Grounding politeness

Referencias bibliográficas

• Bergen, B. K. 1996. Breakdown of Society. A Conceptual Metaphor Approach to Social Theory and the Concept of Society. PhD Dissertation. Unpublished Draft. University of California at Berkeley.
• Blum-Kulka, S. 1992. “The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society”. Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Eds. R.J. Watts, S. Ide, and K. Ehlich. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1987 (1978). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Clark, H. and D. Schunk. 1980. “Polite responses to polite requests.” Cognition 8: 111- 143.
• Fraser, B. and W. Nolen. 1981. “The association of deference with linguistic form”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 93-109.
• Gentner, D. and D. Gentner. 1983. “Flowing waters and teeming crowds”. Mental Models. Eds. D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens. Hillsdale. N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.
• Gentner, D. and A.L. Stevens, eds. 1983. Mental Models. Hillsdale. N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.
• Gu, Y. 1990. “Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 237-258.
• Haverkate, H. 1994. La cortesía verbal. Estudio pragmalingüístico. Madrid: Gredos. Held, G. 1992. “Politeness in linguistic research”. Politeness in Language. Studies in its
• History, Theory and Practice. Eds. R.J. Watts, S. Ide, and K. Ehlich. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A. and T. Ogino. 1986. “Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English”. Journal of Pragmatics 10: 347-371.
• Holmes, J. 1995. Women, Men, and Politeness. London and New York: Longman.
• Ide, S. 1989. “Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness”. Multilingua 8: 223-248.
• Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Kasper, G. 1990. “Linguistic politeness: current research issues”. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 193-218.
• Kövecses, Z. 1996. The Force of Emotion. Why Metaphor Matters. Unpublished Book Manuscript.
• Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, G. 1993. “The contemporary theory of metaphor”. Metaphor and Thought . Ed. A. Ortony. Cambridge: CUP.
• Lakoff, G. 1996. “Sorry, I’m not myself today: the metaphor system for conceptualizing the self.” Spaces, Worlds and Grammars. Eds. G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
• Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
• Mao, L. R. 1994. “Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed”. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 451-486.
• Matsumoto, Y.1989. “Politeness and conversational universals: Observations from Japanese”. Multilingua 8: 207-221.
• Nwoye, O. G. 1992. “Linguistic politeness and sociocultural variation of the notion of face”. Journal of Pragmatics 18(4): 309-328.
• O’Driscoll, J. 1996. “About face: a defence and elaboration of universal dualism”. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 1-32.
• Pandharipande, R. 1992. “Defining politeness in Indian English”. World Englishes 11 (2/3): 241-250.
• Pavlidou, T. 1994. “Contrasting German-Greek politeness and the consequences”. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 487-511.
• Peña Cervel, S. 1997. “The role of the event structure metaphor and of image-schematic structure in metaphors for happiness and sadness”. Miscelanea. Journal of English and American Studies 18: 253-266. Universidad de Zaragoza.
• Sell, R.D. 1991. “The politeness of literary texts”. Literary Pragmatics. Ed. R. Sell. London: Routledge. 208-224.
• Tannen, D. 1993. “The relativity of linguistic strategies: rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance”. Gender and Conversational Interaction. Ed. D.Tannen. New York: Oxford U.P.
• Travis, C. 1998. “Omoiyari as a core Japanese value: Japanese-style empathy?”. Speaking of Emotions. Conceptualization and Expression. Eds. A. Athanasiadou and E. Tabakowska. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Watts, R. J. 1992. “Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality.” Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Eds. R.J. Watts, S. Ide, and K. Ehlich. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Wierzbicka, A. 1985. “Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English”. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145-178.
• Wierzbicka, A. 1997. Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words. Oxford: OUP.