How Attractive Are Sexist Intimates to Adolescents? The Influence of Sexist Beliefs and Relationship Experience

  1. Montañés, P. 1
  2. de Lemus, S. 2
  3. Moya, M. 2
  4. Bohner, G. 3
  5. Megías, J.L. 2
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  3. 3 Bielefeld University
    info

    Bielefeld University

    Bielefeld, Alemania

    ROR https://ror.org/02hpadn98

Revista:
Psychology of Women Quarterly

ISSN: 0361-6843

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 37

Número: 4

Páginas: 494-506

Tipo: Artículo

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.1177/0361684313475998 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-84887590203 WoS: WOS:000329761500009 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psychology of Women Quarterly

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The emergence of heterosexual intimate relationship experiences has been described as central to the development of ambivalent sexist attitudes during adolescence. The quality of these relationships might be largely determined by the perceived attractiveness and expectancies about potential partners also in ideological terms. In a questionnaire study, 262 Spanish adolescents reported their attraction toward various sexist (hostile, benevolent, and ambivalent) and non-sexist profiles of other-sex targets as potential friends and intimate partners. Relationships between attraction judgments and participants' own sexist beliefs as well as their experiences in romantic relationships were examined. Results show that young women considered benevolent sexist young men to be most attractive and young men considered ambivalent sexist young women to be most attractive. Congruency effects were found between these preferences and participants' own sexist attitudes. In addition, young women's experiences in romantic relationships significantly predicted their preference for benevolent sexist young men. Discussion focuses on the importance of socialization in the development of such preferences and on the endorsement of benevolent sexism in female and male adolescents. More generally, theoretical and applied implications of these results in relation to ambivalent sexism theory are discussed. © The Author(s) 2013.