The lexical representation of English verbs of action. Complex predicates and structures

  1. Ojanguren López, Ana Elvira 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

ISSN: 1886-2438

Año de publicación: 2019

Número: 14

Páginas: 131-140

Tipo: Artículo

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.4995/RLYLA.2019.11080 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Postprint lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This article aims at proposing a lexical representation for a set of English verbs of action. The analysis is carried out on the grounds of Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) and includes aspects like Aktionsart type, macrorole and syntactic function assignment, linking, as well as nexus and juncture. Against this background, the meaning components of the verbs in question are analysed, in such a way that a logical structure based on a lexical representation is defined for each verbal class. Conclusions fall on both the descriptive and the theoretical side. From the descriptive point of view, Fail and Try verbs constitute a unified verbal class as regards their meaning components and grammatical behaviour and, thus, they are represented by means of a unified logical structure. Conversely, Prevent verbs and Forbid verbs require different logical structures that account for their divergent grammatical behaviour, corresponding to the Causative Activity and Causative Achievement Aktionsart types respectively. On the theoretical side, the logical structures of End verbs, Fail verbs, Try verbs and Prevent verbs stick to the canonical representations of RRG, while those of Hinder verbs and Refrain verbs require complex predicates and complex logical structures which allow to incorporate extra meaning components and to combine different Aktionsart types.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Cortés Rodríguez, F. & M. A. Martín Díaz. (2003). “The meaning-syntax interface of writing verbs: templates, constructions and linking rules within a lexical grammar of Old English verbal predicates”, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 47: 13-35.
  • Cortés Rodríguez, F. & M. González Orta. (2006). “Anglo-Saxon verbs of sound: Semantic architecture, lexical representation and constructions”, Studia Anglica Poznaniensia, 42: 249-284.
  • Faber, P. & R. Mairal. (1999). Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs. Berlin: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800623
  • Foley, W. & R. Van Valin. (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • García Pacheco, C. L. (2013). Los verbos de sentimiento en inglés antiguo: Arquitectura léxica e interfaz semánticagramática. PhD Dissertation. Universidad de La Laguna.
  • García Pacheco, L. M. (2013). El dominio verbal de la existencia en anglosajón. Análisis semántico-sintáctico. PhD Dissertation. Universidad de La Laguna.
  • González Orta, M. (2002). “Linking syntax and semantics in Old English verbs of warning”, Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 10: 157-182.
  • González Orta, M. (2003). “The Old English verbs of smell perception and emission: Analysis of the interface of their semantic and syntactic representation”, SELIM, 12: 33-48.
  • González Orta, M. (2004). Diccionario sintáctico del léxico verbal del inglés antiguo: verbos de habla, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de La Laguna.
  • González Orta, M. (2005). “The interrelation of semantic structure and syntactic variation in Old English verb classes: Catalogue of syntactico-semantic constructions”, Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 18: 111-128. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2005.18.05
  • González Orta, M. (2006). “The resultative construction in Old English: Towards a semantic network of verb classes”, Studia Neophilologica, 78: 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393270601022282
  • Koopman, W. F. (1992). “The study of Old English syntax and the Toronto Dictionary of Old English”, Neophilologus, 76/4: 605-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209877
  • Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Sosa Acevedo, E. (2007). “The semantic representation of Anglo-Saxon (ge)séon and (ge)lócian: syntactic evidence for meaning decomposition”, RÆL. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 6: 92-107.
  • Sosa Acevedo, E. (2009). “Lexical classes and the conative construction in Old English”, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 45: 69-90. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10121-009-0005-6
  • Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578
  • Van Valin, R. (2014). Some questions concerning accomplishments. Lecture delivered at the 2014 Symposium on Verbs, Clauses and Constructions, held at the University of La Rioja.
  • Van Valin, R. & R. LaPolla. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet