Linguistic and metalinguistic resemblance
-
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
-
Barreras Gómez, María Asunción
-
1
Universidad de La Rioja
info
- Alexandra Bagasheva (ed. lit.)
- Bozhil Hristov (ed. lit.)
- Nelly Tincheva (ed. lit.)
Editorial: John Benjamins
ISSN: 2405-6944
ISBN: 9789027211644, 9789027257369
Año de publicación: 2022
Páginas: 15-41
Tipo: Capítulo de Libro
beta Ver similares en nube de resultadosObjetivos de desarrollo sostenible
Resumen
Similarity judgments are fundamental to cognition. They are part and parcel of our ability as humans to deal with the world around us. This ability shows in how we structure and use language. In this context, this chapter addresses the role of perceived similarity, or resemblance, in language use. It starts from a basic distinction between linguistic and metalinguistic resemblance. The former addresses similarities between entities and states of affairs, while the latter addresses metarepresentational aspects of language, which can be treated in terms of the notion of echo. It further distinguishes three dimensions of linguistic resemblance: attribute-based resemblance, structural resemblance, and high versus low-level resemblance. It pays special attention to the important theoretical status of high-level resemblance as a constraining factor on experiential correlation, which is also active in synesthesia and situation and event-based metaphors. The paper then discusses the role of resemblance in cross-domain relations in irony, hyperbole, and understatement, and it ends with an analysis of the role of metalinguistic resemblance as a pre-requisite for the inferential activity which arises from ironic, parodic, and metonymy-based implicational echoes
Referencias bibliográficas
- Anderson, (1998), A grammar of iconism
- Attardo, (2000), Rask –International Journal of Language and Communication, 12, pp. 3
- 10.1017/CBO9781139057509
- 10.1515/9783110652246-002
- 10.1177/00238309050480030101
- 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00822.x
- 10.1515/langcog.2011.010
- 10.3758/BF03212977
- 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678897
- 10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00003-2
- 10.1111/phc3.12401
- Cruse, (2000), Meaning in language. An introduction to semantics and pragmatics
- Csábi, (2014), The Routledge handbook of stylistics, pp. 206
- 10.7551/mitpress/6590.001.0001
- Galera, (2013), Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 43, pp. 3
- 10.1075/rcl.00049.mas
- 10.7551/mitpress/9629.001.0001
- 10.1017/CBO9781139168779
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001
- 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00282.x
- Goldstone, (2005), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning, pp. 13
- 10.1075/cilt.175.06gra
- 10.2307/414448
- Hasson, (2001), Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society. 42d Annual Meeting, pp. 103
- 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
- 10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3
- 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
- Lakoff, (1980), Metaphors we live by
- Lakoff, (1999), Philosophy in the flesh
- 10.1075/ftl.12
- Panther, (2005), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, pp. 353
- 10.1075/hcp.60.05pan
- 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.009
- 10.1075/ftl.14
- 10.1163/18773109-00601007
- Rodríguez-Pereyra, (2002), Resemblance nominalism. A solution to the problem of universals
- 10.1075/rcl.15.1.01rom
- 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00054-9
- 10.1075/hcp.28.06rui
- 10.1075/ftl.1.09dem
- 10.1017/9781108182324.009
- 10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.002
- 10.1075/ftl.10.17rui
- 10.1007/978-3-030-90688-7_14
- 10.1075/hcp.45
- 10.1075/ftl.9.12rui
- 10.1080/10926488.2019.1611714
- 10.1075/ftl.11.07rui
- 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
- Van Langendonck, (2007), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 394
- 10.1515/cogl.2004.005
- Wilcox, (2018), Ten lectures on Cognitive Linguistics and the unification of spoken and signed languages
- Wilson, (2000), Metarepresentations. A multidisciplinary perspective, pp. 411
- 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001
- 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016
- 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.014
- 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008