The Value of Medicines: A Crucial but Vague Concept

  1. Antoñanzas, F. 2
  2. Terkola, R. 14
  3. Postma, M. 334
  1. 1 University of Florida
    info

    University of Florida

    Gainesville, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/02y3ad647

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

  3. 3 University Medical Center Groningen
    info

    University Medical Center Groningen

    Groninga, Holanda

    ROR https://ror.org/03cv38k47

  4. 4 University of Groningen
    info

    University of Groningen

    Groninga, Holanda

    ROR https://ror.org/012p63287

Revista:
PharmacoEconomics

ISSN: 1170-7690

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 34

Número: 12

Páginas: 1-13

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1007/S40273-016-0434-8 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-84979248824 WoS: WOS:000388142700003 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: PharmacoEconomics

Resumen

Health Technology Assessment is increasingly used to evaluate the value of healthcare products and to prioritize resources; however, defining exactly what value is and how it should be measured remains a challenge. In this article, we report the results of a literature review, focusing on nine European countries, with the aim of investigating how value is defined from the perspective of different stakeholders, how definitions of value are used, and how value is incorporated into decision making. Only three articles were identified that presented definitions of value, and there was no single shared definition of value in healthcare, which appears to be a highly subjective concept. The majority of the countries investigated combine clinical assessment with economic evaluation to make reimbursement recommendations; the quality-adjusted life-year is the most commonly used measure of value but does not capture broader aspects of value that may be important to patients and healthcare systems. We describe the use of value-based pricing and multi-criteria decision analysis, two approaches to the incorporation of broader aspects of value into decision making. Overall, we have identified considerable variation in how a product’s value is defined by different stakeholders. Although a universal understanding of value in healthcare is important, it is clear that current definitions are insufficient, potentially leading to inconsistent reimbursement decisions. Ultimately, the establishment of clearer policies for defining and measuring value in healthcare is needed, and is likely to lead to improvements in the consistency of decision making. © 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland