Using Lex30 to measure the L2 productive vocabulary of Spanish primary learners of EFL

  1. Jiménez Catalán, Rosa María 1
  2. Moreno Espinosa, Soraya 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
VIAL, Vigo international journal of applied linguistics

ISSN: 1697-0381

Año de publicación: 2005

Número: 2

Páginas: 27-44

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: VIAL, Vigo international journal of applied linguistics

Resumen

Lex30 is an experimental test of L2 productive vocabulary (Meara and Fitzpatrick,2000), that elicits a rich vocabulary output from a free word association task. Since its development, it has been mainly used to measure the productive vocabulary of undergraduate learners of EFL. In this paper, we will present the results of a study that has been carried out with a homogeneous group of 282 Spanish primary school learners of EFL enrolled in the fourth grade. The purpose of this study is to ascertain whether the L2 productive vocabulary of such young learners can be measured by means of this exploratory tool.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baba, K. 2002. “Test Review: Lex30”. Language Testing Update 32: 68-71.
  • Bauer, L. and Nation, I. S. P. 1993. “Word families”. International Journal of Lexicography 6: 253-279.
  • Farhady, H. 1982. “Measures of Language Proficiency from the Learners’ perspective”. TESOL Quarterly 16 (1): 43-59.
  • Fitzpatrick, T. 2000. “Using Word Association Techniques to Measure Productive Vocabulary in a Second Language”. Language Testing Update 32: 68-71.
  • Fitzpatrick, T. and Meara, P. 2004. “Exploring the validity of a test of productive vocabulary”. VIAL 1: 55-73.
  • Fitzpatrick, T. 2004. “Measuring Short-term Changes in the Lexicon of L2 Learners”. Poster presented at the 14 EUROSLA Conference. University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián.
  • Ishikawa, S., Uemura T., Kaneda, M., Shmizu, S., Sugimori, N. Tono, Y. Mochizuki, M and Murata, M. 2003. JACET 8000: JACET List of 8000 Basic Words. Tokyo: JACET.
  • Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F and Hughey, J. B. 1981. English Composition Program. Rowley Mass: Newbury House Publishers Inc.
  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. and Moreno Espinosa, S. 2004. “L2 Word Associations and the Variable Sex: An Outline According to an Electronic Tool”. In Celada, A. R., Pastor García, D. and Pardo García, P. J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 27th International AEDEAN Conference. Salamanca: Editorial Ambos Mundos (CD-ROM format).
  • Laufer, B. and Nation, P. 1995. “Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production”. Applied Linguistics 16 (3): 255-271.
  • Laufer, B. and Nation, P. 1999. “A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability”. Language Testing 16 (1): 33-51.
  • Meara, P. and Fitzpatrick, T. 2000. “Lex30: an improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2”. System 28: 19-30.
  • Meara, P. and Fitzpatrick, T. 2004. Lex30 v 2.01, The Manual. Swansea: Lognostics. Available from http://www.swan.ac.uk/cals/calsres.html
  • Meara, P. and Jones, G. 1987. “Tests of Vocabulary size in English as a foreign language”. Polyglot 8 (1): 1-40.
  • Moreno Espinosa, S. 2004. “Can the Productive Version of the Vocabulary Levels Test Be Satisfactorily Used to Assess Spanish Second Language Learners?”. In Moskowich-Spiegel Fandiño, I. and Crespo García, B. (Eds.). Reinterpretations of English (II). Essays on Literature, Culture and Film. A Coruña: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad da Coruña.
  • Nation, I. S. P. 1984. Vocabulary Lists. Wellington: Victory University of Wellington, English Language Institute.
  • Nation, I. S. P. 1990a. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
  • Nation, I. S. P. 1990b. “Measuring Readiness for Simplified Material: A Test of the First 1,000 Words of English”. In Tickoo, M. L. (Ed.) Simplification: Theory and Application. RELC Anthology Series 31.
  • Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. and Clapham, C. 2001. “Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test”. Language Testing 18 (1): 55-88.