World Perception and High Intellectual Ability: A Comparative Study

  1. Mª Luz Urraca-Martínez
  2. Sylvia Sastre-Riba
  3. Lourdes Viana-Sáenz
Journal:
Psicología educativa

ISSN: 1135-755X

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 27

Issue: 1

Pages: 21-25

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5093/PSED2020A15 WoS: WOS:000599749400003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Psicología educativa

Abstract

From a neuroconstructivist point of view and a developmental model of high intellectual abilities (HIA), the aim of this study is to understand the world perception of high intellectual children, which results from their cognitive complexity and other traits such as their high context sensitivity. An intentional sample of N = 80 boys and girls, of which a group of n = 40 children with HIA (n = 40), aged 7, 9, and 11 years old has been studied and compared with a paired control group of n = 40 students with typical intelligence. BADyG and TCTT tests were administered to determine their intellectual profiles multidimensionally. They were also given the Autobiography Questionnaire Form U in order to capture their world perception. The multivariate analysis of variance (GLM) shows an earlier and more advanced world perception among HIA participants, with higher fluency and abstraction in perceiving problems and solutions compared to subjects with typical intelligence. The coefficient of generalizability is high (.822). The conclusions suggest the relevance to design educational programs for an ethical guide of moral sensitivity differentially wide and early in HIA students.

Funding information

Cite this article as: Urraca-Martínez, M. L., Sastre-Riba, S., & Viana-Sáenz, L. (2021). World perception and high intellectual ability: A comparative study. Psicología Educativa, 27(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2020a15 Funding: This manuscript has been carried out thanks to the I+D+i Project of the Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitivity of the Spanish Government (Excellence Project, EDU2016-78440P), and a contractual agreement with the Ministry of Education, Formation and Employment of the Government of La Rioja (20018-2019). Correspondence: silvia.sastre@unirioja.es (S. Sastre-Riba).

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Ambrose, D., & Cross, T. L. (Eds.) (2009). Morality, ethics and gifted minds. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89368-6
  • Ambrose, D., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.) (2016). Giftedness and talent in the 21st century: Adapting to the turbulence of globalization (Vol. 10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-503-6
  • Anguera, M. T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., & Losada, J. L. (2001). Observation design, a key issue in the process of observation methodology. Methodology of Behaviour, 3(2), 135-160.
  • Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. (Eds.) (2010). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree.
  • Beltrán, J., & Pérez, L. (1993). Identificación. In L. Pérez (Coord.), Diez palabras clave en superdotados (pp. 137-168). Verbo Divino.
  • Castelló, A. (2008). Bases intelectuales de la excepcionalidad: un esquema integrador. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 66(240), 203-220.
  • Castelló-Tarrida, A., Cladellas-Pros, R., & Limonero-García, J. (2019). El papel de las estructuras del conocimiento en la excelencia adulta. Aproximación desde el funcionamiento experto. [The role of knowledge structures in adult excellence. An approach from expert functioning.] Comunicar, 60,49-58. https://doi.org/10.3916/C60-2019-05
  • Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4067.1275
  • Dai, D. Y. (2017). Envisioning a new foundation for gifted education: Evolving complexity theory of talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 6(3), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701837
  • Daniels, S., & Piechowski, M. M. (2009). Living with intensity: Understanding the sensitivity, excitability, and emotional development of gifted children, adolescents, and adults. Great Potential Press. https://doi. org/10.1037/e676842011-002
  • Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (1994) Educational psychology: Classroom connections. Merrill-MacMillan Publishing Co.
  • Fischman, W., & Gardner, H. (2009). Implementing GoodWork programs: Helping students to become ethical workers. Knowledge Quest, 37(3), 74-79.
  • Gibson, K. L., Rimmington, G. M., & Landwehr-Brown, M. (2008). Developing global awareness and responsible world citizenship with global learning. Roeper Review, 30, 11-23. https://doi. org/10.1080/02783190701836270
  • Hume, M. (2000). Los alumnos intelectualmente bien dotados. Edebé.
  • Lovecky, D. V. (1997). Identity development in gifted children: Moral sensitivity. Roeper Review, 20(2), 90-94. https://doi. org/10.1080/02783199709553862
  • Piechowski, M. M. (2003). Emotional and spiritual giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), The handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.) (pp 404-416). Allyn & Bacon.
  • Piechowski, M. M. (2009). The inner world of the young and bright. In D. Ambrose & T. L. Cross (Eds.), Morality, ethics and gifted minds (pp.177- 194). Springer. https:/doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89368-6
  • Ramos, F. J., Hernández-Mendo, A., Pastrana, J. L., & Blanco-Villaseñor, A. (2012). SAGT: software para la aplicación de la teoría de la generalizabilidad (Proyecto fin de carrera para la titulación de Ingeniería Técnica en Informática de Gestión de la Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Informática). Universidad de Málaga, España.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include cocognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208400109
  • Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150-159. https://doi. org/10.1177/0016986212444901
  • Roeper, A. (2008). Global awareness and gifted children: Its joy and history. Roeper Review, 30(1), 8-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190701836254
  • Roeper, A., & Silverman, L. K. (2009). Giftedness and moral promise. In D. Ambrose & T. Cross (Eds.), Morality, ethics and gifted minds (pp.251- 264). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89368-6_19
  • Sastre-Riba, S. (2008). Niños con altas capacidades y su funcionamiento cognitivo diferencial. Revista de Neurología, 46(s1), 11-16. https://doi. org/10.33588/rn.46S01.2008008
  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). Learned optimism. Pocket Books. Silverman, L. K. (1998). Through the lens of giftedness. Roeper Review, 20(3), 204-210. https:/doi.org/ 10.1080/02783199809553892
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2012). Giftedness and ethics. Gifted Education International, 8(3), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429411435050
  • Terman, L. M. (1925) Genetic studies of genius. Stanford University Press.
  • Tirri, K. (2010). Combining excellence and ethics: Implications for the education of the gifted, Roeper Review, 33(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/02783193.2011.530207
  • Tirri, K. (2012). What kind of learning environment supports learning of gifted students in science? In A. Ziegler, Ch. Fischer, H. Stoeger, & M. Reutlinger (Eds.), Gifted education as a life-long challenge: Essays in honour of Franz J. Mönks (pp. 13-24). Lit Verlag.
  • Tirri, K. (2016). Holistic perspectives on gifted education for the 21st Century. In, R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Giftedness and talent in the 21st century. Adapting to the turbulence of globalization, (pp.101- 110). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-503-6_6
  • Tirri, K., & Pehkonen, L. (2002). The moral reasoning and scientific argumentation of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13(3), 120-129. https:/doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2002-374
  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Norms and technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.
  • Yuste, C., Martínez, R., & Galve, J. L. (1988). Batería de aptitudes diferenciales y generales. CEPE.