Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment software tools through a wind turbine case study

  1. Martínez, E. 1
  2. Blanco, J. 1
  3. Jiménez, E. 1
  4. Saenz-Díez, J.C. 1
  5. Sanz, F. 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Aldizkaria:
Renewable Energy

ISSN: 0960-1481

Argitalpen urtea: 2015

Alea: 74 (2015)

Orrialdeak: 237-246

Mota: Artikulua

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2014.08.004 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-84906517420 WoS: WOS:000345947700026 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Renewable Energy

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

This paper seeks to analyse the differences between environmental impact assessment software tools by examining the results that they give when applied to a multi-megawatt wind turbine.Seven different life cycle impact assessment software tools are compared: CML 2001, Eco-indicator 99, Ecopoints 97, EDIP, EPS 2000, IMPACT2002 and TRACI.In Acidification and Eutrophication two groups are found: one includes the results provided by CML, Ecopoints 97, EDIP, EPS and TRACI and the other those of Eco-indicator 99 and Impact2002. In Abiotic Depletion all the results are similar except those of the EPS method, which gives negative figures. Likewise in Ozone Layer Depletion the results provided by Ecopoints 97 differ from the rest. In Human Toxicity and Ecotoxicity markedly different results are obtained by each of the LCIAs studied.In some categories major differences are found between the results provided by the 7 LCIAs examined. Which of the impact assessment software tools currently available in LCA software is chosen is therefore a critical issue. The results provided by the different software tools are not always similar, and this needs to be realised and taken into account when using the resulting data in decision-making processes.