Desarrollo y validación de un cuestionario de compatibilidad macroergonómica

  1. Arturo Realyvásquez Vargas 1
  2. Jorge Luis García Alcaraz 1
  3. Julio Blanco Fernández 2
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, México
  2. 2 Universidad de la Rioja, España
Revista:
Contaduría y administración

ISSN: 0186-1042 2448-8410

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 61

Número: 3

Páginas: 478-498

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.CYA.2016.04.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Contaduría y administración

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

Este artículo presenta el desarrollo del Cuestionario de Compatibilidad Macroergonómica (CCM), el cual se enfoca en colectar datos sobre la aplicación de prácticas macroergonómicas respecto a los factores capital humano, organización, tareas, herramientas y tecnología, y condiciones ambientales en los sistemas de manufactura. El CCM comprende 3 secciones: datos demográficos, aplicación de prácticas macroergo-nómicas e importancia de estas. Las preguntas están formuladas con base en la revisión de literatura, y respondidas en escalas ordinales. La validación del CCM se realiza a través de un análisis factorial, y la opinión de los expertos. El CCM se aplicó a 188 empleados de sistemas de manufactura y 6 expertos en Ergonomía. De los empleados se obtuvo que solo 8 de las 23 variables analizadas tuvieron un valor de alfa de Cronbach < 0.7, sin embargo, de los expertos se obtuvo que 5 de estas 8 variables fueron las más importantes dentro de su grupo, por lo cual se conservaron dentro del cuestionario.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Åkerstedt, T., Fredlund, P., Gillberg, M. y Jansson, B. (2002). Work load and work hours in relation to disturbed sleep and fatigue in a large representative sample. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53(1), 585–588.
  • Anderson, D. J., Binder, M. y Krause, K. (2002). The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. Indus. & Lab. Rel. Rev., 56, 273.
  • Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E. y Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 265–285.
  • Balbinotti, G. y Paupitz, A. (2015). Internationally management of socio-technical projects–A case study in a vehicle assembly. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 6345–6352.
  • Beckers, D. G. J., van der Linden, D., Smulders, P. G. W., Kompier, M. A. J., van Veldhoven, M. J. P. M. y van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Working overtime hours: Relations with fatigue, work motivation, and the quality of work. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(12), 1282–1289.
  • Bolis, I. y Sznelwar, L. I. (2015). A case study of the implementation of an ergonomics improvement committee in a Brazilian hospital–Challenges and benefits. Applied ergonomics.
  • Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D. y Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire [unpublished manuscript]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • Carayon, P. y Hoonakker, P. L. T. (2004). Macroergonomic Organizational Questionnaire Survey (MOQS). En N. A. Stanton, A. Hedge, K. Brookhuis, E. Salas, y H. W. Hendrick (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomic methods. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 76-71.
  • Carayon, P., Hundt, A. S., Karsh, B. T., Gurses, A. P., Alvarado, C. J., Smith, M., et al. (2006). Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(Suppl 1), i50–i58.
  • Celik, M., Kahraman, C., Cebi, S. y Er, I. D. (2009). Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: The case of Turkish shipyards. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 599–615.
  • Choudhry, R. M., Fang, D. y Mohamed, S. (2007). The nature of safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Safety Science, 45(10), 993–1012.
  • Coluci, M. Z. O., Alexandre, N. M. C. y Rosecrance, J. (2009). Reliability and validity of an ergonomics-related Job Factors Questionnaire. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(6), 995–1001.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
  • Detert, J. R. y Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884.
  • Di Pietro, L., Pantano, E. y di Virgilio, F. (2014). Frontline employees’ attitudes towards self-service technologies: Threats or opportunity for job performance? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5), 844–850, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.02.014
  • Fornell, C. y Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39–50.
  • García, J. L., Maldonado, A. A., Alvarado, A. y Rivera, D. G. (2014). Human critical success factors for kaizen and its impacts in industrial performance. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70(9–12), 2187–2198.
  • García-Acosta, G. y Lange-Morales, K. (2008). Macroergonomic study of food sector company distribution centres. Applied Ergonomics, 39(4), 439–449, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.02.004
  • Giunta, A., Nifo, A. y Scalera, D. (2012). Subcontracting in Italian industry: Labour division, firm growth and the north–south divide. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1067–1083.
