A lexical constructional approach to illocutionary constructionsthe case of requests

  1. Campo Martínez, Nuria del 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

ISSN: 1886-2438

Año de publicación: 2011

Número: 6

Páginas: 83-94

Tipo: Artículo

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.4995/RLYLA.2011.895 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

The present paper focuses on the description of illocutionary constructions at level 3 of the Lexical Constructional Model (Ruiz de Mendoza & Mairal, 2007, 2008; Mairal & Ruiz de Mendoza, 2008, 2009). Level 3 illocutionary constructions will be shown as providing structure in terms of the interplay between construal operations and general social conventions. We will present an inventory of realizational procedures that give linguistic form to requests and differ in their potential to instantiate the features that characterize this illocutionary type. It is our aim to show that the realization of requests is based on the use of linguistic mechanisms that exhibit different degrees of instantiation potential for the pragmatic basis of requests. Such basis will be formulated on the basis of Ruiz de Mendoza and Baicchi�s Cost-Benefit Cognitive Model and will be shown to lie at the core of the constructional composition of requests.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning. The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dik, S.C. (1989). The Theory of Functional Grammar. The structure of the clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Dik, S.C. (1997). The Theory of Functional Grammar. Complex and derived constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Fillmore, C.J. & Kay, P. & O’ Connor, M.C. (1988). “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions. The case of ‘let alone’”. Language 64: 501–538.
  • Halliday, Michael A.K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edition. London: Hodder Arnold.
  • Kay, P. & Fillmore, C.J. (1999). “Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction”. Language 75: 1–33.
  • Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
  • Mairal Usón, R. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2008). “New challenges for lexical representation within the Lexical-Constructional Model”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57: 137–158.
  • Mairal Usón, R. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2009). “Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction”. Deconstructing constructions. Eds., C. S. Butler & J. M. Arista. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 153–198. Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. (1998). “A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 755–769.
  • Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. (2003). “Metonymies as natural inference and activation schemas: The case of dependent clauses as independent speech acts”. Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Eds., K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 127–147.
  • Pérez Hernández, L. (2001). Illocution and Cognition: a Constructional Approach. Logroño: University of La Rioja, University Press.
  • Pérez Hernández, L. & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. (2002). “Grounding, Semantic Motivation, and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Directive Speech Acts”. Journal of Pragmatics 34- 3: 259–284.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. (1999). “La ilocución y la gramática”. Nuevas perspectivas en Gramática Funcional. Eds., C. Butler, R. Mairal, J. Martín & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza. Barcelona: Ariel, 99–171
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. (2007). “High level cognitive models: in search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior”. In Krzysztof Kosecki, ed. Perspectives on metonymy. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 11–30.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. & Baicchi, A. (2007). “Illocutionary constructions: Cognitive motivation and linguistic realization”. Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects. Eds., K. Istvan & L. Horn. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 95–128.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. & Mairal Usón, R. (2007). “High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction”. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Lexicon and Grammar. Eds., G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 33–49.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. & Mairal Usón, R. (2008). “Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: an introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model”. Folia Linguistica 42: 355–400.
  • Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sperber, D. & Deirdre Wilson. (1995). Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 2nd ed.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet