Homofilia, polarización afectiva y desinformación en Twittercaso de estudio sobre la crisis migratoria #Openarms

Bibliographic References

• Alamán, A. P. (2011). El término “inmigrantes” en los titulares de prensa: entre interculturalidad e hibridación. Confluenze. Rivista Di Studi Iberoamericani, 3(1), pp. 188–207. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277272789_El_termino_inmigrantes_en_los_titulares_de_prensa_entre_interculturalidad_e_hibridacion
• Allport, G. W. (1954). Formation of in-groups. In The Nature Of Prejuice (25th Anniv, pp. 28–47). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
• Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 115(37). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115
• Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., & Mcenery, T. (2011). A useful methodological synergy ? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19 (3), pp. 273-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962
• Bakhshandeh, R., Samadi, M., Azimifar, Z., & Schaeffer, J. (2011). “Degrees of Separation in Social Networks.” Pp. 18–23 In Proceedings: The Fourth International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, edited by Daniel Borrajo, Maxim Likhachev, and Carlos Linares Lopez. Palo Alto, California: AAAI.
• Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st International conference on World Wide Web (WWW´12). New York: ACM. pp. 519-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187907
• Bakshy, E. Messing, S. & Adamic, L. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348 (6239), pp. 1130-1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M., (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp.361–362.https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.010033
• Bennett, L., & Iyengar, S., (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of communication, 58 (4), pp. 707-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
• Berti, C. (2020). CarRight-wing populism and the criminalization of sea-rescue NGOs: the 'Sea-Watch 3' case in Italy, and Matteo Salvini's communication on Facebook, Media Culture & Society https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957564
• Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. L., (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer´s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. 61, pp. 951–972.
• Boutyline, A., & Willer, R., (2017). The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers : Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks, Political Psychology 38(3), 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12337
• Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., (2017). Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PNAS 114 (40), pp. 10612-10617. https://dx.doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.1706588114
• Boyd, D. & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐mediated Communication, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), pp. 210-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
• Brader, T. (2006). Campaigns for Hearts and Minds. How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 280 pp.
• Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat. American Journal of Political Science , 52(4), 959–978.
• Brandes, U. (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of mathematical sociology, 25 (2), pp. 163-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249
• Burke, M., & Kraut, R., (2013, February). Using Facebook after losing a job: Differential benefits of strong and weak ties. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, pp. 1419-1430.http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441936
• Castillo de Mesa, J., y García, M. D. L. O. (2017). Identificación de influencers de la intervención social en las redes sociales virtuales. AZARBE, Revista Internacional de Trabajo Social y Bienestar, (6), 81-90.
• Castillo de Mesa, J., Gómez Jacinto, L., López Peláez, A. y Palma García, M.O. (2019a). Building relationships on social networking sites from a social work approach. Journal of Social Work Practice, 33:2, 201-215, https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2019.1608429
• Castillo-de Mesa, J. (2019b). “El Trabajo Social en la era digital”. Madrid: Aranzadi. Thomson Reuters.
• Castillo de Mesa, J. & Gómez Jacinto, L. (2020). Digital competences and skills as key factors between connectedness and tolerance to diversity on social networking sites: case study of social work graduates on Facebook. Current Sociology. (Aceptado, pendiente de publicación).
• Cohen, J. (2001). Defining Identification : A Theoretical Look at the Identification of Audiences With Media Characters, Mass Communication & Society,4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
• Derks, D., Fischer, A.H., & Bos, A.E. (2008). The Role of Emotion in Computer-mediated Communication: A Review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766-785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004
• Dias, P. (2014). From ‘infoxication’to ‘infosaturation’: a theoretical overview of the cognitive and social effects of digital immersion, Ámbitos, 24, pp. 8-12.
• Edunov, S., Diuk, C., Filiz, I.O., Bhagat, S., y Burke, M. (2016). Three and a half degrees of separation. Research at Facebook. Recuperado el 18 de marzo de 2019 de: https//www.research.facebook.com
• European Commission. Eurobarometer interactive. "Fakes news and disinformation online”. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/survey/getsurveydetail/instruments/flash/surveyky/2183
• Fernández, A. Revilla, A. & Andaluz, L. (2020). Analysis of the discursive characterization of migratory stories on Twitter: The Aquarius case. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 77: 1-17
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & M Rao, J., (2016). Filter bubbles, Echo chambers and Online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
• Fortunati, L., Pertierra, R., & Vincent, J. (2012). Migration, Dias -pora and Information Technology in Global Societies. London:Routledge.
• Geertz, C., (1993). Descripción densa: hacia una teoría interpretativa de la cultura. En Bohannan, P. y Glaser, M. (Eds.). Antropología: lecturas. (2.ª ed.). Madrid: McGraw-Hill, pp.547-568.
• Gillani, N.; Yuan, A.; Saveski, M., Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. (2018). Me, my echo chamber, and I. Introspection on social media polarization. Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web. Conference International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp. 823-831.
• Girvan, M., & Newman, M. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, Proc Natl Acad Sci 99, (12), pp. 7821-7826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122653799
• Han, B. (2014a). En el enjambre. Barcelona: Herder Editorial.
• Han, B. (2014b). Psicopolítica. Barcelona: Herder Editorial.
• Hine, C. (2005). Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
• Hjorth, L., (Ed.)., Horst, H., Galloway, A., & Bell, G. (2017). The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673974
• International Organization of Migration. (2015). How the world views migration. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/how_the_world_gallup.pdf
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, Kyu. S. (2009). “Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use” , Journal of communication, 59, (1), pp. 19-39. https://pcl.stanford.edu/research/2009/iyengar-redmedia-bluemedia.pdf
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect , Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization. 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
• Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: redefined. CA: Thousands Oaks Sage.
• Kramer, A.D., Guillory, J.E., & Hancock J.T. (2014). Experimental Evidence of Massive-scale Emotional Contagion through Social Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 111(24), 8.788-8.790.
• Ksiazek, T.B., (2011). A Network Analytic Approach to Understanding Cross-Platform Audience Behavior, 24 (4) Journal of Media Economics, pp. 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2011.626985
• Latapy, M. (2008). “Main-memory triangle computations for very large (sparse (power-law)) graphs”, Theoretical Computer Science, 407, (1–3), pp. 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2008.07.017
• Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party Polarization and Party Structuring of policy attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies, Political Behavior, 24(3), pp. 199–237.
• Mancini, T., Sibilla, F., Argiropoulos, D., Rossi, M., Everri, M., (2019). The opportunities and risks of mobile phones for refugees' experience: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 14(12). https;//10.1371/journal.pone.0225684
• Maya-Jariego, I. (2016). 7 usos del análisis de redes en la intervención comunitaria. Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 27(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.628
• O'Reilly, T. (2006). Qué es Web 2.0. Patrones del diseño y modelos del negocio para la siguiente generación del software. Boletín de la Sociedad de la Información: Tecnología e Innovación, 3, pp. 177-201. https://www.analfatecnicos.net/archivos/97.QueEsWeb2.0.pdf
• Panger, G. (2018). “People Tend to Wind Down, Not Up, When They Browse Social Media” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2 (133): https://doi.org/10.1145/3274402
• Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Toward New Journalism(s). Affective News, Hybridity, and liminal Spaces. Journalism Studies, 27-40.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.890328
• Papacharissi, Z., & Oliveira, F. (2012). Affective News and Net -worked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt.Journal of Communication,62(2), 266-282. http://dx.doi. -org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin UK.
• Sunstein, Cass. R. (2002). “The law of group polarization”, Journal of political philosophy, 10(2). pp. 175-195. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9760.00148
• Sunstein, Cass. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sindermann, C., Elhai, J. D., Moshagen, M., & Montag, C. (2020). Age , gender , personality , ideological attitudes and individual differences in a person ’ s news spectrum : how many and who might be prone to “ fi lter bubbles ” and “ echo chambers ” online ? Heliyon 6(1) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03214
• Sniderman, P., Hagendoorn, L., & Prior, M. (2004). Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers : Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities. American political Science Review, 98 (1): pp.35-49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540400098X
• Sniderman, P., Howell, & G., W. (2017). The Politics of Race, en Sears, DO., Sidanius J., Bobo L.,(Edit). Racialized Politics: Values, Ideology, and Prejudice in American Public Opinion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Urchs, S. Wendlinger, L. Mitrovic, J. et. al. (2019). MMoveT15: A Twitter Dataset for Extracting and Analysing Migration-Movement Data of the European Migration Crisis 2015. Conferencia: 28th IEEE International Conference on Enabling Technologies - Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE) Ubicación: Capri, ITALY Fecha: JUN 12-14. https://pennstate.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/simulating-real-time-twitter-data-from-historical-datasets
• Urueña, A., Ferrari, A., Blanco, D., & Valdecasa, E. (2011). Las Redes Sociales en Internet. Observatorio Nacional de las Telecomunicaciones y de la Sociedad de la Información (ONTSI).Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía. https://www.observatoriodelainfancia.es/oia/esp/documentos_ficha.aspx?id=3614
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Discurso y poder. Contribuciones a los estudios críticos del discurso. Barcelona: Editorial GEDISA.
• Wang, T. (2013). Big data needs thick data. Ethnography Matters, Recuperado en marzo de 2017 de: http://ethnographymatters.net/2013/05/13/big-data-needs-thick-data/
• Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on psychological science, 7 (3), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612442904
• Wojcieszak, M., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). “Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement?” Journal of Communication, 59 (1), pp.40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x.
• Yardi, S. & Boyd, D. (2010). “Tweeting from the town square: Measuring geographic local networks”. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010, pp.194-201.
• Young L. E., Sidnam-Mauch, E., Twyman, M., Wang, L., Jingyi
• Xu, J., Sargent, M., Valente, T.W., Ferrara, E., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. (2021). Disrupting the COVID-19 Misinfodemic With Network Interventions: Network Solutions for Network Problems. American Journal of Public Health. 111, 514-519, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306063