Fibre selection based on an overall analytical feature comparison for the solid phase microextraction of thihalomethanes from drinking water

  1. San Juan, P.M. 1
  2. Carrillo, J.D. 1
  3. Tena, M.T. 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Journal of Chromatography A

ISSN: 0021-9673

Año de publicación: 2007

Volumen: 1139

Número: 1

Páginas: 27-35

Tipo: Artículo

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.1016/J.CHROMA.2006.10.084 PMID: 17109874 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-33845587252 WoS: WOS:000244060900004 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Chromatography A

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This paper describes the optimization of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) conditions for three different fibres (Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CAR-PDMS), divinylbenzene-Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (DVB-CAR-PDMS) and polydimethylsiloxane-divinylbenzene (PDMS-DVB)) used to determine trihalomethanes (THMs) in water by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography (HS-SPME-GC). The influence of temperature and salting-out effect was examined using a central composite design for each fibre. Extraction time was studied separately at the optimum values found for temperature and sodium chloride concentration (40 °C and 0.36 g mL-1). The HS-SPME-GC-MS method for each fibre was characterised in terms of linearity, detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) limits and repeatability. The fibre PDMS-DVB was selected as it provided a broader linear range, better repeatability and lower detection and quantification limits than the others, particularly CAR-PDMS fibre. The accuracy of the proposed method using the PDMS-DVB fibre was checked by a recovery study in both ultrapure and tap water. A blank analysis study showed the absence of memory effects for this fibre. The reproducibility (expressed as a percentage of relative standard deviation) was 6-11% and the detection limits were between 0.078 and 0.52 μg L-1 for bromoform and chloroform, respectively. Finally, the method was applied to determine THM concentration in two drinking water samples. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.