Effects of Organizational Macroergonomic Compatibility Elements over Manufacturing Systems’ Performance

  1. Realyvásquez, A. 1
  2. Maldonado-Macías, A.A. 1
  3. García-Alcaraz, J.L. 12
  4. Blanco-Fernández, J. 2
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

    Ciudad Juárez, México

    ROR https://ror.org/05fj8cf83

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Procedia Manufacturing

ISSN: 2351-9789

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 3

Páginas: 5715-5722

Tipo: Artículo

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.1016/J.PROMFG.2015.07.807 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85009999490 WoS: WOS:000383740305114 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Procedia Manufacturing

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This paper examines the effects of organizational macroergonomic compatibility elements over manufacturing systems performance from four companies located in the city of Ciudad Juarez, México. Current studies scarcely address the relationship that exists among the factors and their elements included in the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) macroergonomic model and the benefits they may generate on manufacturing systems’ performance. The SEIPS model includes macroergonomic factors such as person, organization, technology and tools, tasks, and environment, and it has been adapted for manufacturing systems. This paper is focused on the analysis of the relationship among the macroergonomic organizational elements (elements of the factor organization) included in the SEIPS model, and the benefits that these elements may generate on manufacturing systems performance using a structural equation modelling approach. Results indicate that macroergonomic organizational elements like organizational culture and organizational communication have a direct effect over clients and an indirect effect over the manufacturing processes and the growth of the companies. These results can offer some relevant and new knowledge to develop macroergonomic strategies for manufacturing systems in order to increase their competitiveness. Additionally, knowledge about direct and indirect effects derived from organizational elements over manufacturing systems greatly supports the design and improvement of these systems. © 2015 The Authors