Collaboration as an Enabler for Digital Transformation: The Helix Paradigm

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98.
• Alderson, D. L., Brown, G. G., & Carlyle, W. M. (2015). Operational models of infrastructure resilience. Risk Analysis, 35(4), 562–586.
• Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring quadruple helix outlining user-oriented innovation models.
• Badillo, E. R., Galera, F. L., & Moreno Serrano, R. (2017). Cooperation in R&D, firm size and type of partnership: Evidence for the Spanish automotive industry. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 123–143.
• Baglieri, D., Baldi, F., & Tucci, C. L. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation, 76, 51–63.
• Barzotto, M., Corradini, C., Fai, F., Labory, S., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2020). Smart specialization, Industry 4.0 and lagging regions: some directions for policy. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7(1), 318–332.
• Baum, J. A., & Ingram, P. (2002). Interorganizational learning and network organization: Toward a behavioral theory of the interfirm. The economics of choice, change, and organization: Essays in memory of Richard M. Cyert (pp. 191–218).
• Bell, S. C., & Orzen, M. A. (2016). Lean IT: Enabling and sustaining your lean transformation. CRC Press.
• Bogers, M., Zobel, A. K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., et al. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40.
• Casalet, M., & Stezano, F. (2020). Risks and opportunities for the progress of digitalization in Mexico. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(7), 689–704.
• Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 1–12.
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234.
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69.
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: Building on the quadruple and quintuple helix innovation concepts and the “mode 3” knowledge production system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 327–372.
• Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F., & Grigoroudis, E. (2022). Helix trilogy: The triple, quadruple, and quintuple innovation helices from a theory, policy, and practice set of perspectives. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2272–2301.
• Carayannis, E. G., & Formica, P. (2006). Intellectual venture capitalists: An emerging breed of knowledge entrepreneurs. Industry and Higher Education, 20(3), 151–156.
• Colapinto, C., & Porlezza, C. (2012). Innovation in creative industries: From the quadruple helix model to the systems theory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 343–353.
• Cunningham, J. A., & O’Reilly, P. (2018). Macro, meso and micro perspectives of technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 545–557.
• Du, Y., & Li, F. (2019). Intelligent multi-microgrid energy management based on deep neural network and model-free reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(2), 1066–1076.
• Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Tsang, E. W. (2008). Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677–690.
• Economic and Social Council of Galicia (CES). (2017). For an alliance in the Galician industrial sector. Economic and Social Council of Galicia. ISBN: 978-84-697-9269-8.
• EFFRA (The European Factories of the Future Research Association). (2023). MADE S.C.A.R.L.—Competence Center Industry 4.0. Retrieved April 02, 2023, from https://www.effra.eu/made-scarl-competence-center-industria-40
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix-University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.
• Farinha, L., Ferreira, J., & Gouveia, B. (2016). Networks of innovation and competitiveness: A triple helix case study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7, 259–275.
• Fawcett, S. E., Fawcett, A. M., Knemeyer, A. M., Brockhaus, S., & Webb, G. S. (2021). Overcoming the collaborative challenge: Commitment as a super-ordinate enabler of value co-creation. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(9), 1022–1047.
• Ferrer-Serrano, M., Fuentelsaz, L., & Latorre-Martinez, M. P. (2021a). Examining knowledge transfer and networks: An overview of the last twenty years. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(8), 2007–2037.
• Ferrer-Serrano, M., Latorre-Martínez, M. P., & Fuentelsaz, L. (2021b). The European research landscape under the Horizon 2020 Lenses: The interaction between science centers, public institutions, and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(3), 828–853.
• Freitas, I. M. B., & Von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Mapping public support for innovation: A comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France. Research Policy, 37(9), 1446–1464.
• Gerstlberger, W. (2004). Regional innovation systems and sustainability—Selected examples of international discussion. Technovation, 24(9), 749–758.
• Grybauskas, A., Stefanini, A., & Ghobakhloo, M. (2022). Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature review on the social implications of industry 4.0. Technology in Society, 101997.
• Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.
• Hernández-Trasobares, A., & Murillo-Luna, J. L. (2020). The effect of triple helix cooperation on business innovation: The case of Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120296.
• Holmström, J., Holweg, M., Lawson, B., Pil, F. K., & Wagner, S. M. (2019). The digitalization of operations and supply chain management: Theoretical and methodological implications. Journal of Operations Management, 65(8), 728–734.
• Huggins, R., Johnston, A., & Thompson, P. (2012). Network capital, social capital and knowledge flow: How the nature of inter-organizational networks impacts on innovation. Industry and Innovation, 19(3), 203–232.
• Ietto, B., Ancillai, C., Sabatini, A., Carayannis, E. G., & Gregori, G. L. (2022). The role of external actors in SMEs’ human-centered industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical perspective on Italian competence centers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
• Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.
• Keeling, D. I., Keeling, K., de Ruyter, K., & Laing, A. (2021). How value co-creation and co-destruction unfolds: A longitudinal perspective on dialogic engagement in health services interactions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 236–257.
