Split and unified functions in the formation of old English nouns and adjectives

  1. Raquel Vea Escarza 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Journal:
Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

ISSN: 1886-2438

Year of publication: 2014

Issue: 9

Pages: 106-116

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4995/RLYLA.2014.2086 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Abstract

This journal article draws a distinction between the split and unified functions obtaining in the formation of Old English nouns and adjectives. The starting point of the discussion is an enlarged inventory of lexical functions that draw on Meaning- Text Theory and structural-functional grammars and explain the change of meaning caused by prefixation and suffixation in Old English. The extended inventory of lexical functions consists of 33 functions and has been applied to ca. 7,500 affixed nouns and adjectives extracted from the lexical database Nerthus (www.nerthusproject.com). The distinction between split and unified functions, in such a way that the former can be realized by both prefixes and suffixes and the latter by either prefixation or suffixation, allows for some generalizations. Firstly, the analysis proves that there are more functions involved in prefixation than in suffixation. Secondly, prefixation is meaning oriented while suffixation is class oriented.

Bibliographic References

  • Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Beard, R. and Volpe, M. (2005). “Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology”, in P. Stekauer and R. Lieber (eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 189-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_8
  • Bosworth, J. and Toller, T. N. (1973). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Butler, C. (2003a). Structure and Function: A Guide to the Three Major Structural-Functional Theories, Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Butler, C. (2003b). Structure and Function: A Guide to the Three Major Structural-Functional Theories, Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Clark Hall, J. R. (1996). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Dik, S. (1997a). The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Edited by K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Dik, S. (1997b). The Theory of Functional Grammar, Vol. 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Edited by K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Foley, W. and Van Valin, R. (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (2002). “Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar”, in C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka (eds.), Meaning and Universal Grammar. Theory and Empirical Findings (Volume I). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 41-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.60.08god
  • Guarddon Anelo, M. C. (2009a). “The Natural Semantic Metalanguage of Old English Compound Adpositions”, ES. Revista de Filología Inglesa, 30: 61-84.
  • Guarddon Anelo, M. C. (2009b). “Un análisis de las propiedades combinatorias de los primitivos semánticos a través de las adposiciones complejas en inglés antiguo”, Revista Española de Lingüística, 39/2: 93-122.
  • Haselow, A. (2011). Typological Changes in the Lexicon. Analytic Tendencies in English Noun Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110238211
  • Healey, A. diPaolo, ed. (2008). The Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form A-G. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.
  • Healey, A. diPaolo, (ed.), with J. Price Wilkin and X. Xiang. (2004). The Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.
  • Heidermanns, F. (1993). Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110871616
  • Hengeveld, K. and Lachlan Mackenzie, J. (2008). Functional Discourse Grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
  • Holthausen, F. (1963). Altenglisches etymologysches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
  • Kastovsky, D. (1992). “Semantics and vocabulary”, in R. M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 290-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.006
  • Kastovsky, D. (2006). “Typological Changes in Derivational Morphology”, in A. van Kemenade and B. Los (eds.), The Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Blackwell publishing. pp. 151-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch7
  • Lacalle Palacios, M. (2011). “The derivational map of Old English and the limits of gradual derivation”, Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 6: 243-259.
  • Lass, R. (1994). Old English: a Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621000
  • Martín Arista, J. (2008). “Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology”, in R. D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 119-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.12mar
  • Martín Arista, J. (2009). “A Typology of Morphological Constructions”, in C. Butler and J. Martín Arista (eds.), Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 85-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.107.06aty
  • Martín Arista, J. (2010a). “OE strong verbs derived from strong verbs”, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 7: 36-56.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2010b). “Lexical negation in Old English”, NOWELE (North-Western European Language Evolution), 60/61: 89-108.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2011a). “Morphological relatedness and zero alternation in Old English”, in P. Guerrero Medina (ed.), Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. Sheffield: Equinox. pp. 339-362.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2011b). “Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English”, English Studies, 92/3: 323-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2011.564776
  • Martín Arista, J. (2011c). “Projections and constructions in functional morphology: the case of HRĒOW», Language and Linguistics, 12/2: 393-425.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2012a). “The Old English Prefix ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal”, Australian Journal of Linguistics, 32/4: 411-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2012.744264
  • Martín Arista, J. (2012b). “Morfología flexiva en RRG”, in R. Mairal, L. Guerrero and C. González (eds.), El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. Madrid: Akal Universitaria. pp. 43-58.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2013). “Recursivity, derivational depth and the search for Old English lexical primes”, Studia Neophilologica, 85/1: 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2013.771829
  • Martín Arista, J. and Cortés Rodríguez, F. (Forthcoming). “From directionals to telics: meaning construction, wordformation and grammaticalization in Role and Reference Grammar”, in M. A. Gómez González, F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and F. Gonzálvez García (eds.), Form and function in language: Functional, cognitive and applied perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Martín Arista, J. and Martín de la Rosa, V. (2006). “Old English Semantic Primes: Substantives, Determiners and Quantifiers”, ATLANTIS, 17: 9-28.
  • Mateo Mendaza, R. (2013). “The Old English exponent for the semantic prime TOUCH. Descriptive and methodological questions”, Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33/4: 449-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2013.857574
  • Mel’čuk, I. (1989). “Semantic primitives from the Viewpoint of the Meaning-Text Linguistic Theory”, Quaderni di semantica, 10/1: 65-102.
  • Mel’čuk, I. (1996). “Lexical Functions: A Tool for the Description of Lexical Relations in the Lexicon”, in L. Wanner (ed.), Lexical functions in lexicography and natural language processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 37-102.
  • Mel’čuk, I. (2006). Aspects of the Theory of Morphology. Edited by D. Beck. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Mel’čuk, I., Clas, A. and Arbatchewsky-Jumarie, N. (1984–99). Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain: recherches lexico-sémantiques I–IV. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal. Orel, V. (2003). A Handbook of Germanic Etymology. Leiden: Brill.
  • Pokorny, J. (1989). Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.
  • Pounder, A. (2000). Processes and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110814378
  • Reibel, D. A. (1963). A Grammatical Index to Compound Nouns of Old English Prose. Ph.D. dissertation. Bloomington: Indiana University.
  • Seebold, E. (1970). Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110821956
  • Sweet, H. (1976). The Student´s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Torre Alonso, R. (2009). Morphological Process Feeding in the Formation of Old English Nouns: Zero Derivation, Affixation and Compounding. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Modern Languages, University of La Rioja.
  • Torre Alonso, R. (2011a). “The Morphological Structure of Old English Complex Nouns”, ATLANTIS, 33/1: 127-146.
  • Torre Alonso, R. (2011b). “Nominal Affix Combinations in Old English: Distribution and Restrictions”, RESLA Revista Española de Linguística Aplicada, 24: 257-279.
  • Torre Alonso, R. (2012). “Recursive suffixation in the formation of Old English nouns”, in J. Martín, R. Torre Alonso, A. Canga Alonso and I. Medina Barco (eds.), Convergent Approaches on Mediaeval English Language and Literature. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars. pp. 63-86.
  • Trips, C. (2009). Lexical Semantics and Diachronic Morphology. The development of -hood, -dom and -ship in the History of English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783484971318
  • Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578
  • Van Valin, R. and LaPolla, R. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799
  • Wierzbicka, A. (2002). “Semantic Primes and Linguistic Typology”, in C. Goddard and A. Wierzbicka (eds.), Meaning and Universal Grammar. Theory and Empirical Findings (Volume II). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 257- 300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.61.10wie