Metaphoric complexesa Spanish-English contrastive analysis of metaphor and metonymy in interaction

Referencias bibliográficas

• Barcelona, A. 2003. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Barcelona, A. 2005. “The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains”. Cognitive Linguistics. Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, Eds. F. Ruiz de Mendoza and S. Peña Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 313-352.
• Caballero, R. 2003. “Talking about space: Image metaphor in architectural discourse”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1: 87-105. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Dirven, R. and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez. fc. “Looking back at 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics”. Cognitive Linguistics in Action: from Theory to Application and Back. Eds. E. Tabakowska, M. Choinski and L. Wiraszka. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter; in press.
• Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. 1996. “Blending as a central process in grammar”. Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Ed. A. Goldberg. Stanford, Cal.: Cambridge University Press. 113-130.
• Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. 1998. “Conceptual integration networks”. Cognitive Science 22 (2): 133-187.
• Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
• Gibbs, R. 1994. The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gibbs, R. and G. Steen. 1999. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Goossens, L. 1990. “Metaphtonymy: the Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action”. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Eds. R. Dirven and R. Pörings. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 349-378.
• Herrero Ruiz, J. 2009. Understanding Tropes: At the Crossroads between Pragmatics and Cognition. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
• Kövecses, Z. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kövecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kövecses, Z. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, G. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”. Metaphor and Thought, 2nded. Ed. A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 202-51.
• Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson .1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
• Lakoff, G. and M. Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lyons, J. 1982. “Deixis and Subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum?”. Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics. Eds. R. J. Jarvella and W. Klein. New York: Wiley. 101-124.
• Peña Cervel, S. 2003. Topology and Cognition: What Image-Schemas Reveal about the Metaphorical Language of Emotions. LINCOM Studies in Cognitive Linguistics. München: Lincolm.
• Peña Cervel, S. 2003. “Dependency systems for image schematic patterns in a usagebased approach to language. Journal of Pragmatics 40(6): 1041-1066.
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 2008. “Cross-linguistic analysis, second language teaching and cognitive semantics: The case of Spanish diminutives and reflexive constructions” Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar. Eds. S. De Knop and T. De Rycker. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 118-149.
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. and J. L. Otal Campo. 2002. Metonymy, Grammar and Communication. Albolote, Granada: Comares.
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. and O. Díez. 2002. “Patterns of Conceptual Interaction”. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Eds. R. Dirven and R. Pörings. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 489-532.
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. and Mairal, R. 2007. “High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction”. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Lexicon and Grammar. Eds. Radden, G, K. M. Köpcke, T. Berg, and P. Siemund. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 33-49.
• Scheibman, J. 2002. Point of View and Grammar. Structural Patterns of Subjectivity in American English Conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Stein, D. and S. Wright (eds.) 1995. Subjectivity and Subjectivization: Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Traugott, E. C. 1995. “Subjectification in grammaticalisation”. Subjectivity and Subjectivization: Linguistic Perspectives. Eds. D. Stein and S. Wright. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 31-54.
• Traugott, E.C. and R. B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Urios-Aparisi, E. 2009. “Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case Studies”. Multimodal Metaphor. Eds. C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 95-118.