  • Glover, W. J., Farris, J. A., van Aken, E. M. y Doolen, T. L. (2011). Critical success factors for the sustainability of Kaizen event human resource outcomes: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 132(2), 197–213.
  • Golshan, N. y Tafazoli, D. (2014). Technology-enhanced language learning tools in Iranian EFL context: Frequencies, attitudes and challenges. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136(0), 114–118, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.299
  • Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E. y Black, W. C. (2006). . Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Häusser, J. A., Mojzisch, A., Niesel, M. y Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job demand–control (-support) model and psychological well-being. Work & Stress, 24(1), 1–35.
  • Hildebrandt, V. H., Bongers, P. M., van Dijk, F. J. H., Kemper, H. C. G. y Dul, J. (2001). Dutch Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: Description and basic qualities. Ergonomics, 44(12), 1038–1055.
  • Horst, D. J., Broday, E. E., Bondarik, R. y de Paula Xavier, A. A. (2015). Open or closed? Macroergonomics approaching socio-technical systems productivity: An overview of the conceptual framework. Social and Basic Sciences Research Review, 3(2), 98–115.
  • Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D. y Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332.
  • Instituto-Nacional-de-Estadística-Geografía-e-Informática-(INEGI). (2015). Estadística Integral de Programa de la Industria Manufacturera, Maquiladora y Servicios de Exportación (IMMEX).
  • Jung, M.-C. y Hallbeck, M. S. (2005). Ergonomic redesign and evaluation of a clamping tool handle. Applied Ergonomics, 36(5), 619–624, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.016
  • Kamboj, S. K., Oldfield, L., Loewenberger, A., Das, R. K., Bisby, J. y Brewin, C. R. (2014). Voluntary and involuntary emotional memory following an analogue traumatic stressor: The differential effects of communality in men and women. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45(4), 421–426, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.05.001
  • Karasek, R. (1985). Job content questionnaire and user’s guide. Lowell: University of Massachusetts.
  • Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P. y Amick, B. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322.
  • Kleiner, M. B. (1998). Macroergonomic analysis of formalization in a dynamic work system. Applied Ergonomics, 29(4), 255–259.
  • Kleiner, M. B. (2006). Macroergonomics: analysis and design of work systems. Applied Ergonomics, 37(1), 81–89.
  • Kleiner, M. B. (2008). Macroergonomics: Work system analysis and design. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 461–467.
  • Li, Q. (2013). A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(5), 1609–1618, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.09.015
  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.
  • Lipscomb, J. A., Trinkoff, A. M., Geiger-Brown, J. y Brady, B. (2002). Work-schedule characteristics and reported musculoskeletal disorders of registered nurses. Scandinavian journal of work, environment y health, 394–401.
  • Maldonado, A., García, J. L., Alvarado, A. y Balderrama, C. O. (2013). A hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design methodology for ergonomic compatibility evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66(1–4), 171–186.
  • Maldonado, A., Sánchez, J., Noriega, S., Díaz, J. J., García, J. L., y Vidal, L. (2009). A hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design survey for ergonomic compatibility evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology –AMT. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the XXIst. Annual International Conference, International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety.
  • Mital, A. y Pennathur, A. (2004). Advanced technologies and humans in manufacturing workplaces: An interdependent relationship. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 33(4), 295–313.
  • Mital, A., Pennathur, A., Huston, R. L., Thompson, D., Pittman, M., Markle, G., et al. (1999). The need for worker training in advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) environments: A white paper. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(2), 173–184.
  • Morel, G., Amalberti, R. y Chauvin, C. (2009). How good micro/macro ergonomics may improve resilience, but not necessarily safety. Safety Science, 47(2), 285–294, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.03.002
  • Morgeson, F.P., y Humphrey, S.E. (2003). Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure of work design. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
  • Morgeson, F. P. y Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321.
  • Morosan, C. y DeFranco, A. (2014). When tradition meets the new technology: An examination of the antecedents of attitudes and intentions to use mobile devices in private clubs. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 42, 126–136, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.06.009
  • Nakata, A., Haratani, T., Takahashi, M., Kawakami, N., Arito, H., Kobayashi, F., et al. (2004). Job stress, social support, and prevalence of insomnia in a population of Japanese daytime workers. Social Science & Medicine, 59(8), 1719–1730.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory:. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nunnally, J.C., y Bernstein, H. (2005). Psychometric theory. México, DF: M.H. Interamericana Ed (en español).
  • Oldham, G. R. y Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.
  • Oyewole, S. A., Haight, J. M. y Freivalds, A. (2010). The ergonomic design of classroom furniture/computer work station for first graders in the elementary school. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40(4), 437–447.
  • Öztürk, N. y Esin, M. N. (2011). Investigation of musculoskeletal symptoms and ergonomic risk factors among female sewing machine operators in Turkey. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(6), 585–591.
  • Pavlovic-Veselinovic, S., Hedge, A. y Veselinovic, M. (2016). An ergonomic expert system for risk assessment of work-related musculo-skeletal disorders. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 53, 130–139, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2015.11.008
  • Pennathur, A. y Mital, A. (2003). Worker mobility and training in advanced manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 32(6), 363–388.
  • Preziosi, R. C. (1980). Organisational Diagnosis Questionnaire (ODQ). The 1980 annual handbook for group facilitators, 112–120.
  • Realyvásquez, A., Maldonado-Macías, A. A., García-Alcaraz, J. L. y Blanco-Fernández, J. (2015). Effects of organizational macroergonomic compatibility elements over manufacturing systems’ performance. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5715–5722.
  • Reinhold, K. y Tint, P. (2015). Lighting of workplaces and health risks. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, 90(2), 11–14.
  • Roberts, G. E. (2003). Employee performance appraisal system participation: A technique that works. Public Personnel Management, 32(1), 89–98.
  • Robertsona, M.M., Huanga, Y.-H., y Leea, J. (2015). Effects of a macroergonomics intervention: Examining the relationship of environmental control. Paper presented at the Proceedings 19th Triennial Congress of the IEA.
  • Schulze, R., Hilger, A.-L. y Engelberg, P. M. (2015). Factor analysis and latent variable models in personality psychology. En J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social y Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 703–708). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Seim, R. y Broberg, O. (2010). Participatory workspace design: A new approach for ergonomists? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40(1), 25–33.
  • Sen, R. N. y Sahu, S. (1996). Ergonomic evaluation of a multipurpose shovel-cum-hoe for manual material handling. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 17(1), 53–58, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00105-7
  • Thompson, C. A. y Prottas, D. J. (2006). Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(1), 100.
  • Trinkoff, A. M., Le, R., Geiger-Brown, J. y Lipscomb, J. (2007). Work schedule, needle use, and needlestick injuries among registered nurses. Work, 28(2), 156–164.
  • Valdez, R., y Zayas-Cabán, T. (2015). Developing hybrid macroergonomic methodologies: a systems foundation for consumer health IT design. Paper presented at the Proceedings 19th Triennial Congress of the IEA.
  • Van der Doef, M. y Maes, S. (1999). The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work & Stress, 13(2), 87–114.
  • Wang, H., Liu, Q. y Tu, Y. (2005). Interpretation of partial least-squares regression models with VARIMAX rotation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 207–219, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2003.12.005
  • Wilson, J. R. (2000). Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Applied Ergonomics, 31(6), 557–567.
  • Wilson, J. R. y Sharples, S. (2015). Evaluation of human work. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
  • Yang, Y. y Rivera, A. J. (2015). An observational study of hands-free communication devices mediated interruption dynamics in a nursing work system. Health Policy and Technology, 4(4), 378–386.
  • Yilmaz, O. y Bayraktar, D. M. (2014). Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of educational technologies and their individual innovativeness categories. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3458–3461, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.783
  • You, H., Kumar, A., Young, R., Veluswamy, P. y Malzahn, D. E. (2005). An ergonomic evaluation of manual Cleco plier designs: Effects of rubber grip, spring recoil, and worksurface angle. Applied Ergonomics, 36(5), 575–583, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.014
  • Zhao, D., McCoy, A. P., Kleiner, B. M., Smith-Jackson, T. L. y Liu, G. (2015). Sociotechnical systems of fatal electrical injuries in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 04015056.
  • Zhu, D. H. y Chang, Y. P. (2014). Investigating consumer attitude and intention toward free trials of technology-based services. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 328–334, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.008
  • Zink, K. J. (2014). Designing sustainable work systems: The need for a systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 126–132.