Testing urban efficiency wages in France and Spain

  1. Molina, José Alberto
  2. Velilla, Jorge
  3. Giménez-Nadal, José Ignacio
  1. 1 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

  2. 2 BIFI, Zaragoza, Spain
  3. 3 IZA, Bonn, Germany
Revista:
Empirical Economics

ISSN: 0377-7332 1435-8921

Año de publicación: 2020

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1007/S00181-020-01928-X GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Empirical Economics

Repositorio institucional: lockAcceso abierto Editor

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguiar M, Hurst E. Measuring trends in leisure: the allocation of time over five decades. Quart J Econ. 2007;122(3):969–1006.
  • Alonso W. Location and land use. Harvard: Harvard University Press; 1964.
  • Bianchi SM, Milkie MA, Sayer LC, Robinson JP. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Soc Forces. 2000;79(1):191–228.
  • Blau, F. D., and Kahn, L. M. (2016). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. IZA DP No. 9656.
  • Bonke J. Paid work and unpaid work: diary information versus questionnaire information. Soc Indic Res. 2005;70(3):349–68.
  • Brueckner JK, Zenou Y. Space and unemployment: the labor market effects of spatial mismatch. J Labor Econ. 2003;21(1):242–62.
  • Burda MC, Genadek KR, Hamermesh DS. Not working at work: Loafing, unemployment and labor productivity. IZA DP 9095;2015.
  • Craig L. Is there really a second shift, and if so, who does it? A time-diary investigation. Femin Rev. 2007;86:149–70.
  • Dargay JM, Clark S. The determinants of long distance travel in Great Britain. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract. 2012;46(3):576–87.
  • Dickerson A, Hole AR, Munford LA. The relationship between well-being and commuting revisited: does the choice of methodology matter? Region Sci Urban Econ. 2014;49:321–9.
  • Fleisher BM, Wang X. Efficiency wages and work incentives in urban and rural China. J Comp Econ. 2001;29(4):645–62.
  • Frey BS, Stutzer A. Stress that doesn’t pay: the commuting paradox. Scand J Econ. 2008;110(2):339–66.
  • Fu S, Ross SL. Wage premia in employment clusters: How important is worker heterogeneity? J Labor Econ. 2013;31(2):271–304.
  • Garreau J. Edge city: life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday; 1991.
  • Gershuny J. Changing times, work and leisure in post industrial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  • Gimenez-Nadal JI, Molina JA. Regional unemployment, gender, and time allocation of the unemployed. Rev Econ Household. 2014;12(1):105–27.
  • Gimenez-Nadal JI, Molina JA, Velilla J. Spatial distribution of US employment in an urban efficiency wage setting. J Region Sci. 2018;58(1):141–58.
  • Gimenez-Nadal JI, Molina JA, Velilla J. Modelling commuting time in the US: bootstrapping techniques to avoid overfitting. Pap Region Sci. 2020;98(4):1667–84.
  • Gimenez-Nadal JI, Sevilla A. The time-crunch paradox. Soc Indic Res. 2012;102:181–96.
  • Gobillon L, Selod H, Zenou Y. The mechanisms of spatial mismatch. Urban Stud. 2007;44(12):2401–27.
  • Gottholmseder G, Nowotny K, Pruckner GJ, Theurl E. Stress perception and commuting. Health Econ. 2009;18(5):559–76.
  • Grinza E, Rycx F. The impact of sickness absenteeism on firm productivity: new evidence from Belgian matched employer-employee panel data. Ind Rel. 2020;59(1):150–94.
  • Guryan J, Hurst E, Kearney M. Parental education and parental time with children. J Econ Perspect. 2008;22(1):23–46.
  • Hamermesh, D. S. (1990). A general model of dynamic labor demand. National Bureau of Economic Research paper No. w3356.
  • Hamermesh DS. The timing of work over time. Econ J. 1999;109(452):37–66.
  • Hamermesh DS, Lee J. Stressed out on four continents: time crunch or yuppie kvetch? Rev Econ Stat. 2007;89(2):374–83.
  • Hamermesh DS, Stancanelli E. Long workweeks and strange hours. ILR Rev. 2015;68(5):1007–18.
  • Hansson E, Mattisson K, Bjork J, Ostergren P-O, Jakobsson K. Relationship between commuting and health outcomes in a cross-sectional population survey in southern Sweden. BMC Pub Health. 2011;11(1):834.
  • Harms T, Berrigan D, Gershuny J. Daily metabolic expenditures: estimates from US, UK and polish time-use data. BMC Pub Health. 2019;19(2):453.
  • Jara-Díaz S, Rosales-Salas J. Understanding time use: daily or weekly data? Transp Res Part A: Police Pract. 2015;76(1):38–57.
  • Juhn C, McCue K. Specialization then and now: marriage, children, and the gender earnings gap across cohorts. J Econ Perspect. 2017;31(1):183–204.
