The inflection-derivation continuum and the Old English suffixes -a, -e, -o, -u

  1. Elisa González Torres 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja, España
Journal:
Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos

ISSN: 0210-6124

Year of publication: 2010

Volume: 32

Issue: 1

Pages: 103-122

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos

Institutional repository: lock_openOpen access Editor

Abstract

This article addresses the question of the continuity between inflection and derivation as posed by the Old English suffixes -a, -e, -o and -u. On the structural side, the morphological analysis that has been carried out focuses on the overlapping of inflectional and derivational phenomena. On the functional side, affixation is analysed in the constituent projection and inflection in the operator projection of the Layered Structure of the Word (LSW), where the derivational affix constitutes a morphological pivot and the inflectional affix a morphological controller. The conclusion is reached that, whereas the LSW allows for a unified treatment of derivation and inflection in the synchronic axis, it requieres further attention in the area of inflection as a Word/Complex Word operator. In this line, this article demonstrates that the insertion of gender, number and case operators in the top layer stresses the morphological character of the LSW, while it is more consistent with the grammatical nature of gender in Old English.

Bibliographic References

  • Allen, Cynthia 2005: ‘Case Syncretism and Word Order Change’. Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los, eds. The Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Blackwell. 201-23.
  • Bauer, Laurie 2004: ‘The Borderline between Derivation and Compounding’. Wolfgang Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar Pfeiffer and Franz Rainer, eds. Morphology and its Demarcations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 97-108.
  • Beard, Robert 1995: Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. Albany: State U of New York P.
  • Beard, Robert and Mark Volpe 2005: ‘Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology’. Pavol Stekauer and Rochelle Lieber, eds. Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer. 189-205.
  • Bybee, Joan 1985: Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Caballero González, Laura, Elisa González Torres, Ana Ibáñez Moreno and Javier Martín Arista 2004-2005: ‘Predicados verbales primitivos y derivados en inglés antiguo. Implicaciones para la elaboración de una base de datos léxica’. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 17-18: 35-49.
  • Campbell, Alistair 1987 (1959): Old English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Curzan, Anne 2003: Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • de la Cruz, Juan 1975: ‘Old English Pure Prefixes: Structure and Function’. Linguistics 145: 47-81.
  • Dressler, Wolfgang 1989: ‘Prototypical Differences between Inflection and Derivation’. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3-10.
  • Giegerich, Heinz 1999: Lexical Strata in English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Hay, Jennifer 2002: ‘From Speech Perception to Morphology: Affix Ordering Revisited’. Language 78: 527-55.
  • Hay, Jennifer 2003: Causes and Consequences of Word Structure. New York: Routledge.
  • Hay, Jennifer and Ingo Plag 2004: ‘What Constraints Possible Suffix Combinations?’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 565-96.
  • Hiltunen, Risto 1983: The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb. Turku: Tutun Yliopisto.
  • Hogg, Richard, ed. 1992: The Cambridge History of the English Language I. The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Horgan, Dorothy 1980: ‘Patterns of Variation and Interchangability in some Old English Prefixes’. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 91: 127-30.
  • Kastovsky, Dieter 1968: Old English Deverbal Substantives Derived by means of a Zero Morpheme. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen.
  • Kastovsky, Dieter 1992: ‘Semantics and Vocabulary’. Richard Hogg, ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 290-408.
  • Kastovsky, Dieter 2005: ‘Hans Marchand and the Marchandeans’. Pavol Stekauer and Rochelle Lieber, eds. Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer. 99-124.
  • Manova, Stela 2005: ‘Derivation versus Inflection in three Inflecting Languages’. Wolfgang Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar Pfeiffer and Franz Rainer, eds. Morphology and its Demarcations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 233-52.
  • Marchand, Hans 1969: The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. München: C.H. Beck´sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
  • Martin Arista, Javier 2006a: ‘Alternations, Relatedness and Motivation: Old English A-’. Pilar Guerrero Medina and Estela Martínez Jurado, eds. Where Grammar Meets Discourse: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. Córdoba: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba. 113-32.
  • Martin Arista, Javier 2006b: ‘Old English Agentive Suffixes and the Asymmetry of Morphological Representations’. Paper presented at the 2006 Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society, held at the University of Queensland.
  • Martin Arista, Javier 2008a: ‘Unification and Separation in a Functional Theory of Morphology’. Robert Van Valin, ed. Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 119-45.
  • Martin Arista, Javier 2008b. ‘The ge-alternation and the descriptive power of Nerthus’. Journal of English Studies 5-6: 209-231.
  • Martin Arista, Javier 2009: ‘A Typology of Morphological Constructions’. Christopher Butler and Javier Martín Arista, eds. Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 85-115.
  • Martin Arista, Javier (forthcoming a): ‘Building a Lexical Database of Old English: Issues and Landmarks’ In J. Considine ed. Current projects in historical lexicography. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Martin Arista, Javier forthcoming b: ‘Morphological Relatedness and Zero Alternation in Old English’. eds. Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. In C. Butler and P. Guerrero eds. London: Equinox. (forthcoming-b).
  • Martin Arista, Javier forthcoming c: Parasynthesis in Old English Word-Formation
  • Martin Arista, Javier forthcoming d: OE strong verbs derived from strong verbs. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics (forthcoming-d)
  • Martín Arista, Javier and Victoria Martín de la Rosa: 2006. ‘Old English Semantic Primes: Substantives, Determiners and Quantifiers’. ATLANTIS 17: 9-28.
  • Pilch, Herbert 1970: Altenglische Grammatik. Dialektologie. Phonologie. Morphologie. Syntax. München: Max Hueber Verlag.
  • Shopen, Timothy 1985: Language Typology and Syntactic Description III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Stump, Gregory 1998: ‘Inflection’. Andrew Spencer and Arnold M. Zwicky, eds. The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell. 13-43.
  • Stump, Gregory 2005: ‘Word-formation and Inflectional Morphology’. Pavol Stekauer and Rochelle Lieber, eds. Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer. 49-71.
  • Torre Alonso, Roberto, Javier Martín Arista, Ana Ibáñez Moreno, Elisa González Torres and Laura Caballero González 2008: ‘Fundamentos empíricos y metodológicos de una base de datos léxica de la morfología derivativa del inglés antiguo’. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 3: 129-44.
  • Van Valin, Robert 2005: Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Van Valin, Robert and Randy LaPolla 1997: Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Data source: Dialnet