Contrato de segurocontradicción entre cláusulas, cláusulas oscuras y causa justificada de exclusión de intereses ex artículo 20 LCS

  1. Beatriz Sáenz de Jubera Higuero 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Journal:
Revista Crítica de Derecho Inmobiliario

ISSN: 0210-0444

Year of publication: 2022

Year: 98

Issue: 794

Pages: 3350-3365

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista Crítica de Derecho Inmobiliario

Abstract

In this paper, the main types of clauses included in an insurance contract are examined, from the perspective of this being one of the most frequent and paradigmatic practical examples of adhesion contracts. The most important specific characteristics of these clauses (general, particular, limiting risk and limiting rights) are examined, particularly the formal legal requirements for their control and as protection of the adherent policyholder of the insurance; and likewise it is concluded about the solution to a possible contradiction between clauses or an obscure or confusing wording. Likewise, the existing consolidated jurisprudential doctrine is analyzed in relation to the justifying causes of exemption to the insurer from the payment of default interest of article 20 LCS; causes that are subject to a very restrictive interpretation, especially if the disputed judicial process between the insurer and the injured insured brings about the contradiction or obscurity in the clauses of the contract created by the insurer itself.