  • Kahneman D, Krueger AB. Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J Econ Perspect. 2006;20(1):3–24.
  • Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science. 2004;306(5702):1776–80.
  • Killewald A. A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium: marriage, coresidence, biology, and fathers’ wages. Am Soc Rev. 2012;78(1):96–116.
  • Kimmel J, Connelly R. Mothers’ time choices caregiving, leisure, home production, and paid work. J Hum Resour. 2007;42(3):643–81.
  • Kirby DK, LeSage JP. Changes in commuting to work times over the 1990 to 2000 period. Region Sci Urban Econ. 2009;39(4):460–71.
  • Knox PL, McCarthy L. Urbanization: an introduction to Urban Geography. 2005;Prentice Hall.
  • Künn-Nelen A. Does commuting affect health? Health Econ. 2016;25(8):984–1004.
  • Kunze, A. The effect of children on male earnings and inequality. Rev Econ Household. 2019;forthcoming.
  • Leigh JP. Are compensating wages paid for time spent commuting? Appl Econ. 1986;18:1203–13.
  • Levenson A, Zoghi C. The strength of occupation indicators as a proxy for skill. CEO Public 2006;G06-17 (506).
  • Lundberg S, Rose E. Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Lab Econ. 2000;7:689–710.
  • Lundberg S, Rose E. The effects of sons and daughters on men’s labor supply and earnings. Rev Econ Stat. 2002;84(2):251–68.
  • Manning A. Monopsony in motion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2003.
  • Mattingly MJ, Sayer LC. Under pressure: gender differences in the relationship between free time and feeling rushed. J Marr Fam. 2006;68(1):205–21.
  • McQuaid RW, Chen T. Commuting times: the role of gender, children and part-time work. Res Transp Econ. 2012;34(1):66–73.
  • Mills ES. An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. Am Econ Rev. 1967;57(2):197–210.
  • Muller PO. Contemporary suburban America. NJ: Prentice Hall; 1981.
  • Muth RF. Cities and housing: the spatial pattern of urban residential land use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1969.
  • Novaco RW, Gonzalez OI. Commuting and well-being. In: Amichai-Hamburger Y, editor. Technology and psychological well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 174–205.
  • OECD. The pursuit of gender equality: an uphill battle. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.
  • Patacchini E, Zenou Y. Spatial dependence in local unemployment rates. J Econ Geogr. 2007;7(2):169–91.
  • Picard PM, Zenou Y. Urban spatial structure, employment and social ties: European versus American cities. IZA DP 9166;2015.
  • Ross SL, Zenou Y. Are shirking and leisure substitutable? An empirical test of efficiency wages based on Urban Economic Theory. Region Sci Urban Econ. 2008;38(5):498–517.
  • Ruppert P, Stancanelli E, Wasmer E. Commuting, wages and bargaining power. Ann Econ Stat. 2016;95/96:1.
  • Sevilla A, Gimenez-Nadal JI, Gershuny J. Leisure inequality in the United States: 1965–2003. Demography. 2012;49(3):939–64.
  • Shapiro C, Stiglitz JE. Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. Am Econ Rev. 1984;74(3):433–44.
  • Stone AA, Schneider S. Commuting episodes in the United States: their correlates with experiential wellbeing from the American Time Use Survey. Transp Res Part F: Traff Psychol Behav. 2016;42(1):117–24.
  • Van Ommeren JN, Gutierrez-i Puigarnau E. Are workers with a long commute less productive? An empirical analysis of absenteeism. Region Sci Urban Econ. 2011;41(1):1–8.
  • Wener RE, Evans GW, Phillips D, Nadler N. Running for the 7:45: the effects of public transit improvements on commuter stress. Transportation. 2003;30(2):203–20.
  • White MJ. Urban areas with decentralized employment: theory and empirical work. Handb Region Urban Econ. 1999;3:1375–412.
  • Yee-Kan M. Measuring housework participation: the gap between “stylized” questionnaire estimates and diary-based estimates. Soc Indic Res. 2008;86(3):381–400.
  • Zax JS. Compensation for commutes in labor and housing markets. J Urban Econom. 1991;30(2):192–207.
  • Zenou Y. Efficiency wages and unemployment in cities: the case of high-relocation costs. Region Sci Urban Econ. 2006;36(1):49–71.
  • Zenou Y. Urban labor economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
  • Zenou Y, Smith TE. Efficiency wages, involuntary unemployment and urban spatial structure. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 1995;25(4):547–73.