pàgines: 545-553

Tipus: Article

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2014.182 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Psicothema

Repositori institucional: lock_openAccés obert Editor

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

Antecedentes: en el estudio de la personalidad de los emprendedores destacan dos enfoques principales, uno centrado en los rasgos generales tipo big five y otro en rasgos más específicos. El objetivo del presente trabajo es el desarrollo y validación de un nuevo instrumento de medida que permita evaluar los rasgos fundamentales de la personalidad emprendedora de los jóvenes. Método: se utilizó una muestra de 2.693 estudiantes (51% hombres) de distintas regiones del norte de España. La media de las edades fue de 16,52 (DT= 1,38), con un rango entre 16 y 23 años. Se identificaron ocho dimensiones principales de la personalidad emprendedora. Resultados: los coeficientes de fiabilidad de las escalas de la batería están por encima de .80. La varianza común entre las ocho dimensiones de personalidad y los big five factors fue del 24%, y con tres dimensiones de inteligencia emocional fue del 16%. La personalidad emprendedora tiene una correlación muy baja con el nivel socioeconómico (r = .126) y moderada con el espíritu emprendedor estimado por los profesores (r = .385). Conclusiones: se han identificado ocho dimensiones específicas de la personalidad emprendedora de los jóvenes, y se desarrolló una nueva batería para su evaluación, con unas propiedades psicométricas adecuadas.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Aguado, D., Rubio, V. J., & Lucia, B. (2011). The risk propensity task (PTR): A proposal for a behavioral performance-based computer test for assessing risk propensity. Anales de Psicología, 27(3), 862-870.
  • Ahmetoglu, G., Leutner, F., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). EQ-nomics: Understanding the relationship between individual differences in trait emotional intelligence and entrepreneurship. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 1028-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.016.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991).The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.
  • Almeida, P.I.L., Ahmetoglu, G., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2014). Who wants to be an entrepreneur? The relationship between vocational interests and individual differences in entrepreneurship. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(1), 102-112. doi: 10.1177/1069072713492923.
  • Altinay, L., Madanoglu, M., Daniele, R., & Lashley, C. (2012). The influence of family tradition and psychological traits on entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 489-499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.07.007.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Athayde, R. (2009). Measuring enterprise potential in young people. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 481-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00300.x.
  • Baum, J.R., Frese, M., Baron, R.A., & Katz, J.A. (2007). Entrepreneurship as an area of psychology study: An introduction. In J.R. Baum, M. Frese, & R.J. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 41-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Brandstätter, H. (2011). Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 222-230. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.007.
  • Chandler, G.N., DeTienne, D.R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T.V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 375-390. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006.
  • Chell, E. (2008). The entrepreneurial personality: A social construction. New York: Routledge.
  • Cheng, C., Cheung, S.F., Chio, J.H., & Chan, M.P (2012). Cultural meaning of perceived control: A meta-analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. Psychological Bulletin, 39(1), 152-88. doi:10.1037/a0028596.
  • Collins, C.J., Hanges, P.J., & Locke, E.A. (2004). The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: A metaanalysis. Human Performance, 17(1), 95-117. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1701_5.
  • Costa, H., Ripoll, P., Sánchez, M., & Carvalho, C. (2013). Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy: Effects on psychological well-being in college students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E50. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.39.
  • Covin, J.G., & Wales, W.J. (2012). The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 677-702. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00432.x.
  • Downing, S.M. (2006). Twelve steps for effective test development. In S.M. Downing & T.M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 3-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Downing, S.M., & Haladyna, T.M. (2006). Handbook of test development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B.D. (2008). Reliability coefficients for ordinal response scales. Psicothema, 20(4), 896-901.
  • Evers, A., Muñiz, J., Hagemeister, C., Hostmaelingen, A., Lindley, P., Sjoberg, A., & Bartram, D. (2013). Assessing the quality of tests: Revision of the EFPA review model. Psicothema, 25(3), 293-201.
  • Extremera, N., Durán, A., & Rey, L. (2007). Perceived emotional intelligence and dispositional optimism-pessimism: Analyzing their role in predicting psychological adjustment among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(6), 1069-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.014.
  • Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2005). Perceived emotional intelligence and life satisfaction: Predictive and incremental validity using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 937-948. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.012.
