Las metodologías activas enriquecidas con tecnología

  1. Palau, Ramon 1
  2. Santiago, Raúl 2
  1. 1 Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    info

    Universitat Rovira i Virgili

    Tarragona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00g5sqv46

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
UTE Teaching & Technology: Universitas Tarraconensis

ISSN: 1135-1438 2385-4731

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Monogràfic

Número: 1

Páginas: 5-16

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: UTE Teaching & Technology: Universitas Tarraconensis

Resumen

El aprendizaje activo, aunque no constituye un elemento nuevo, ha ganado popularidad en los últimos años dentro de los colectivos docentes tanto por la necesidad de buscar respuestas a los nuevos retos como por la incorporación de la tecnología en la educación. Este artículo presenta una aproximación conceptual a las metodologías activas, poniendo en valor la práctica docente basada en evidencias como método y herramienta para la mejora de la educación, realizando para ello un recorrido histórico del concepto, y finalmente destacando cómo estas metodologías y estrategias se enriquecen e implementan con la tecnología. Para finalizar esta presentación al monográfico, se presenta un modelo de éxito de integración de las metodologías activas enriquecidas con tecnología.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akbulut, Y. (2010). A structural model proposal for Turkish faculties of education regarding ICT integration indicators. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(4), 322-334. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cet/issue/25722/271421
  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass.
  • Barnes, K., Marateo, R. C., & Ferris, S. P. (2007). Teaching and Learning with the Net Generation. Innovate: Journal of Online Education: 3 (4) https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ innovate/vol3/iss4/1
  • Begley, D. & Nabi, E. (2012) Design and technology: frenemies against a common foe. Abstracts and Proceedings from the 2012 University & College Designers Association Education Summit. https://www.ucda.com/media/files/files/3629549a/UCDA_ DES_2012_PROCEEDINGS.pdf
  • Broadhurst, A. R., & Darnell, D.K. (1965) An introduction to cybernetics and information theory, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 51:4, 442-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636509382744
  • Brown, G.A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315004914
  • Cen, L., Ruta, D., Powell, L., Hirsch, B. & Ng, J. (2016). Quantitative Approach to Collaborative Learning: Performance Prediction, Individual Assessment, and Group Composition. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 187-225. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/175384/.
  • Clark, A. C., & Ernst, J. V. (2009). Gaming in technology education: The study of gaming can teach life skills for the twenty-first century that employers want... These include analytical thinking, team building, multitasking, and problem solving under duress. The Technology Teacher, 68(5), 21-27. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A193298066/ AONE?u=anon~6ad16bea&sid=googleScholar&xid=fd1c878f
  • Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Harvard Education Press.
  • Cummings, K. & Russell, R. (2012) Design technology and the beginning design student. Abstracts and Proceedings from the 2012 University & College Designers Association Education Summit. https://www.ucda.com/media/files/files/3629549a/UCDA_ DES_2012_PROCEEDINGS.pdf
  • Dagenais, C., Lysenko, L., Abrami, P., Bernard, R., Ramde, J., & Janosz, M. (2012). Use of research-based information by school practitioners and determinants of use: A review of empirical research. Evidence & Policy, 8(3), 285–309. https://doi. org/10.1332/174426412X654031
  • Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual methods in teaching. Dryden Press
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York MacMillan
  • Doyle, T. (2008). Helping Students Learn in a Learner-Centered Environment: A Guide to Facilitating Learning in Higher Education. Stylus Publishing.
  • Flipped Learning Network (2014). The four pillars of FLIP. https://flippedlearning.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/FLIP_handout_FNL_Web.pdf
  • Fraser, J.M., Timan, A.L., Miller, K., Dowd, J.E., Tucker, L., Mazur, E. (2014) Teaching and physics education research: bridging the gap. Rep Prog Phys. 77(3). https://doi. org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/3/032401
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410– 8415. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23/8410.
  • Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The journal of early adolescence, 13(1), 21-43. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0272431693013001002
  • Haskins, R. (2014, December 31). Social programs that work. The New York Times. http:// www.nytimes.com/2015/01/01/opinion/social-programs-that-work.html?_r=0
  • Hattie, J. (2015). The International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Belief. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 32(1), 91-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/ edp.2015.5
  • Honig, M., & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22(4), 578–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807307067
  • Inan, F., & Lowther, D. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40603153
  • Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1975) Learning together and alone: cooperation, competition and individualization. Engle-wood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Kirschner, P.A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2017.06.001
  • Kolada, G. (2013, September 2). Guesses and hype give way to data in study of education. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/science/applying-new-rigorin-studying-education.html?_rD0
