The subjective and objective functions in Old English deverbal formations

  1. Lacalle Palacios, Miguel 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 1885-9089

Año de publicación: 2010

Número: 9

Páginas: 201-215

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor lock_openAcceso abierto Postprint lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

The aim of this paper is to analyze Old English deverbal nouns derived by means of the sufffixes -a, -bora, -e, -en, -end, -ere/-re, -icge, -estre/-istre/-ystre, -o, and -u. The analysis is based on the derivational functions and the types of lexical derivation and category functions proposed by Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. After the analysis of 480 complex nouns, several conclusions are reached regarding the subjective vs. objective profile of derivatives. In this respect, the subjective function is more widespread than the objective one. It also turns out that most suffixes perform both derivational functions. Moreover, by finding a clausal correlate for complex nouns displaying these affixes, two types of derivational relationship have been found. Firstly, the explicit derivational relationship as in bacan 'to bake' ~ bæcestre 'baker', in which a full derivational morpheme turns up in the derivative, and, secondly, the implicit derivational relationship, such as the one holding in ri:dan 'to ride' ~ ridda 'rider', in which no derivational morpheme is present from a strictly synchronic point of view.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Beard, R. 1995. Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Beard, R. 1998. Derivation. In A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. 44-65. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Beard, R. and M. Volpe. 2005. Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. In P. Stekauer and R. Lieber (eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation. 189-205.
  • Dordrecht: Springer. de la Cruz Cabanillas, I. 2007. Semantic primes in Old English: a preliminary study of descriptors. SELIM 14: 37-58.
  • González Torres, E. 2010. The Continuum Inflection-Derivation and the Old English suffixes -a, -e, -o, -u. ATLANTIS 32: 103-122.
  • Guarddon Anelo, M. C. 2009a. Un análisis de las propiedades combinatorias de los primitivos semánticos a través de las adposiciones complejas en inglés antiguo. Revista Española de Lingüística. Forthcoming.
  • Guarddon Anelo, M. C. 2009b. The Natural Semantic Metalanguage of Old English Compound Adpositions. English Studies 30: 61-83.
  • Healey, A. di Paolo. 2003. The Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form A-F. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.  
  • Kastovsky, D. 1968. Old English Deverbal Substantives Derived by means of a Zero Morpheme. PhD Dissertation. Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-Universität.
  • Kastovsky, D. 1986. Deverbal nouns in Old and Modern English: from stem-formation to word-formation. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Semantics-Historical Word Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 221-261.
  • Kastovsky, D. 1989. Typological Changes in the History of English Morphology. In U. Fries and M. Heusser (eds.), Meaning and Beyond. Ernst Leisi zum 70. Geburstag. Tübingen. 281-293.
  • Kastovsky, D. 1990. The typological status of Old English Word Formation. In S. Adamson, V. Law, N. Vincent and S. Wright (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. 205-224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kastovsky, D. 1992. Semantics and vocabulary. In R. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 290-408.
  • Kastovsky, D. 2005. Conversion and/on zero: word-formation theory, historical linguistics, and typology. In L. Bauer and S. Varela (eds.), Approaches to Conversion/Zero Derivation Münster: Waxmann. 31-50.
  • Kastovsky, D. 2006. Typological Changes in Derivational Morphology. In A. van Kemenade and B. Los (eds.), The Handbook of The History of English. Oxford: Blackwell. 151- 177.
  • Marchand, H. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. München: C.H. Beck´sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2008. Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology. In R. Van Valin (ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 119-145.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2009. A Typology of Morphological Constructions. In C. Butler and J. Martín Arista (eds.), Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 85- 115.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2010a. OE strong verbs derived from strong verbs. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7: 36-56.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2010b. Lexical negation in Old English. NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution 60/61: 89-108.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2010c. Building a lexical database of Old English: issues and landmarks. In J. Considine (ed.), Current projects in historical lexicography. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 1-39.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2011a. Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English. English Studies. In press.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2011b. Projections and constructions in functional morphology: the case of HREOW. Language and Linguistics. In press.
  • Martín Arista, J. 2011c. Morphological relatedness and zero alternation in Old English. In P. Guerrero Medina (eds.), Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. London: Equinox. In Press.
  • Martín Arista, J. Parasynthesis in Old English word-formation. Forthcoming-a. Martín Arista, J. Morfología flexiva en RRG. In R. Mairal, L. Guerrero and C. González (eds.), El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística. Madrid: Akal Universitaria. Forthcoming-b.
  • Martín Arista, J. Old English Lexical Primes: Corpus Analysis and Database Compilation. In N. Vázquez (ed.), Creation and Use of Historical Linguistic Corpora in Spain. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars. Forthcoming-c.
  • Martín Arista, J. and M.V. Martín de la Rosa. 2006. Old English Semantic Primes: Substantives, Determiners and Quantifiers. Atlantis 28.2: 9-28.
  • Mitchell, B. 1992. A Guide to Old English. Oxford: Blackwell. Quirk, R. and C. L. Wrenn. 1994 (1955). An Old English Grammar. DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet