The regularization of Old English weak verbs

  1. Tío Sáenz, Marta 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

ISSN: 1886-2438

Año de publicación: 2015

Número: 10

Páginas: 78-89

Tipo: Artículo

beta Ver similares en nube de resultados
DOI: 10.4995/RLYLA.2015.3583 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This article deals with the regularization of non-standard spellings of the verbal forms extracted from a corpus. It addresses the question of what the limits of regularization are when lemmatizing Old English weak verbs. The purpose of such regularization, also known as normalization, is to carry out lexicological analysis or lexicographical work. The analysis concentrates on weak verbs from the second class and draws on the lexical database of Old English Nerthus, which has incorporated the texts of the Dictionary of Old English Corpus. As regards the question of the limits of normalization, the solution adopted are, in the first place, that when it is necessary to regularize, normalization is restricted to correspondences based on dialectal and diachronic variation and, secondly, that normalization has to be unidirectional.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Atkins, B. T. S. and Rundell, M. (2008). The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bosworth, J. and Toller, T. N. 1973 (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Burkhanov, I. (1998). Lexicography. A Dictionary of basic terminology. Wydawn: Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej w Rzeszowie.
  • Campbell, A. (1987). Old English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark Hall, J. R. 1996 (1896). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • de la Cruz, J. (1982). Iniciación Práctica al Inglés Antiguo. Madrid: Editorial Alhambra.
  • Healey, A. diPaolo (ed.) (2008). The Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form A-G. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.
  • Healey, A. diPaolo (ed.) with J. Price Wilkin and X.Xiang. (2004). The Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto. Available online at http://www.doe.utoronto.ca/pages/pub/web-corpus.html.
  • Hogg, R. M. and Fulk, R. (2011). A grammar of Old English. Volume 2. Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Jackson, H. (2002). Lexicography. An Introduction. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203467282
  • Lass, R. and Anderson, J. (1975). Old English Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2008). "Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology". In R. Van Valin (ed.) Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.12mar
  • Martín Arista, J. (2010a). "OE strong verbs derived from strong verbs". SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 7: 36-56.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2010b). "Lexical negation in Old English". NOWELE (North-Western European Language Evolution), 60/61: 89-108.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2011a). "Projections and Constructions in Functional Morphology. The Case of Old English" HRĒOW. Language and Linguistics, 12/2: 393-425.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2011b). "Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English". English Studies, 92/3: 323-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2011.564776
  • Martín Arista, J. (2011c). "Morphological relatedness and zero alternation in Old English". In P. Guerrero Medina (ed.), Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. Sheffield/Oakville: Equinox. 339-362.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2012a). "Lexical database, derivational map and 3D representation". RESLA-Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, (Extra 1): 119-144.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2012b). "The Old English Prefix ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal". Australian Journal of Linguistics, 32/4: 411-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2012.744264
  • Martín Arista, J. (2012c). "Nerthus. The reference list of Old English strong verbs". Working Papers in Early English Lexicology and Lexicography, 2.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2013a). "Recursivity, derivational depth and the search for Old English lexical primes". Studia Neophilologica, 85/1: 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2013.771829
  • Martín Arista, J. (2013b). "Nerthus. Lexical Database of Old English: From Word-Formation to Meaning Construction". Lecture delivered at the English Linguistics Research Seminar (Centre for Research in Humanities), University of Sheffield.
  • Martín Arista, J. (2014). "Noun layers in Old English. Mismatches and asymmetry in lexical derivation". Nordic Journal of English Studies, 13/3: 160-187.
  • Martín Arista, J., González Torres, E., Maíz Villalta, G., Mateo Mendaza, R., Novo Urraca, C., Vea Escarza, R. and Torre Alonso R. (2011). "Nerthus. A lexical database of Old English. The initial headword list 2007-2009". Working Papers in Early English Lexicology and Lexicography, 1.
  • Martín Arista, J. and Mateo Mendaza, R. (2013). "Nerthus. Outline of a lexicon of Old English". Working Papers in Early English Lexicology and Lexicography, 3.
  • Martín Arista, J. and Cortés Rodríguez, F. (2014). "From directionals to telics: meaning construction, word-formation and grammaticalization in Role and Reference Grammar". In Gómez González, M. Á., F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & F. Gonzálvez García (eds.), Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 229-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.68.10mar
  • Martín Arista, J. and Vea Escarza, R. "Assessing the semantic transparency of Old English affixation: adjective and noun formation". English Studies. Forthcoming.
  • Mitchell, B., Ball, C. and Cameron, A. (1975). "Short titles of Old English texts". Anglo-Saxon England, 4: 207-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263675100002799
  • Mitchell, B. and Robinson, F. (1993). A guide to Old English. Cambridge: Blackwell.
  • Prokosch, E. (1939). A Comparative Germanic Grammar. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
  • Pyles, T. and Algeo, J. (1982). The origins and development of the English language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Ringe, D. (2006). From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. A Linguistic History of English. Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.001.0001
  • Robinson, O. W. (1993). Old English and its closest relatives: a survey of the earliest Germanic languages. London: Routledge.
  • Smith, J. J. (2009). Old English: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812330
  • Stark, D. (1982). The Old English weak verbs. A diachronic and synchronic analysis. Tübingen: Niemeyer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783111357140
  • Sweet, M. (1893). "The Third Class of Weak Verbs in Primitive Teutonic, with Special Reference to Its Development in Anglo-Saxon". The American Journal of Philology, 14/4: 409-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/287733
  • Sweet, H. 1976 (1896). The student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet