Variability and parasitoid foraging efficiency: A case study of pea aphids and Aphidius ervi

  1. Ives, A.R. 2
  2. Schooler, S.S. 2
  3. Jagar, V.J. 2
  4. Knuteson, S.E. 2
  5. Grbic, M. 1
  6. Settle, W.H. 3
  1. 1 University of Western Ontario
    info

    University of Western Ontario

    London, Canadá

    ROR https://ror.org/02grkyz14

  2. 2 University of Wisconsin–Madison
    info

    University of Wisconsin–Madison

    Madison, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/01y2jtd41

  3. 3 Food and Agriculture Organization, Programme for Comm. Integrated Pest, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
Revista:
American Naturalist

ISSN: 0003-0147

Año de publicación: 1999

Volumen: 154

Número: 6

Páginas: 652-673

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1086/303269 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-0033383974 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: American Naturalist

Resumen

When a parasitoid is searching for hosts, not all hosts are equally likely to be attacked. This variability in attack probability may affect the parasitoid functional response. Using a collection of experiments, we quantified the functional response of Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an insect parasitoid of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae). We measured variability in the number of hosts attacked by a foraging parasitoid both among plants and within plants. At the first scale, A. ervi, searching among plants containing different numbers of aphids, showed both aphid-density-dependent and aphid-density-independent variability in the number of aphids attacked per plant. Within plants, A. ervi selectively attacked second and third instar aphids relative to other instars. Furthermore, there was variability in the susceptibility of attack among aphids independent of instar. Variability in attack rates among aphids both among and within plants decreased parasitoid foraging efficiency, with the greatest decrease caused by among-plant variability. Furthermore, the decrease in foraging efficiency was greatest when the average number of aphids per plant was low, thereby transforming a strong Type II functional response into one approaching Type 1.