Clasificación de las empresas familiares en base a sus valores

  1. Elena Santos Martos 1
  2. Juan Carlos Ayala Calvo 2
  3. J. Eduardo Rodríguez Osés 2
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Journal:
Cuadernos de economía: Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance

ISSN: 2340-6704,  0210-0266

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 42

Issue: 118

Pages: 70-80

Type: Article

DOI: 10.32826/CUDE.V42I118.74 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openBiblos-e Archivo editor

More publications in: Cuadernos de economía: Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance

Abstract

amily businesses are numerous and different, their heterogeneity show a multiplici-ty of objectives and results. Traditionally family firms are classified in terms of their structure, size, ownership, etc.; but few studies have been focusing on the values of the family business, it ́s a key aspect that determines the degree of familiarity of these organizations. We propose a own typology centered on the values of the dominant family group on three key dimensions: ownership, management and continuity. The study of these dimensions allows us to classify the Family Business (FB.) into three groups: pure, mixed (owner and executive) and profes-sionalized. This classification is useful to homogenize the findings of research on FB. Given the importance of this classification, we wanted to confirm whether this type can be applied to business reality in Spain and we have confirmed that the degree of familiarity can help us classify these organizations.

Bibliographic References

  • Allouche, J.; Amann, B.; Jaussaud, J. y Kurashina, J., 2008. The Impact of Family Control on the Performance and Financial Characteristics of Family Versus Nonfamily Businesses in Japan: A Matched-Pair Investigation, Business Review. 21(4), 315-329.
  • Basco, R., 2013. The family's effect on family firm performance: A model testing the demographic and essence Approaches, Journal of Family Business Strategy. 4, 42-66.
  • Cecilia, E. 2005. Psicología positiva y emociones positivas, American Psychology. 33(4), 1-30.
  • Chirico, F. y Baù, M., 2014. Is the family an asset or liability for firm performance? The moderating role of environmental dynamism, Journal of Small Business Management. 52(2), 201-225.
  • Chrisman, J.J.; Chua, J. y Sharma, P., 2005. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm, Entrepreneurship: Theory and practice. 9(5), 555-576.
  • Chua, J.; Crisman, J y Sharma, P., 1999. Defining family business by behavior, Entrepreneurship: Theory and practice. 23(4), 19-39.
  • Colli, A., 2012. Contextualizing performances of family firms: the perspective of business history, Family Business Review. 25(3), 243-257.
  • Corona, J. y Del Sol, I (2016). La Empresa Familiar en España (2015); Instituto de la Empresa Familiar: Barcelona, Spain, 2016; Disponible en: http://www.iefa-miliar.com/upload/documentos/ubhiccx9o8nnzc7i.pdf (Descargado el 20 de octubre de 2017).
  • Craig, J.B.; Dibrell, C. y Davis, P.S., 2008. Leveraging Family-Based Brand Identity to Enhance Firm Competitiveness and Performance in Family Businesses, Journal of Small Business Management. 46(3), 351-371.
  • Dekker, J.C.; Lybaert, N.; Steijvers, T.; Depaire, B. y Mercken, R., 2012. Family Firm Types Based on the Professionalization Construct: Exploratory Research, Family Business Review. 26(1), 81-99.
  • Díaz de la Rada, V., 2002. Técnicas de análisis multivariante para investigación social y comercial. Ra-Ma, (Ed.), Madrid.
  • Dyer, G., 2006. Examining the "Family Effect" on Firm Performance, Family Business Review. 19, pp. 253-273
  • Dyer, G., 2003. The Family: The Missing Variable in Organizational Research, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 27(4), 401-416.
  • Gallo, M. A., 2004. Tipologías de las empresas familiares, Revista Empresa y Humanismo. 7(2), 241-258.
  • Gersick, K.E.; Davis, J.A.; McCollon, M. y Lansberg, I., 1997. Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business, Ed. Harvard Business School Press, MA, USA.
  • Gibb, Jr. W., 2003. Toward a theory of family performance: A typology of family firms based on Agency Theory and the Resource-Based View of the Firm, Ed. Marriot School of Management, Brigham.
  • Ginalski, S., 2010. Business elites and family networks: The case of the Swiss metallurgy industry during the 20th century. Paper presentado en el European Business History Association Conference, Glasgow, Inglaterra.
  • Gómez-Betancourt, G., 2004. Typologies of family business: A conceptual framework based on trust and strategic management. Family Business Casebook Annual, 1, 27-52.
  • Habbershon, T. y Williams, M.L., 1999. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms, Family Business Review. 12(1), 1-21.
  • Kammerlander, N; Sieger, P.; Voordeckers, W. y Zellweger, T., 2015. Value creation in family firms: A model of fit, Journal of Family Business Strategy. 6, 63-72.
  • Memili, E., Zellweger, T.M. y Fang, H-C., 2013. The determinants of family owner-managers' affective organizational commitment, Family Relations. 62(3), 443-456.
  • O'Boyle, E.H.; Rutherford, M.W. y Pollack, J.M., 2010. Examining the relation between ethical focus and financial performance in family firms: an exploratory study, Family Business Review. 23(4), 310-326.
  • Perkins, G., 1992. Razones de permanencia del personal no familiar, miembro del equipo directivo en las empresas familiares, tesis doctoral inédita, IESE, Barcelona.
  • Ripollés, M. y Blesa, A., 2006. Redes personales del empresario y orientación emprendedora en las nuevas empresas, Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa. 26, 73-94.
  • Rojo, A.A; Diéguez, J. y López, P., 2011. Importancia del concepto de empresa familiar en investigación: utilización de la base de datos SABI para su clasificación, Revista de empresa familiar. 1(1), 53-67.
  • Sharma, P., 2004. An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and direction for the future, Family Business Review. 12(1), 1-36.
  • Sharma, P. y Nordqvist, M., 2008. A classification scheme for family firms: From family values to effective governance to firm performance. En J. Tàpies y J. Ward (Eds.), Family values and value creation: The fostering of enduring values within family-owned businesses (71-101). Ed. Palgrave Macmillan Hampshire, Inglaterra.
  • Swoboda, B. y Olejnik, E., 2013. A taxonomy of small- and medium-sized international family firms, Journal of International Entrepreneurship. 11(2), 130-157.
  • Tsang, E., 2002. Learning from overseas venturing experience. The case of Chinese family business, Journal of business venturing. 17(1), 21-40.
  • Ussman, A.M; Jiménez, J.J. y García, P.M., 2001. Una reflexión sobre el proceso de dirección estratégica de la empresa familiar: propuesta de un modelo, Actas del I Congreso Nacional de Investigación sobre la Empresa Familiar, OPVI, Valencia, 347-372.
  • Wang, C. L., 2008. Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 32(4), 635-656.
  • Westhead, P., y Howorth, C., 2006. Ownership and Management Issues Associated With Family Firm Performance and Company Objective, Family Business Review, 19(4), 301-316.
  • Yu, A.; Lumpkin, G.T; Sorenson, R.L.; Brigham, K.H., 2012. The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables, Family Business Review. 25(1), 33-57.
  • Zahra, S.A., 2005: Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms, Family Business Review. 13(1), 23-40.
  • Zellweger, T.M; Nason, R.S. y Nordqvist, M., 2012. From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families introducing family entrepreneurial orientation, Family Business Review. 25(2), 136-155.
Data source: Dialnet