How Rootstocks Impact the Scion Vigour and Vine Performance of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo

  1. Pou, Alicia 1
  2. Rivacoba, Luis 1
  3. Portu, Javier 1
  4. Mairata, Andreu 1
  5. Labarga, David 1
  6. García-Escudero, Enrique 1
  7. Martín, Ignacio 1
  1. 1 Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino
    info

    Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01rm2sw78

Revista:
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

ISSN: 1755-0238,  1322-7130

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 2022

Páginas: 1-16

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1155/2022/9871347 WoS: WOS:000891069200001 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

Background and Aim. The genetically determined characteristics of grapevine rootstocks are important factors that affect scion performance. This 3 years' field study aimed to characterize the influence of four well-established 30-year-old rootstocks (110 Richter, 1103 Paulsen, 41B, and 161-49Couderc) on the Tempranillo cultivar in the semiarid wine growing region of D.O.Ca. Rioja, North-Eastern Spain. Methods and Results. Nutrient concentrations of mineral elements at flowering and veraison were determined in the vines, jointly with grapevine-water status, gas exchange, vine vigour, and chlorophyll content. Moreover, grapevine yield and grape quality were determined at harvest. The least vigorous rootstocks (41B, 161-49C) conferred drought adaptability traits by increasing water use efficiency (WUE) and decreasing whole-plant water conductance per unit leaf area (K-plant) compared to the more vigorous rootstocks (1103-P, 110-R). In contrast, the more vigorous rootstocks increased water transport capacity, which led to higher plant performance and nutrient uptake efficiency. At flowering, 1103-P and to a lesser extent, 110-R were most efficient at taking up nutrients, while 161-49C had the lowest concentrations for most nutrients. At veraison, 41B exhibited closer behaviour to 110-R than 161-49C, while 1103-P and 161-49C remained the most differentiated rootstocks, with higher and lower nutrient uptake, respectively. In addition, compared to the more vigorous rootstocks, the yield was up to 1.6 kg lower for the less vigorous rootstocks but the grape composition was improved. Notably, 161-49C led to higher total soluble solids, total acidity, and polyphenol content. Conclusions. Overall, grafting onto specific rootstocks represents a strategy to confer differential regulation of grapevine water-saving strategies, yield, berry quality, and nutrient uptake potential. Significance of the Study. This information may be useful for growers seeking to develop a site-specific selection of rootstocks for the grafted Tempranillo cv.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 10.1002/fes3.14
  • M. L. de la Hera, (2007), Agricultural Water Management, 87, pp. 261, 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.08.001
  • 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.01.017
  • 10.5897/ijppb2013.0199
  • 10.1007/s40626-016-0057-7
  • 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.02.025
  • 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.012
  • N. Verdugo-Vásquez, (2021), Agronomy, 11, pp. 1, 10.3390/agronomy11050979
  • 10.3390/agronomy11020327
  • N. Ollat, (2016), Rootstocks as a Component of Adaptation to Environment
  • M. Keller, (2020), The Science of Grapevines, pp. 199, 10.1016/B978-0-12-816365-8.00006-3
  • S. M. Olarte, (2018), American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 69, pp. 32, 10.5344/ajev.2017.17017
  • 10.1111/ajgw.12054
  • 10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.1.2458
  • 10.1093/jxb/erq247
  • 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04110.x
  • E. Peterlunger, (1990), Vignevini, 17, pp. 43
  • 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.04.001
  • A. Ibacache, (2020), Fruit Crops: Diagnosis and Management of Nutrient Constraints, pp. 297, 10.1016/B978-0-12-818732-6.00021-6
  • 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.08.001
  • Z. Xiao, (2020), Vitis, 59, pp. 117
  • D. R. Smart, (2006), American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 57, pp. 89, 10.5344/ajev.2006.57.1.89
  • 10.1111/ajgw.12533
  • J. B. Passioura, (2006), Functional Plant Biology, 33, pp. 1075, 10.1071/FP06223
  • D. P. Pongrácz, (1983), Rootstocks for Grape-Vines
  • Soil Survey Staff, (2006), Keys to Soil Taxonomy
  • T. L. Pritchard, (1992), Viticultural Practices, pp. 12
  • 10.1007/s004680000071
  • 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.05.008
  • 10.1364/ao.43.004488
  • 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.05.002
  • 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01639.x
  • J. W. Rouse, (1974), Third ERTS Symposium, NASA, pp. 309
  • 10.5344/ajev.2010.09091
  • 10.1016/s0377-8401(98)00136-9
  • 10.1016/s0003-2670(97)00594-1
  • Eec, (1990), Official Journal of the European Communities, 272, pp. 1
  • Z. Lipka, (1974), Revue suisse de viticulture, pp. 5
  • P. Ribéreau-Gayon, (2006), Handbook of Enology. The Microbiology of Wine and Vinifications
  • 10.14719/pst.2014.1.3.64
  • S. E. Spayd, (1994), American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 45, pp. 34, 10.5344/ajev.1994.45.1.34
  • 10.1002/jsfa.8175
  • M. Corso, (2014), Plant Science Today, 1, pp. 108, 10.14719/pst.2014.1.3.64
  • M. G. McCarthy, (1990), American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, pp. 126, 10.5344/ajev.1990.41.2.126
  • J. R. Whiting, (2005), Grapevine Rootstocks, pp. 167
  • 10.1016/j.jag.2015.02.012
  • L. F. Johnson, (2001), Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 17, pp. 557, 10.13031/2013.6454
  • 10.3390/rs70404026
  • 10.1007/s11119-008-9073-1
  • J. Primicerio, pp. 465
  • S. Vélez, (2019), Vitis, 58, pp. 33
  • 10.1007/s11119-012-9275-4
  • S. Stamatiadis, (2006), American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 57, pp. 415, 10.5344/ajev.2006.57.4.415
  • 10.2134/agronj2004.1139
  • P. R. Clingeleffer, pp. 451
  • 10.1093/jxb/ers312
  • 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01064.x
  • 10.1071/fp09191
  • 10.5344/ajev.2012.11004
  • 10.1111/ajgw.12022
  • 10.20870/oeno-one.2015.49.1.94
  • Z. Kucukyumuk, (2011), Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 17, pp. 633
  • 10.1016/s1671-2927(09)60274-1
  • 10.1093/treephys/tpy074
  • A. Scienza, (1986), Vitis, 25, pp. 160
  • 10.1080/01904169409364872
  • N. Sivritepe, (2010), Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38, pp. 193
  • 10.3390/su13052477
  • 10.1080/01904160903391081
  • 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01514.x
  • 10.1016/j.eja.2012.10.011
  • 10.1071/fp09010
  • 10.1071/fp11248
  • M. Rives, (1971), Vitis, 9, pp. 280
  • V. Nuzzo, (2006), American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 57, pp. 314, 10.5344/ajev.2006.57.3.314
  • J. M. Cortell, (2008), American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 59, pp. 1, 10.5344/ajev.2008.59.1.1
  • J. Wooldridge, (2010), South African Journal for Enology and Viticulture, 31, pp. 45
  • R. R. Walker, (2009), Australian Viticulture, 13, pp. 70
  • 10.1016/0922-338x(96)89154-9
  • W. M. Kliewer, (2005), American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 56, pp. 170, 10.5344/ajev.2005.56.2.170
  • 10.1071/ar9950541
  • R. R. Walker, (1994), Bull. l’OIV, 67, pp. 634