  • Lázaro, J. L., & Gisbert, M. (2015). Elaboració d’una rúbrica per avaluar la competència digital del docent. Revista De Ciències De l’Educació, 1(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.17345/ ute.2015.1.648
  • Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2016). How has the Internet reshaped human cognition? The Neuroscientist, 22, 506-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858415595005
  • Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching. Solution Tree Press.
  • Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, lecture? Science, 323(5910), 50-51. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1168927
  • Miranda, H. P., & Russell, M. (2012). Understanding factors associated with teacherdirected student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A structural equation modeling approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 652-666. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01228.x
  • Mogas, J., Palau, R., Fuentes, M., & Cebrián, G. (2021) Smart schools on the way: How school principals from Catalonia approach the future of education within the fourth industrial revolution. Learning Environ Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09398-3
  • Morrison, J. R., Ross, S. M., Corcoran, R. P., & Reid, A. J. (2014). Fostering market efficiency in K-12 ed-tech procurement. Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research and Reform in Education. https://digitalpromise.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/DP_ ImprovingEdTechPurchasing_FullReport.pdf
  • Newton, P. M., & Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-based higher education: Is the learning styles ‘myth’ important? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 444. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2017.00444
  • Palau, R., & Mogas, J. (2019). Systematic literature review for a characterization of the smart learning environments. En: Propuestas multidisciplinares de innovación e intervención educativa, 55-71. https://www.universidadviu.com/download/file/20876
  • Palau, R., Usart, M., & Ucar, M.J. (2019) La competencia digital de los docentes de los conservatorios. Estudio de autopercepción en España. Revista electrónica de LEEME, 44, 24-41. https://doi.org/10.7203/LEEME.44.15709
  • Palau, R., Mogas, J., & Ucar, M.J. (2020) ¿Cómo han gestionado los conservatorios de música españoles los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje durante el confinamiento del COVID-19? Revista electrónica de LEEME. 46, 108-124. https://doi.org/10.7203/ LEEME.46.18110
  • Palau, R., Fuentes, M., Mogas, J., & Cebrián, G. (2021) Analysis of the implementation of teaching and learning processes at Catalan schools during the Covid-19 lockdown. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1) 183-199. https://doi. org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1863855
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently?. On the horizon.
  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  • Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Salemi, M. K. (2010). Developing teacher expertise for economists through a workshop experience. In M. K. Salemi, & W. B. Walstad (Eds.), Teaching innovations in economics: Strategies and applications for interactive instruction (pp. 1-24). Edward Elgar Publishing
  • Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., & Lewis, R. F. (2015). Frequent use of social networking sites is associated with poor psychological functioning among children and adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 380-385. https://doi. org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0055
  • Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Santiago-Campión, R., &Sánchez-Compaña, M.T. (2021) Teacher Digital Literacy: The Indisputable Challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability 13, 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858
  • Santiago, R. & Bergmann, J. (2018). Aprender al revés: Flipped Classroom 3.0 y Metodologías activas en el aula. Paidós Educación.
  • Santiago, R., & Palau, R. (2021) Blended Learning: herramientas y estrategias de evaluación. Cuadernos de pedagogía. 522, 112-119. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/ articulo?codigo=8051355
  • Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10 (1) 4-33. https:// doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
  • Slavin, R.E. (1989) Research on Cooperative Learning: an international perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 33(4), 231-243. https://doi. org/10.1080/0031383890330401
  • Slavin, R. E. (2017). Evidence-based reform in education. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 22(3), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2017.13 34560
  • Slavin, R.E. (2019): How Evidence-Based Reform Will Transform Research and Practice in Education, Educational Psychologist 55(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2 019.1611432
  • Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A. C., & Zhuang, T. (2021). How could evidence-based reform advance education? ECNU Review of Education, 4(1), 7-24. https://doi. org/10.1177/2096531120976060
  • The Academy of Active Learning Arts and Sciences (27 December 2021) Updated Definition of Flipped Learning. https://aalasinternational.org/updated-definition-of-flipped-learning/
  • Van Hout-Wolters B., Simons RJ., & Volet S. (2000). Active Learning: Self-directed Learning and Independent Work. In: Simons RJ., Van der Linden J., & Duffy T. (eds) New Learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47614-2_2
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1925). Principles of social education for deaf and dumb children in Russia. In International Conference on the Education of the Deaf. 70 (5), 227-235.