Las lógicas de gobierno de lo fronterizo en el espacio Schengenla frontera como estriación

  1. David San Martín Segura 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Zeitschrift:
Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals

ISSN: 2013-035X,  1133-6595

Datum der Publikation: 2019

Titel der Ausgabe: Espacio fronterizo: producción securitaria, vivencia e (in)movilidad (España, Europa y América Latina)

Nummer: 122

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.24241/RCAI.2019.122.2.15 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals

Zusammenfassung

This paper proposes a reflection on borders that considers its operability as a governance space. This reading means transcending the territorial aspect of a border – and its sense of sovereign affirmation – and looking at its functionality in terms of circulation being a matter for government, in what should be called the border’s biopolitical decline. In this sense, government practices that define the border may be read in terms of the striation of space rather than the containment of a territory. The governance problem the border poses is one of reconciling porousness and selectivity. This encourages the construction of “smart borders” via innovations of a technological nature that essentially focus on the filtering capabilities of actuarial and biometric techniques. The paper addresses the transformations of this kind noted in the Schengen Area.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer. El poder soberano y la nuda vida. Valencia: Pretextos, 2003 [1995].
  • Amoore, Louise. The Politics of Possibility. Risk and Security Beyond Probability. Durham y Londres: Duke University Press, 2013.
  • Bærenholdt, Jørgen Ole. «Governmobility: The Powers of Mobility». Mobilities, vol. 8, n.° 1 (2013), p. 20-34.
  • Basilien-Gainche, Marie-Laure. «The EU External Edges: Borders as Walls or Ways?». Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, vol. 2, n.° 1 (2015), p. 97-117.
  • Bigo, Didier. «Globalized (in)Security: the Field and the Ban-opticon». En: Bigo, Didier; Bonelli, Laurent; Guittet, Emmanuel; Olsson, Christian y Tsoukala, Anastassia. Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes: the (in)Security Games. París: L’Harmattan y Centre d’Etudes sur les Conflits, 2006, p. 5-49.
  • Bigo, Didier. «The (in)securitization practices of the three universes of UE border control: Military/Navy–border guards/police–databases analysts». Security Dialogue, vol. 45, n.° 3 (2014), p. 209-225.
  • Burridge, Andrew; Gill, Nick; Kocher, Austin y Martin, Lauren. «Polymorphic borders». Territory, Politics, Governance, vol. 5, n.° 3 (2017), p. 239-251.
  • Cooper, Anthony y Rumford, Chris. «Monumentalising the Border: Bordering Through Connectivity». Mobilities, vol. 8, n.º 1 (2013), p. 107-124.
  • Deleuze, Gilles y Guattari, Felix. Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. Valencia: Pre-textos, 2008 [1988].
  • Fernández Bessa, Cristina y Brandariz García, José Ángel. «Transformaciones de la penalidad migratoria en el contexto de la crisis económica: El giro gerencial del dispositivo de deportación». Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, n.º 4 (2016), p. 1-25.
  • Foucault, Michel. Sécurité, territoire, population. Cours au Collège de France 1977-1978. París: Gallimard, 2004a.
  • Foucault, Michel. Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France 19781979. París: Gallimard, 2004b.
  • Jensen, Anne. «Mobility Regimes and Borderwork in the European Community». Mobilities, vol. 8, n.º 1 (2013), p. 35-51.
  • L’Heuillet, Helen. Baja política, alta policía. Un enfoque histórico y filosófico de la policía. Buenos Aires: Prometeo, 2010.
  • Lyon, David. «Surveillance as social sorting: computer codes and mobile bodies». En: Lyon, David (ed.). Surveillance as Social Sorting. Privacy, risk and digital discrimination. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge, 2003, p. 13-30.
  • Minca, Claudio y Vaughan-Williams, Nick. «Carl Schmitt and the Concept of the Border». Geopolitics, vol. 17, n.º 4 (2012), p. 756-772.
  • Muller, Benjamin. Security, Risk and the Biometric State: Governing Borders and Bodies. Abingdon y Nueva York: Routledge, 2010.
  • Philo, Chris. «“One Must Eliminate the Effects of… Diffuse Circulation [and] their Unstable and Dangerous Coagulation”: Foucault and Beyond the Stopping of Mobilities». Mobilities, vol. 9, n.º 4 (2014), p. 20-34.
  • Radu, Cosmin. «Beyond border-“dwelling”: Temporalizing the border-space through events». Anthropological Theory, vol. 10, n.º 4 (2010), p. 409433.
  • Rahola, Federico. Zone definitivamente temporanee. I luoghi dell’umanità in eccesso. Verona: Ombre corte, 2003.
  • Richardson, Tim. «Borders and Mobilities». Mobilities, vol. 8, n.º 1 (2013), p. 1-6.
  • Salter, Mark B. «When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and citizenship». Citizenship Studies, vol. 12, n.º 4 (2008), p. 365-380.
  • Salter, Mark B. «To Make Move and Let Stop: Mobility and the Assemblage of Circulation». Mobilities, vol. 8, n.º 1 (2013), p. 7-19.
  • Schmitt, Carl. El Nomos de la Tierra en el Derecho de Gentes del “lus publicum europaeum”. Granada: Comares, 2002 [1ª ed. en alemán, 1958].
  • Serrano González, Antonio. Como lobo entre ovejas: soberanos y marginados en Bodin, Shakespeare, Vives. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 1992.
  • Tazzioli, Martina. «Containment Through Mobility and the Internal Frontiers of Europe». Border Criminologies Blog, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford (15 de marzo de 2017) (en línea) [Fecha de consulta: 12.04.2017] https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/ centreborder-criminologies/blog/2017/03/containment
  • Usher, Mark. «Veins of Concrete, Cities of Flow: Reasserting the Centrality of Circulation in Foucault’s Analytics of Government». Mobilities, vol. 9, n.º 4 (2014), p. 550-569.
  • Valverde, Mariana. Chronotopes of Law. Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance. Abingdon y Nueva York: Routledge, 2015.
  • Vaughan-Williams, Nick. «Borders, Territory, Law». International Political Sociology, vol. 2, (2008), p. 322-338.
  • Vaughan-Williams, Nick. «The generalised bio-political border? Re-conceptualising the limits of sovereign power». Review of International Studies, vol. 35, (2009), p. 729-749.
  • Vaughan-Williams, Nick. Border Politics. The Limits of Sovereign Power. Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.
  • Walters, William. «Reflections on Migration and Governmentality». Movements. Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, vol. 1, n.º 1 (2015), p. 1-25.
  • Wilson, Dean y Weber, Leanne. «Surveillance, Risk and Preemption on the Austrialian Border». Surveillance & Society, vol. 5, n.º 2 (2008), p. 124141.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet