The DIVIDED SELF metaphorA cognitive-linguistic study of two poems by Nabokov

Referencias bibliográficas

• Bara, B. & Bucciarelli, M. (2005). Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Barreras Gómez, Mª A. (2003). El juego intelectual. Ironía y textualidad en las narraciones breves de Vladimir Nabokov. Logroño: Universidad de La Rioja. Servicios de publicaciones.
• Bergen, K. B. (2005). Mental simulation in literal and figurative language understanding. In S. Coulson & B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczk (Eds.), The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought (pp. 255–280). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Bobrow, J. & Collins, A. (Eds.). Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Academic Press.
• Boyd, B. (1993). Vladimir Nabokov. The Russian Years. Londres: Vintage Edition.
• Bradbury, M. & Ro. S. (1985). Contemporary American Fiction. London: Edward Arnold.
• Calderón Quindos, Mª T. (2005). Blending as a theoretical tool for poetic analysis: Presenting an integracional methodology. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 269–299.
• Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593.
• Clancy. L. (1984). The novels of Vladimir Nabokov. London: Macmillan.
• Dirven, R. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2010). Looking back at 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choinski & L. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in Action (pp. 13–70). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
• Emmott, C. (1997). Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Field, A. (1967). Nabokov: His Life in Art. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
• Field, A. (1987). The Life and Art of Vladimir Nabokov. London: Macdonald Queen Anne Press.
• Fludernik, M. (1993). The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.
• Freeman, M. H. (2006). The fall of the wall between literary studies and linguistics: Cognitive Poetics. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. (pp. 403–428). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Gavins, J. (2005). (Re)thinking modality: A text-world perspective. Journal of literary semantics, 34(2), 79–93.
• Gibbs R. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes 48(8), 529–562.
• Haiman, J. (2008). In defence of iconicity. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 59–66.
• Hamilton, C. (2006). A cognitive rhetoric of poetry and Emily Dickinson. Language and Literature, 15, 381–393.
• Jackson, R. (1981). Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London: Methuen.
• Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Jung, G. (1968). Man and his Symbols. New York: Dell/Laurel.
• Kanevskaya, M. (2003). The semiotic validity of the mirror image in Nabokov’s Despair. In G. Shapiro (Ed.), Nabokov at Cornell. (pp. 20–30). Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
• Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and Emotion. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kövecses, Z. (2011). Methodological issues in conceptual metaphor theory. In S. Handl & H. Schmid (Eds.), Windows to the Mind: Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual Blending (pp. 23–40). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Kressova, N. (2011). Cercanos y distantes: Jorge Luis Borges y Vladimir Nabokov: un estudio comparado. Saarbrücken: Editorial Académica Española.
• Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, G. (1993). The internal structure of the Self. In U. Neisser & D. A. Jopling (Eds.), The Conceptual Self in Context, Culture, Experience and Self Understanding (pp. 92–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lakoff, G. (1996). Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the Self. In G. Fauconnier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp. 91–123). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
• Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2002). Why Cognitive Linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), 245–263.
• Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
• Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Langacker, R. W. (1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Leech, N.G. & Short, M. H. (1995). A Style in Fiction. A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Longman.
• Levin, Y. (1988). Espejo. Semiótica del espejo. Los procedimientos de los sistemas de signos. Tartu: Publicaciones de la universidad de Tartu.
• Nabokov, V. (1970). Poems and Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company
• Nabovok, V. (1990). Strong Opinions. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Neisser, U. & Jopling D. A. (1997). The Conceptual Self in Context, Culture, Experience and Self Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Peña Cervel, S. (2003). Topology and Cognition. München: Lincom Europa.
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (1998). On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 259–274.
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. & Pérez, L. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 161–185.
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive Modeling. A Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In Bobrow, J. & Collins, A. (Eds.), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science (pp. 211–236). New York: Academic Press.
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Semino, E. & Culpeper J. (Eds.) (2002). Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Steiner, G. (1970). Extraterritorial: Papers on Literature and Language Revolution. New Cork: Atheneum.
• Stockwell, M. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
• Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Thorndyke, P. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.
• Toker, Leona. (1989). Nabokov. The Mystery of Literary Structures. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
• Tseng, M. J. & Bergen, B. K. (2005). Lexical processing drives motor simulation. In B. Bara, L. Barsalou & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2206– 2211). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
• Tsur, R. (2002). Some aspects of Cognitive Poetics. In E. Semino & J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis (pp. 279–318). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Turner, M. (1996). The Literary Mind: The Origin of Thought and Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Longman.
• Wójcik-Leese, E. (2010). Cognitive Poetic Readings in Elizabeth Bishop. Portrait of a Mind Thinking. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
• Zaitseva, Yu. (2004). Motiv zerkala v judozhestvennoi sisteme V. Nabokova (na materiale russkoi prozy), Avtoreferat. Perm.