The derivational map of Old English and the limits of gradual derivation

  1. Miguel Lacalle Palacios 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    GRID grid.119021.a

Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

ISSN: 1886-2438

Year of publication: 2013

Issue: 8

Pages: 110-119

Type: Article

Export: RIS
DOI: 10.4995/rlyla.2013.1308 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor
Institutional repository: lock_openOpen access editor lock_openOpen access postprint


This journal article deals with Old English word-formation as represented by a derivational map. In a derivational map, lexical derivation applies gradually, so that a process only occurs at a time and affixes are attached one by one. This theoretical and methodological stance holds good for most derivations but there is also evidence of non-gradual formations with the prefixes .-, ge-, or-, twi-, ðri-, and un-. After discussing the relevant derivatives with each of the aforementioned affixes, the conclusions are reached that non-gradual formations arise in frequent word-formation patterns; they constitute, with few exceptions, an adjectival phenomenon; and they are mainly associated with secondary derivational functions. Regarding the derivational map of Old English, the conclusion is drawn that non-gradual formations have to be represented by means of reconstructed forms so that each node represents one lexeme and each edge marks one morphological process.

Bibliographic References

  • Beard, R. and Volpe, M. (2005). “Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology”, in P. Stekauer and R. Lieber (eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 189-205.
  • Bosworth, J. and T. N. Toller. 1973 (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark Hall, J. R. 1996 (1896). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Haselow, A. (2011). Typological Changes in the Lexicon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Kastovsky, D. (2006). “Typological Changes in Derivational Morphology”, in A. van Kemenade and B. Los (eds.), The Handbook of The History of English. Oxford: Blackwell, 151-177.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2008). “Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology”, in R. Van Valin (ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics- Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119-145.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2009). “A Typology of Morphological Constructions”, in C. Butler and J. Martín Arista (eds.), Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 85-115.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2010a). “Lexical negation in Old English”, NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution 60/61: 89-108.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2010b). “OE strong verbs derived from strong verbs”, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7: 36-56.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2011a). “Projections and Constructions in Functional Morphology. The Case of Old English HRĒOW”, Language and Linguistics 12/2: 393-425.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2011b). “Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English”, English Studies 92/3: 323-344.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2011c). “Morphological relatedness and zero alternation in Old English”, in P. Guerrero Medina (ed.), Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. London: Equinox, 339-362.
  • Martín Arista, J. (Forthcoming-a). “The Old English Prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal”, Australian Journal of Linguistics.
  • Martín Arista, J. (Forthcoming-b). “Lexical database, derivational map and 3D representation”, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada.
  • Martín Arista, J. (Forthcoming-c). “Recursivity, derivational depth and the search for Old English lexical primes”, Studia Neophilologica.
  • Martín Arista, J. (Forthcoming-d). “Noun layers in Old English”. Pounder, A. (2000). Processes and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Sweet, H. 1976 (1896). The Student´s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van Valin, R. and LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.