El rol de los 4 PL's (Fourth Party Logistics) en las actividades logísticas de las empresas ubicadas en la región Centro - Golfo de México

  1. Miguel Angel Hernández-Apam
  2. Jorge Alberto Durán-Encalada
  3. Carlos Arturo Vega-Lebrún
  4. Elías Olivares-Benítez
Revista:
Nova scientia

ISSN: 2007-0705

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 6

Número: 11

Páginas: 198-227

Tipo: Artículo

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.21640/NS.V6I11.80 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Nova scientia

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

The complexity of managing supply chains has meant that many organizations do not have all the resources and capabilities to achieve the necessary changes. Therefore, this study sets up some questions related to the presence of logistics services providers to attend Mexican companies. To answer these questions, we undertook a survey in a sample of 166 companies that mobilize freight in the Central and Gulf region of Mexico. We applied a variance analysis (ANOVA) to test five hypotheses related to the specialized services for freight transported and logistics services required, the level of satisfaction, and the degree of integration of the providers during the supply of these services. To support these hypotheses, we used concepts derived from the Theory of Transaction Costs and the Resource Based View. As a result, we could observe that when companies require a number of specialized services to transport cargo, logistics services providers do not have the sufficient quality or resources to meet that demand. Regarding the participation of logistics services providers in an integrated manner or not in specialized handling of the transported freight and the number of logistics services, it can be inferred that, on the one hand, the ability of these providers in Mexico is perceived as poor or lacking competitiveness. On the other hand, most likely companies still lack the knowledge or confidence enough to make these 4PL's accountable for supplying a larger number of logistics services, including those specialized for handling the transported freight. It is also likely that, given the operating characteristics of 4PL's, these find limitations in their attempt to link together different specialized service providers in other to fulfill companies' requirements. This means that integrators may have difficulties for finding these partners in Mexico that are able to accompany them in the provision of a wider service to meet the increasingly demanding requirements of enterprises.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Argyres, Nicholas. (1996). Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical decisions. Strategic Management Journal. 129-150
  • Barney, Jay. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management. 17. 99-120
  • Cheon, Myun J., Grover, Varun, James, T., Teng, C.. (1995). Theorical perspectives on the outsourcing of information systems. Journal of Information Systems. 209-219
  • Chopra, Sunil, Meindl, Peter. (2010). Supply Chain management: Strategy, Planning, and Operations. 4th. PearsonPrentice Hall. New Jersey.
  • Clark, Kim B., Fujimoto, Takahiro. (1990). The power of product integrity. Harvard Business Review. 68. 107-118
  • Coase, Ronald. (1937). The nature of the firm. 386-405
  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review. 14. 532-550
  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., Graebner, Melissa E.. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal. 50. 25-32
  • Fabbe-Costes, N., Jahre, M., Roussat, C.. (2008). Towards a Typology of the Roles of Logistics Service Providers as "Supply Chain Integrators". Supply Chain Forum. 9. 28-43
  • Fulconis, Francois, Laurence, Saglietto, Paché, Gilles. (2007). Strategy dynamics in the logistics industry: a transactional center perspective. Management Decision. 45. 104-117
  • Gattorna, John. (2008). Living Supply Chains: How to mobilize the enterprise around delivering what your customer wants. Prentice -Hall.
  • (2004). Third-Party Logistics Study: Results and Findings of the 2004.
  • Grant, Robert M.. (1991). The resource- based theory of competitive advantage: implications for Strategy formulation. California Management Review. 33. 114-135
  • Grant, Robert M.. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 17. 109-122
  • (2008). Competitividad Estatal 2008. Aspiraciones y realidad: las agendas del futuro. Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad. México.
  • Lopez, Alfredo, Rosell, Jorge. (2007). Subcontratación y teoría de los costos de transacción: valoraciones de la incertidumbre para las empresas manufactureras españolas. Revista europea de dirección y economía de la empresa. 16. 9-22
  • (01 d). MARSY Transport et Logistique.
  • McIvor, Ronan. (2000). A practical framework for understanding the outsourcing process. Supply Chain Management. 5. 22-36
  • Rumelt, Richard P.. (1980). Business Policy and Strategic Management. McGraw-hill. New York.
  • Simchi-Levi, David, Kaminski, Philip, Simchi-Levi, Edith. (2007). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and cases. McGraw-Hill.
  • Suárez, Isabel. (1994). El desarrollo de la empresa: un enfoque basado en los recursos. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa. 3. 25-36
  • Williamson, Oliver E.. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies. Analysis and Antitrust Implications. The Free Press. New York.
  • Williamson, Oliver E.. (1979). Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contract Relations. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 22. 3-61
  • Williamson, Oliver E.. (1985). he Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. The Free Press. New York.
  • Williamson, Oliver E.. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. The Free Press. New York.
  • Yin, Robert K.. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage. Beverly Hills^eCA CA.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet