CLIL or time? Lexical profiles of CLIL and non-CLIL EFL learners

  1. Jiménez Catalán, R.M. 1
  2. Agustín Llach, M.P. 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
System

ISSN: 0346-251X

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 66

Páginas: 87-99

Tipo: Artículo

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2017.03.016 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85016055983 WoS: WOS:000401138500007 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: System

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Recently, there has been considerable research concerning the effect of CLIL on English language learners’ competence. However, it remains unclear if the positive effects found are due to CLIL or to time. To clarify this issue, this paper focuses on the vocabulary output of CLIL and non-CLIL EFL learners after an equal number of hours of English exposure. The objectives were twofold: (1) to ascertain whether the CLIL group retrieves a higher number of English words than the non-CLIL group; (2) to determine whether the two groups produce the same or different words. The sample comprised 70 Spanish EFL learners in their 8th and 10th year of secondary education. The data collection instrument was a lexical availability task consisting of ten prompts. The data were edited, coded, and subjected to quantitative and qualitative analyses. The results showed that the CLIL group retrieved a higher number of words than the non-CLIL group. However, both groups exhibited similarities concerning most and least productive prompts, first word responses, word frequency, and word level. The findings suggest a need to conduct equal comparisons of CLILs and non-CLIL groups as well as to examine the task effect, and the vocabulary input received by learners. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd