Gestión integrada de la revisión por pares en el proceso de desarrollo de un proyecto web cuatrimestral

  1. Rosa Arruabarrena 1
  2. José Ángel Vadillo 1
  3. José Miguel Blanco 1
  4. Arturo Jaime 2
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Proceedings:
XXVI Jornadas sobre la Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática (JENUI 2020)
  1. José Manuel Badía Contelles (ed. lit.)
  2. Francisco Grimaldo Moreno (ed. lit.)

ISSN: 2531-0607

Year of publication: 2020

Pages: 197-204

Congress: XXVI Jornadas sobre Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática (Valencia, 8, 9 y 10 de julio de 2020)

Type: Conference paper

Institutional repository: lock_openOpen access Editor

Abstract

This article presents a teaching experience based onthe use of peer review (PR), along with self-assess-ments of the reviewer groups. These reviews are to-tally oriented to the improvement of the quality of thepractical developments of the subject Web Systemswithin the Software Engineering specialty. In thissubject, weekly deliveries of functionalities of a webproject are made and three reviews of the project areplanned. Once the reviews have been performed, wehave found that, assigning developments of similar orhigher quality to reviewers, the interest in carryingout this activity increases considerably. We have alsonoticed that, after the second peer review, in weekseven, the quality of the developments of the groupswith some deficiencies increases in general in the fol-lowing deliveries.Another issue, directly related to reviews, is the iden-tification of groups that must migrate either compul-sorily or optionally to a project selected by teachers,based on the assessments of their own peers. Self-evaluation helps to identify deficiencies with respectto the projects of their reviewed peers, deficienciesthat make it difficult to accomplish the next deliver-ies. Once migration has been performed, it can beseen that those groups have mostly been able to com-plete the deliveries with a higher level of correction.This article describes in detail the planning and devel-opment of the reviews and the quantitative results ob-tained to support the conclusions