Teaching English to Mixed-Ability Secondary Students through e-tandem

  1. Canga Alonso, Andrés
Revista:
Odisea: Revista de estudios ingleses

ISSN: 1578-3820

Año de publicación: 2006

Número: 7

Páginas: 33-44

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Odisea: Revista de estudios ingleses

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BENSON, P. 1996. “Concepts of autonomy in language learning.” Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning. Ed. R. PEMBERTON, et al. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 27-34.
  • BENSON, P. 1996. 1997. “The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy.” Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. Eds. P. BENSON & P. VOLLER. London: Longman. 18-36.
  • BENSON, P. 1996. 2000. “Autonomy as a learner’s and teacher’s right.” Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions. Eds. B. SINCLAIR, I. MCGRATH & T. LAMB. Harlow: Longman. 111-117.
  • BENSON, P. & S. TOOGOOD, eds. 2002. Challenges to Research and Practice. Dublin: Authentik.
  • BRAMMERTS, H. 2003. “Autonomous language learning in tandem: The development of a concept.” Autonomous Language Learning in Tandem. Eds. L. LEWIS & L. WALKER. Sheffield: Academic Electronic Publications. 27-36.
  • BRAMMERTS, H. & M. CALVERT. 2003. “Learning by communicating in tandem.” Eds. L. LEWIS & L. WALKER. Sheffield: Academic Electronic Publications. 45-60.
  • BYRAM, M. 1997. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • FREIRE, P. 1974. Education for Critical Consciousness. London: Sheed and Ward.
  • GLÄSMANN, S. & M. CALVERT. 2001. Tandem Language Learning in Schools. Sheffield: Philip Armstrong Publications.
  • HOLEC, H. 1981. Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • LITTLE, D. 1991. Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
  • LITTLE, D. 1996. “Freedom to learn and compulsion to Interact: Promoting learner autonomy through the use of information technologies.” Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning. Ed. R. PEMBERTON, et al. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 203-218.
  • LITTLE, D. 1997. “Responding authentically to authentic texts: A problem for selfaccess language learning?” Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. Eds. P. BENSON & P. VOLLER. London: Longman. 225-248.
  • LITTLE, D. 2000. “Learner autonomy and human independence: Some theoretical and practical consequences of a social-interactive view of cognition, learning and language.” Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions. Eds. B. SINCLAIR, I. MCGRATH & T. LAMB. Harlow: Longman. 15-23.
  • LITTLE, D. 2003. “Tandem language learning and learner autonomy”. Autonomous Language Learning in Tandem. Eds. L. LEWIS & L. WALKER. Sheffield: Academic Electronic Publications. 37-44.
  • NUNAN, D. 1999. Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • PENNYCOOK, A. 1997. “Cultural alternatives and autonomy.” Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. Eds. P. BENSON & P. VOLLER. London: Longman. 35-53.
  • Teaching English to Mixed-Ability Secondary Students...44 Andrés Canga Alonso
  • ROZA, Mª B, et al. 2001. Guía tándem. Metodología tándem para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de Lenguas en el ámbito escolar (Colección Materiales para el Aula). Gijón: Centro de Profesores y Recursos.
  • STICKLER, U. & T. LEWIS. 2003. “Tandem learning and intercultural competence.” Autonomous Language Learning in Tandem. Eds. L. LEWIS & L. WALKER. Sheffield: Academic Electronic Publications. 93-104.
  • VOLLER, P. 1997. “Does the teacher have a role in autonomous language learning?” Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. Eds. P. BENSON & P. VOLLER. London: Longman. 98-113.
  • VIGOTSKY, L. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.