Language learning motivation in multilingual CLIL

  1. Geoghegan, Leah 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Journal:
Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

ISSN: 1697-7467

Year of publication: 2024

Issue Title: PREVIEW-January

Issue: 41

Type: Article

More publications in: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

Institutional repository: lock_openOpen access Editor lock_openOpen access Editor

Abstract

Motivation has long been acknowledged as an undeniably important factor in language learning, and recent research indicates that it may play an even more important role in CLIL than non-CLIL settings (Navarro Pablo & García Jiménez, 2018). However, given the lack of research into CLIL in languages other than English, Dalton-Puffer, Nikula and Smit (2010) have called for a comparison across additional languages, so as to determine the strengths and weaknesses of CLIL language-independently. This comparison is particularly necessary with respect to L2 motivation, given that the spread of English as a global language has led to qualitative differences between learning English compared with other languages (Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2013). The current study thus investigates the language learning motivation of students taking both English and French CLIL classes to determine if there are quantitative differences between the participants’ English and French language learning motivation. Results indicate that the participants exhibited a higher level of language learning motivation towards English than French. The findings highlight the need to better prepare CLIL methodologies when languages such as French are taught alongside English.

Bibliographic References

  • Citas Busse, V., & Williams, M. (2010). Why German? Motivation of students studying German at English universities. Language Learning Journal, 38(1), 67-85.
  • Bloomer, A. (2010). Designing a questionnaire. In S. Hunston & D. Oakley (Eds.), Introducing applied linguistics concepts and skills (pp. 145–150). London: Routledge.
  • Brady, I.K. (2015). The ideal and ought-to L2 selves of Spanish learners of English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de Murcia, Spain.
  • Brady, I.K. (2019). Exploring the L2 Motivational Self System in Spain: Study design and preliminary findings. Journal of English Studies, 17, 43-73. https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.3575
  • Calafato, R., & Tang, F. (2019). Multilingualism and gender in the UAE: A look at the motivational selves of Emirati teenagers. System, 84, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.06.006
  • Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011
  • Csizér, K. (2019). The L2 motivational self system. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning (pp. 71-93). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of applied linguistics, 31, 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
  • Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms: Current findings and contentious issues. John Benjamins.
  • De Smet, A., Mettewie, L., Galand, B., Hiligsmann, P., & van Mensel, L. (2018). Classroom anxiety and enjoyment in CLIL and non-CLIL: Does the target language matter? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 47-72. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.3
  • De Smet, A., Mettewie, L., Hiligsmann, P., Galand, B., & van Mensel, L. (2019). Does CLIL shape language attitudes and motivation? Interactions with target languages and instruction levels. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1671308
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Constructing, administering, and processing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Multilingual Matters.
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23(4), 421-462. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.4.421
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2012). How to Design and Analyze Surveys in Second Language Acquisition. In A. Mackey & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide (pp. 74–94). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2013). Teaching and researching: Motivation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., & Németh, N. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes and globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Multilingual Matters.
  • Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P.D., & Henry, A. (2014). Introduction: Applying complex dynamic systems principles to empirical research on L2 motivation. In Z. Dörnyei, P.D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 1-7). Multilingual Matters.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage publications.
  • Geoghegan, L. (2018). International posture, motivation and identity in SA. In C. Pérez-Vidal, S. López-Serrano, J. Ament and D. Thomas Wilhelm (Eds.), Learning context effects: study abroad, formal instruction and international immersion classrooms (pp. 215-253). Language Science Press.
  • Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
  • https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484038
  • Islam, M., Lamb, M., & Chambers, G. (2013). The L2 motivational self system and national interest: A Pakistani perspective. System, 41(2), 231-244.
  • Larson-Hall, J. (2012). How to Run Statistical Analyses. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 245-274). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • MacIntyre, P D., MacKinnon, S.P., & Clément, R. (2009). Toward the development of a scale to assess possible selves as a source of language learning motivation. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 193-214). Multilingual Matters.
  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
  • Merino, J., & Lasagabaster, D. (2018). CLIL as a way to multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1128386
  • Moskovsky, C., Assulaimani, T., Racheva, S., & Harkins, J. (2016). The L2 motivational self system and L2 achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 641-654.
  • Navarro Pablo, M., & García Jiménez, E. (2018). Are CLIL students more motivated? An analysis of affective factors and their relation to language attainment. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 29, 71-90.
  • Oakes, L. (2013). Foreign language learning in a ‘monoglot culture’: Motivational variables amongst students of French and Spanish at an English university. System, 41(1), 178-191.
  • Oakes, L., & Howard, M. (2019). Learning French as a foreign language in a globalised world: an empirical critique of the L2 Motivational Self System. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(1), 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1642847
  • Pavón Vázquez, V., & Rubio, F. (2010). Teachers’ concerns and uncertainties about the introduction of CLIL programmes. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 14, 45-58.
  • Pérez, A., Lorenzo, F., & Pavón, V. (2016). European bilingual models beyond linguafranca: key findings from CLIL French programs. Language policy, 15(4), 485-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9386-7
  • Pérez-Cañado, M.L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
  • Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Lasagabaster, D. (2010). Introduction. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & D. Lasagabaster (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. ix-xvii). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Ryan, S. (2008). The Ideal L2 Selves of Japanese learners of English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Nottingham, UK.
  • Ryan, S. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 120-143). Multilingual Matters.
  • San Isidro, X. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL implementation in Europe. Theory into Practice, 57(3), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484038
  • Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 66-97). Multilingual Matters.
  • Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Beyond global English: Motivation to learn languages in a multicultural world: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 451-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12407
  • Woodrow, L. (2017). Motivation in language learning. In R. Breeze & C.S. Guinda (Eds.), Essential competencies for English-medium university teaching (pp. 235-248). Springer.