La relación entrenador-deportista: Propiedades psicométricas de la adaptación al castellano del cart-q

  1. Cristina Sanz Fernández 1
  2. Itziar Alonso Arbiol 1
  3. Alicia Pérez de Albéniz Iturriaga 2
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Journal:
Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte

ISSN: 1577-0354

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 23

Issue: 89

Pages: 184-198

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte

Institutional repository: lock_openOpen access Editor

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to adapt into Spanish and examine the construct validityof the Coach-Sport Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). A total of 162 sports(wo)men (43.2% women), players of differente sports, were between 16 and 59 years old(M = 26.41, SD= 8.98), made up the sample.A confirmatory factorial analysis,revealed a trifactorial structure. Indexes of goodness-of-fit (GFI: .951; CFI: .890; TLI: .952and error (RMSEA: .078; RMR: .067)were adequate. Regardinggender and level differences, professional sportswomen were significantly closer to their coaches than the rest of the participants. Results support the use of the instrumentin the context ofSpanish-speakingsport relationships. Gender and level differences need to betaken into account for the improvement ofathletes’ relational satisfaction

Bibliographic References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos Users' Guide: Version 3.6. SmallWaters Corporation.
  • Balaguer, I., González, L., Fabra, P., Castillo, I., Juan Mercé, J., y Duda, J. (2012). Coaches’ interpersonal style, basic psychological needs and the welland ill-being of young soccer players: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 1619-1629.
  • Balduck, A. L., y Jowett, S. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Belgian coach version of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). Scandinavian Journal Medicine and Science in Sports, 20, 779-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01020.x
  • Baumeister, R. F. y Sommer, K.L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122, 38-44. http://doi.org/ 10.1037/00332909.122.1.38
  • Carron, A.V., Colman, M. M., Wheeler, J. y Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 168-188.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1988). The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In J. R. Nesselroade and R. B. Cattell (eds.) Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 131-203). Plenum Press.
  • Eys, M., Evans, M. B., Martin, L. J., Ohlert, J., Wolf, S. A., Van Bussel, M. V. y Steins, C. (2015). Cohesion and performance for female and male sports team. The Sport Psychologist, 29, 97-109.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. y Black, W. C. (2007). Análisis multivariante. Prentice Hall.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Adaptación de tests para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. En J. Muñiz (Coor.), Psicometría (pp. 207-238). Universitas.
  • Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.) (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage.
  • Jowett, S. (2003). When the “honeymoon” is over: A case study of a coach-athlete dyad in crisis. The Sport Psychologist, 17, 444-460.
  • Jowett, S. (2007). Expanding the interpersonal dimension: Closeness in the coach-athlete relationship: A commentary. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2, 513-517.
  • Jowett, S. (2007). Interdependence analysis and the 3+1Cs in the coach-athlete relationship. En S. Jowett y D. Lavalle (Eds.), Social Psychology in sport (pp. 15-27). Human Kineticks.
  • Jowett, S. (2009a). Factor structure and criterion-related validity of the metaperspective version of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014998
  • Jowett, S. (2009b). Validating coach-athlete relationship measures with the nomological network. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 13, 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10913670802609136
  • Jowett, S., Paull, G., y Pensgaard, A. M. (2005). Coach-athlete relationship. In Taylor, J., Wilson, G. S. (Eds.), Applying Sport Psychology: Four Perspectives (pp. 153–170). Human Kinetics.
  • Jowett, S., Yang, X., y Lorimer, R. (2012). The role of personality, empathy, and satisfaction with instruction within the context of the coach-athlete relationship. International Journal of Coaching Science, 6, 3-20.
  • Jowett, S., y Cockerill, I. M. (2002). Incompatibility in the coach-athlete relationship. En Cockerill, I. (Coord.), Solution in Sport Psychology (pp. 16- 31). Thompson Learning.
  • Jowett, S., y Cockerill, I. M. (2003). Olympic medalists’ perspective of the athlete coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00011-0
  • Jowett, S., y Nezlek, J. (2012) Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 287-301. doi:10.1177/0265407511420980
  • Jowett, S., y Ntoumanis, N. (2003). The Greek Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (GrCART-Q): Scale development and validation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 34, 101-124.
  • Jowett, S., y Ntoumanis, N. (2004). The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal Medicine and Science in Sports, 14, 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.x
  • Kristiansen, E., Tomten, S.E., Hanstad, D.V. y Roberts, G.C. (2012). Coaching communication issues with elite female athletes: Two Norwegian case studies. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine Science and Sports, 22, 156- 167.
  • Lafrenière, M. A., Jowett, S., Vallerand, R. J., Donahue, E. G., y Lorimer, R. (2008). Passion in sport: On the quality of the coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 541-560.
  • LaVoi, N. M. (2007). Expanding the interpersonal dimension: Closeness in the coach-athlete relationship. International Journal of Sport Science and Coaching, 2, 497-512.
  • Morales Sánchez, V., Hernández Mendo, A. y Blanco, A. (2009). Evaluación de la calidad en organizaciones deportivas: adaptación del modelo Servqual. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 18, 137-150.
  • Pulido, J. J., Leo, F. M., Chamorro, J. L. y García-Calvo, T. (2015). ¿Apoyan los entrenadores la motivación de sus deportistas? Diferencias en la percepción del comportamiento. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 24, 139-145.
  • Rhind, J. A. y Jowett, S. (2010). Initial evidence for the criterion-related and structural validity of the long versions of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire. European Journal of Sport Science, 10, 359-370.
  • Rhind, J. A. y Jowett, S., y Yang, S. X. (2012). A comparison of athletes’ perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship in team and individual sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 35, 433-452.
  • Sandstrom, E., Linnér, L., y Stambulova, N. (2016). Career profiles of athlete-coach relationships: Descriptions and interpretations. International journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11, 395-409.
  • Sevdalis, A., y Raab, M. (2014). Empathy in sports, exercise, and the performing arts. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.10.013
  • Vieira, L. F., Andrade, J. R. Pujals, C., Jowett, S., Codonhato, R. y Nickenig, J. R. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q)-Athlete Version. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempheno Humano, 17, 635-649. https://doi.org/10.5007/19800037.2015v17n6p635
  • Vigário, P., Teixeira, A., y Mendes, F. (2019). Coach-athlete dyad: perception of psychosocial and environmental factors in the relationship a case study (Pareja entrenador-atleta: percepción de los factores psicosociales y ambientales en la relación – un estudio de caso). Retos, 37, 666-672.
  • Yang, S. X., y Jowett, S. (2010). An examination of the psychometric properties of the Chinese Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). International Journal of Coaching Science, 4, 73-89.
  • Yang, S. X., y Jowett, S. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) in seven countries. Psychology of Sports and Exercise, 13, 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.010
Data source: Dialnet