• Keeys, L. A., & Huemann, M. (2017). Project benefits co-creation: Shaping sustainable development benefits. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1196–1212.
• Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 193–210.
• Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6, 239–242.
• Latorre Martínez, M. P., Ferrer Serrano, M., Fuentelsaz Lamata, L., Íñiguez Dieste, D., & Ruiz Manzanares, G. (2020). Research in Aragon in the EU context: Analysis of the H2020 ecosystem. Economic and Social Council of Aragon (CESA).
• León-Mateos, F., Sartal, A., López-Manuel, L., & Quintás, M. A. (2021). Adapting our seaports to the challenges of climate change: Development and validation of a port resilience index. Marine Policy, 130, 104573.
• Li, Y., Arora, S., Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2018). Using web mining to explore Triple Helix influences on growth in small and mid-size firms. Technovation, 76, 3–14.
• López-Manuel, L., León-Mateos, F., & Sartal, A. (2020). Closing loops, easing strains: Industry 4.0’s potential for overcoming challenges of circularity in manufacturing environments. In Circular economy for the management of operations (pp. 23–47). CRC Press.
• López‐Manuel, L., Vázquez, X. H., & Sartal, A. (2023). Firm, industry, and country effects on CO2 emissions levels. Forthcoming in Business Strategy and the Environment.
• Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.
• MADE. (2023). MADE: Fabbrica digitale e sostenibile. Retrieved April 02, 2023, from https://www.made-cc.eu/it/
• Matalamäki, M. J., & Joensuu-Salo, S. (2022). Digitalization and strategic flexibility—A recipe for business growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(3), 380–401.
• Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Cooperative R&D: Why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499.
• Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. (2004). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: A policy model for other governments. Ivory Tower & Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before & After the Bayh-Dole Act.
• Nicotra, M., Romano, M., & Del Giudice, M. (2014). The evolution dynamic of a cluster knowledge network: The role of firms’ absorptive capacity. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 70–93.
• Novelli, M., Schmitz, B., & Spencer, T. (2006). Networks, clusters and innovation in tourism: A UK experience. Tourism Management, 27(6), 1141–1152.
• Oh, D. S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1–6.
• Park, H. W. (2014). Mapping election campaigns through negative entropy: Triple and Quadruple Helix approach to South Korea’s 2012 presidential election. Scientometrics, 99(1), 187–197.
• Popkova, E. G., Ragulina, Y. V., & Bogoviz, A. V. (Eds.). (2019). Industry 4.0: Industrial revolution of the 21st century (Vol. 169, p. 249). Springer.
• President Johnson’s thirty-fourth news conference was held on the front lawn at the LBJ Ranch, Johnson City, Tex., at 10:45 a.m. on Saturday, November 28, 1964. Source: Lyndon B. Johnson, The President’s News Conference at the LBJ Ranch.
• Pugh, R., Soetanto, D., Jack, S. L., & Hamilton, E. (2021). Developing local entrepreneurial ecosystems through integrated learning initiatives: The Lancaster case. Small Business Economics, 56, 833–847.
• Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196–205.
• Ritala, P., De Kort, C., & Gailly, B. (2023). Orchestrating knowledge networks: Alter-oriented brokering. Journal of Management, 49(3), 1140–1178.
• Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., & Sebastian, I. M. (2017, October 19). Digitized ≠ Digital | MIT CISR. MIT CISR. Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://cisr.mit.edu/publication/2017_1001_DigitizedNotDigital_RossBeathSebastian
• Sartal, A., & Vázquez, X. H. (2017). Implementing information technologies and operational excellence: Planning, emergence and randomness in the survival of adaptive manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 45, 1–16.
• Scuotto, V., Beatrice, O., Valentina, C., Nicotra, M., Di Gioia, L., & Briamonte, M. F. (2020). Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119906.
• Szücs, F. (2018). Research subsidies, industry-university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy, 47(7), 1256–1266.
• Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43.
• The American Presidency Project. (n.d.). The President’s News Conference at the LBJ Ranch | The American Presidency Project. The American Presidency Project. Retrieved May 8, 2023, from https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-the-lbj-ranch-1
• Thrassou, A., Uzunboylu, N., Vrontis, D., & Christofi, M. (2020). Digitalization of SMEs: A review of opportunities and challenges. In The changing role of SMEs in global business: Volume II: Contextual evolution across markets, disciplines and sectors (pp. 179–200).
• Tsai, K. H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765–778.
• Vargas, C., Whelan, J., Brimblecombe, J., & Allender, S. (2022). Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health: A perspective on definition and distinctions. Public Health Research & Practice, 32(2).
• Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal Für Betriebswirtschaft, 55, 63–78.
• Von Malmborg, F. (2004). Networking for knowledge transfer: Towards an understanding of local authority roles in regional industrial ecosystem management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(5), 334–346.
• Zheng, P., Wang, H., Sang, Z., Zhong, R. Y., Liu, Y., Liu, C., et al. (2018). Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 13, 137–150.
• Zou, H., & Ghauri, P. N. (2008). Learning through international acquisitions: The process of knowledge acquisition in China. Management International Review, 48, 207–226.