  • Fernández-Berrocal, P., Alcaide, R., Extremera, N., & Pizarro, D. (2006). The role of emotional intelligence in anxiety and depression among adolescents. Individual Differences Research, 4(1), 16-27.
  • Fernández-Berrocal, P., Extremera, N., & Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Psychological Reports, 94, 751-755.
  • García-Cueto, E., Pedrosa, I., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & Robles, A. (2013). Evaluación del nivel social en población española: creación de un instrumento de medida [Assessment of socioeconomic status in Spanish population: Development of a new measurement instrument]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 18(2), 1-11.
  • Geldhof, G.J., Weiner, M., Agans, J.P., Mueller, M.K., & Lerner, R.M. (2014). Understanding entrepreneurial intent in late adolescence: The role of intentional self-regulation and innovation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 81-91. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9930-8.
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2013, October 8th). Retrieved from: www.gemconsortium.org.
  • Gómez-Benito, J., Hidalgo, M.D., & Zumbo, B.D. (2013). Effectiveness of combining statistical tests and effect sizes when using logistic discriminant function regression to detect differential item functioning for polytomous items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(5), 875-897. doi: 10.1177/0013164413492419.
  • Hadizade, M.A., Raminmehr, H., & Hosseini, S.S. (2009). Relationship between emotional intelligence and entrepreneurial orientation among the employees of oil company-affiliated organizations. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 1(4), 139-162.
  • Hisrich, R., Langan-Fox, J., & Grant, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship research and practice: A call to action for psychology. American Psychologist, 62(6), 575-589.
  • Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
  • IBM Corp. (2010). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0 [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  • Jang, K.L., Livesley, W.J., Ando, J., Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., Riemann, R., & Spinath, F. (2006). Behavioral genetics of the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 261-272. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.033.
  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovation work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302.
  • Kane, M.T. (2006). Validation. In R.L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.) (pp. 17-64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.
  • Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Augustus Kelly.
  • Kreiser, P.M., Marino, L.D., & Weaver, K.M. (2002). Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: A multicountry analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 71-92.
  • Lane, S. (2014). Validity evidence based on testing consequences. Psicothema, 26, 127-135.
  • Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1986). Estrés y procesos cognitivos [Stress and cognitive processes]. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.
  • Lim, S., & Envick, B.R. (2013). Gender and entrepreneurial orientation: A multi-country study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 465-482. doi: 10.1007/s11365-011-0183-2.
  • Liñán, F., & Chen, Y.W. (2006). Testing the entrepreneurial intention model on a two-country sample. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P.J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38, 88-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03192753.
  • Lozano, L.M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology, 4(2), 73-79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73.
  • Mayer, J.D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators (pp. 3-31). New York: Basic Books.
  • Moriano, J.A., Palací, J.F., & Morales, J.F. (2006). Adaptación y validación en España de la Escala de Autoeficacia Emprendedora [Adaptation and validation for Spanish population of the Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy Scale]. Revista de Psicología Social, 21(1), 51-64.
  • Moore, S., & Gullone, E. (1996). Predicting adolescent risk behavior using a personalized cost benefit analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 343-359. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01537389.
  • Moreno, R., Martínez, R., & Muñiz, J. (2006). New guidelines for developing multiple-choice items. Methodology, 2, 65-72.
  • Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R.K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición [International Test Commision guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition]. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157.
  • Muñiz, J., Fidalgo, A.M., García-Cueto, E., Martínez, R., & Moreno, R. (2005). Análisis de los ítems [Item analysis]. Madrid: La Muralla.
  • Neqabi, S., & Bahadori, M. (2012). Relationship between emotional intelligence and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Military Medicine, 14(2), 123-128.
  • Obschonka, M., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., Silbereisen, R.K., Gosling, S.D., & Potter, J. (2013). The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 104-122. doi: 10.1037/a0032275.
  • OECD/The European Commission (2013). The missing entrepreneurs: Policies for inclusive entrepreneurship in Europe. Brussels: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264188167-en.
  • Padilla, J.L., & Benítez, I. (2014). Validity evidence based on response processes. Psicothema, 26, 136-144.
  • Peterman, N.E., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise Education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 129-144.
  • Pradhan, R., & Nath, P. (2012). Perception of entrepreneurial orientation and emotional intelligence. Global Business Review, 13(1), 89-108.
  • Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007a). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. In J.R. Baum, M. Frese, & R.J. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 41-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007b). Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 16, 353-385. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594320701595438.
  • Rios, J., & Wells, C. (2014). Validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema, 26, 108-116.
  • Salguero, J.M., Fernández-Berrocal, P., Balluerka, N., & Aritzeta, A. (2010). Measuring perceived emotional intelligence in the adolescent population: Psychometric properties of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(9), 1197-1209.
  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph No. 17.
  • Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W.J. van der Linden & R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85-100). New York: Springer.
  • Sánchez, J.C. (2010). Evaluación de la personalidad emprendedora: validez factorial del Cuestionario de Orientación Emprendedora (COE) [Assessment of the enterprising personality: Factor validity of the Entrepreneurial Orientation Questionnaire]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 42(1), 41-52.
  • Schmeiser, C.B., & Welch, C. (2006). Test development. In R.L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.) (pp. 307-353). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.
  • Schroder, E., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., & Arnaud, N. (2011). Career choice intentions of adolescents with a family business background. Family Business Review, 24(4), 305-321. doi: 10.1177/0894486511416977.
  • Schuler, H., Thornton, G.C.I., Frintrup, A., & Mueller-Hanson, R.A. (2004). Achievement motivation inventory test manual. Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
  • Schumpeter, J. (1911). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). In C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton, & K.H. Vesper (Eds.), The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72-90). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Shepperd, J.A., Carroll, P., Grace, J., & Terry, M. (2002). Exploring the causes of comparative optimism. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 65-98.
  • Sireci, S., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema, 26, 100-107.
  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566-591. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002.
  • Stewart, W.H., May, R.C., & Kalia, A. (2008). Environmental perceptions and scanning in the United States and India: Convergence in entrepreneurial information seeking? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 83-106.
  • Steward, W.H., & Roth, P.L. (2004). Data quality affects meta-analytic conclusions: A response to Miner and Raju (2004) concerning entrepreneurial risk propensity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 14-21. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.14.
  • Stormer, F., Kline, T., & Goldenberg, S. (1999). Measuring entrepreneurship with the general enterprising tendency (GET) test: Criterion-related validity and reliability. Human Systems Management, 18, 47-52.
  • Suárez-Álvarez, J., Campillo-Álvarez, A., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2013). Professional training in the workplace: The role of achievement motivation and locus of control. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E35. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.19.
  • Suárez-Álvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2014). Screening enterprising personality in youth: An empirical model. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1-9. doi: 10.1017/sip.2014.61.
  • Suliman, A.M., & Al-Shaikh, F.N. (2007). Emotional intelligence at work: Links to conflict and innovation. Jordan Employee Relations, 29(2), 208-220.
  • Sunindijo, R.Y., Hadikusumo, B.H.W., & Ogunlana, S. (2007). Emotional intelligence and leadership styles in construction project management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(4), 166-170. doi: 10.1064/(asce)42-597x(2007)23.
  • Taussig, F.W. (1915). Principles of economics (rev. ed., Vol. II). New York: Macmillan.
  • Timmerman, M.E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209-220.
  • Van Gelderen, M., & Jansen, P. (2006). Autonomy as a start-up motive. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(1), 23-32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14626000610645289.
  • Veciana, J.M. (1999). Creación de empresas como programa de investigación científica [Business creation as scientific research program]. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8(3), 11-36.
  • Vigil-Colet, A., Morales-Vives, F., Camps, E., Tous, J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Development and validation of the Overall Personality Assessment Scale (OPERAS). Psicothema, 25, 100-106. doi:10.7334/psicothema2011.411.
  • Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Zhao, H., Seibert, S.E., & Lumpkin, G.T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381-404.
  • Zimowski, M.F., Muraki, E., Mislevy, R.J., & Bock, R.D. (1996). BILOGMG: Multiple-group IRT analysis and test maintenance for binary items [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • Zumbo, B.D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (Ordinal) item scores. Ottawa ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.