Affix combination in Old English noun formation: Distribution and constraints

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aronoff, M. and N. Fuhrhop. 2002. “Restricting suffix combination in German and English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451-490.
• Bauer, L. 2007. The Linguistics Student’s Handbook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Bosworth, J. and T. N. Toller. 1973 (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Brinton, L. and E. Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Clark Hall, J. R. 1996 (1896). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• De la Cruz, J. 1975. “Old English Pure Prefixes: Structure and Function”. Linguistics 145: 47-81.
• Fabb, N. 1988. “English Suffixation is Constrained only by Selectional Restrictions”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 527-539.
• González Torres, E. 2009. Affixal Nouns in Old English: Morphological Description, Multiple Bases and Recursivity. PhD Dissertation. University of La Rioja.
• González Torres. E. 2010. “The inflection-derivation continuum and the Old English suffixes -a, -e, -o, -u”. Atlantis 32 (1): 103-122.
• González Torres, E. 2011. “The bases of derivation of Old English affixed nouns: Status and category”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia. Forthcoming.
• Hiltunen, R. 1983. The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb. Turku: Tutun Yliopisto.
• Horgan, D. 1980. “Patterns of variation and interchangability in some Old English Prefixes”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 91: 127-130.
• Lieber, R. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lindemann, J. W. R. 1953. “Old English preverbal Ge-: A re-examination of some current do”. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 64: 65-83.
• Lindemann, J. W. R. 1970. Old English preverbal Ge-: Its meaning. Charlottesville, Virginia: Virginia University Press.
• Von Lindheim, B. 1958. “Die Weiblichen Genussufixe”. Anglia: Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 76: 479-504.
• Kastovsky, D. 1971. “The Old English suffix -ER(E)”. Anglia LXXXIX 3: 285-325.
• Kastovsky, D. 1992. “Semantics and vocabulary”. The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066. Ed. R. Hogg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 290-408.
• Lieber, R. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mairal Usón, R. and F. Cortés Rodríguez. 2000-2001. “Semantic packaging and syntactic projections in word formation processes: The case of agent nominalizations”. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 14: 271-294.
• Martín Arista, J. 2005. “Geand the descriptive power of Nerthus”. Journal of English Studies 5-6: 209-231.
• Martín Arista, J. 2008. “Unification and separation in a Functional Theory of morphology”. Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Ed. R. Van Valin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 119-145.
• Martín Arista, J. 2009. “A typology of morphological constructions”. Deconstructing Constructions. Eds., C. Butler and J. Martín Arista. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 85-115.
• Martín Arista, J., L. Caballero González, E. González Torres, A. Ibáñez Moreno, R. Torre Alonso. 2009. Nerthus: An Online Lexical Database of Old English. http:// www.nerthusproject.com
• Martín Arista, J. 2010a. “OE strong verbs derived from strong verbs”. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7 (1): 36-56.
• Martín Arista, J. 2010b. “Lexical negation in Old English”. NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution. 60/61: 89-108.
• Martín Arista, J. 2010c. “Building a lexical database of Old English: Issues and landmarks”. Current Projects in Historical Lexicography. Ed. J. Considine. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 1-33.
• Martín Arista, J. 2011a. “Morphological relatedness and zero alternation in Old English”. Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. Eds. C. Butler and P. Guerrero Medina. London: Equinox. Forthcoming.
• Martín Arista, J. 2011b. “Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English”. English Studies 92 (3): 323-344.
• Martín Arista, J. 2011c. “Projections and constructions in Functional morphology: The case of Old English HRĒOW”. Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 393-424.
• Martín Arista, J. “Old English lexical primes: Corpus analysis and database compilation”. Creation and Use of Historical Linguistic Corpora in Spain. Ed. N. Vázquez. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars. Forthcoming-a.
• Martín Arista, J. Parasynthesis in Old English Word-Formation. Forthcoming-b.
• Martín Arista, J. The Old English prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal. Forthcoming-c.
• Martín Arista, J. Derivational Paradigms as Evidence for Semantic Primes: The Case of Old English. Forthcoming-d.
• Mitchell, B. 1978. “Prepositions, adverbs, prepositional adverbs, postpositions, separable prefixes or inseparable prefixes in Old English”. Neuphilologisce Mitteilungen 79: 240-257.
• Plag, I. 1999. Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Pounder, A. 2000. Processes and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Quirk R. and C. L. Wrenn. 1994 (1955). An Old English Grammar. DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press.
• Roberts, J. 1980. “Old English UN‘very’ and UNFERTH”. English Studies 61: 289-292.
• Samuels, M. L. 1949. The GePrefix in the Old English Gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospel. Translations of Philological Society.
• Schabram, H. 1970. “Bemerkungen zu den Altenglischen Nomina Agentis auf -ESTRE und -ICGE”. Angliā Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 88: 94-98.
• Stanley, E. 1982. “The prenominal prefix Gein late Old English and early Middle English”. Transactions from the Philological Society 80 (1): 25-66.
• Sweet, H. 1976 (1896). The Student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Torre Alonso, R., L. Caballero González, E. González Torres, A. Ibáñez Moreno and J. Martín Arista. 2008. “Fundamentos empíricos y metodológicos de una base de datos léxica de la morfología derivativa del Inglés Antiguo”. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 3: 129-144.