Applicability of wild mushrooms to monitor environmental contamination of europium in Leicester, England

  1. Fernández, Antonio Peña 1
  2. Higueras, Manuel 3
  3. Sgamma, Tziana 1
  4. Evans, Mark D. 1
  5. Segura, Edna 3
  6. Bedmar, M. Carmen Lobo 2
  1. 1 De Montfort University
    info

    De Montfort University

    Leicester, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/0312pnr83

  2. 2 Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario
    info

    Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario

    Madrid, España

  3. 3 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Actas:
ISEE Conference Abstracts

Editorial: ISEE

ISSN: 1078-0475

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 2023

Número: 1

Congreso: ISEE 2023: 35th Annual Conference of the International Society of Environmental Epidemiology (35º. 2023. Taiwan)

Tipo: Póster de Congreso

DOI: 10.1289/ISEE.2023.EP-019 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor
Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the current levels of europium (Eu) in topsoils monitored across Leicestershire (UK) did not represent an oral/dermal toxic risk for the population, wild mushrooms were collected in the same areas to gain a better picture of its environmental distribution and risks. METHOD: 106 mushrooms were collected from Leicester city and Bradgate Park, and species were identified by DNA barcoding. Eu was monitored by ICP-MS in cleaned/dried/homogenised mushrooms [LoD=0.00056 µg/g dry weight (dw)] and in 850 topsoils collected in these areas. RESULTS: Eu concentrations were higher in mushrooms collected in urban areas, although without significance (median and ranges, in µg/g dw): 0.0016 (0.0004-0.2891) vs. 0.0013 (0.00036-0.0529), which might be attributed to fertilisers. However, levels of Eu varied between mushrooms collected across the four cardinal subareas in which the city was divided (p-value=7E-9), which might indicate differences in urbanisation, as Eu is used in flat screen displays and optical fibres. Although a correlation between the content of Eu in mushrooms and their respective topsoil/subareas was not found, a similar distribution was found. Thus, significantly higher median concentrations of Eu were found in the NE (0.0047, 0.8110) and lower in the NW (0.00087, 0.5960), in mushrooms and topsoils (all in µg/g dw and µg/g, respectively). Moreover, Eu significantly varied between the three main mushroom species collected (ranges, in µg/g dw; p-value=7E-15): Agaricus bitorquis (edible; 0.00079-0.00706), Panaeolus foenisecii (poisonous; 0.00104-0.17146) and Mycena citrinomarginata (unclassified; 0.00123-0.07117). Moreover, Eu was only detected in 54.5% of the A. bitorquis samples, although detected in all the other main species collected. CONCLUSIONS: The levels of Eu found were similar/lower than those reported in other major monitoring studies performed in other European countries, suggesting that the environmental presence of Eu would represent a minimal risk for Leicestershire’s population, including those individuals that pick up wild mushrooms for consumption.