Recategorization in the recursive formation of old english nouns and adjectives

  1. Vea, Raquel
Revista:
RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 1885-9089

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 14

Número: 1

Páginas: 67-81

Tipo: Artículo

WoS: WOS:000422585700005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

The aim of this paper is to identify the types of recategorization that arise in the recursive formation of Old English nouns and adjectives by means of prefixation and suffixation. The first step of this analysis is to isolate the recursive adjectival and nominal formations, for which the lexical database of Old English Nerthus (www.nerthusproject.com) is used. Out of a total of nearly 7,500 affixed nouns and adjectives, there are 388 recursive formations. The main conclusion of this article is that recursivity in the formation of adjectives and nouns crucially depends on the noun as source category and the adjective as path category. As a general rule, the derivation proceeds as follows: noun > adjective > noun / adjective.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, S. R. 1992. A morphous-Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  • Beard, R. 1995. Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Beard, R. 1998. Derivation. In A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. 44-65. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Beard, R. and M. Volpe. 2005. Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. In P. Stekauer and R. Lieber (eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation. 189-205. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Booij, G. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University.
  • Booij, G. 2012. Construction Morphology and the interaction of syntax and word formation. In A. Fabrégas, E. Felíu, J. Martín and J. Pazó (eds.), Los límites de la morfología. Estudios ofrecidos a Soledad Varela Ortega. 105-113. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  • Dik, S. 1997a (1989). The Theory of Functional Grammar I: The Structure of the Clause. Edited by K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Dik, S. 1997b. The Theory of Functional Grammar II: Complex and Derived Constructions. Edited by K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Foley, W. and R. Van Valin. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • González Torres, E. 2010. The Continuum Inflection-Derivation and the Old English suffixes -a, -e, -o, -u. ATLANTIS 32.1: 103-122.
  • Hengeveld, K., and J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jember, G. K., J. C. Carrell, R. P. Lundquist, B. M. Olds and R. P. Tripp. 1975. English-Old English, Old English-English Dictionary. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Kastovsky, D. 1992. Semantics and vocabulary. In R. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066. 290-408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lass, R. 1994. Old English: a Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Manova, S. 2005. Derivation versus inflection in three inflecting languages. In W. Dressler et al. (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations: selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004. 233-252. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2008. Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology. In R. D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. 119-145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2009. A Typology of Morphological Constructions. In C. Butler and J. Martín Arista (eds.), Deconstructing Constructions. 85-115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2011. Projections and constructions in functional morphology: the case of HRĒOW. Language and Linguistics 12/2: 393-425.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2012. The Old English Prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32/4: 411-433.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2013. Recursivity, derivational depth and the search for Old English lexical primes. Studia Neophilologica 85/1: 1-21.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2014. Noun layers in Old English. Mismatches and asymmetry in lexical derivation. Nordic Journal of English Studies 13(3): 160-187.
  • Pounder, A. 2000. Processes and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Pustejovsky, J. 1991. The Generative Lexicon. Computational Linguistics 17.4.
  • Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
  • Quirk R. and C. L. Wrenn. 1994 (1955). An Old English Grammar. DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press.
  • Ricca, D. 2005. Cumulative exponence involving derivation: some patterns for an uncommon phenomenon. In W. Dressler et al. (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations: selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004. 197-213. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Torre Alonso, R. 2009. Morphological Process Feeding in the Formation of Old English Nouns: Zero Derivation, Affixation and Compounding. PhD Dissertation, Department of Modern Languages, University of La Rioja.
  • Torre Alonso, R. 2010. Morphological process feeding in the formation of Old English nouns. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7: 57-69.
  • Torre Alonso, R. 2011a. The Morphological Structure of Old English Complex Nouns. Atlantis 33.1: 127–146.
  • Torre Alonso, R. 2011b. Nominal Affix Combinations in Old English: Distribution and Restrictions. RESLA 24: 257-278.
  • van der Hulst, H. 2010. Recursion and Human Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Van Valin, R. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van Valin, R., and R. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vea Escarza, R. 2014. Split and Unified Functions in the Formation of Old English Nouns and Adjectives. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 9: 106-116
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet