A constructional approach to condolences

  1. Campo Martínez, Nuria del 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Journal of English Studies

ISSN: 1576-6357

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 10

Páginas: 7-24

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.18172/JES.178 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of English Studies

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Austin, J.L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bach, K. and R.M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Baicchi, A. and F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2011. “The cognitive grounding of illocutionary constructions within the theoretical perspective of the LexicalConstructional Model”. Textus. English Studies in Italy 23 (3): 543-563.
  • Dik, S.C. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar. The Structure of the Clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Dik, S.C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Givón, T. 1990. Syntax: A Functional Typological Introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Halliday, M.A.K., and C.M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edition. London: Hodder Arnold.
  • Langacker, R.W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
  • Levinson, S.C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Mairal Usón, R. and F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2008. “New challenges for lexical representation within the Lexical-Constructional Model”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57: 137-158.
  • Mairal Usón, R. and F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2009. “Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction”. Deconstructing constructions. Eds. C.S. Butler and J.M. Arista. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 153- 198.
  • Morgan, J. 1978. “Two types of convention in indirect speech acts”. Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. Ed. P. Cole. New York: Academic Press. 261-280.
  • Norrick, N.R. 1978. “Expressive illocutionary acts”. Journal of Pragmatics 2: 277- 291.
  • Panther, K.-U. and L. Thornburg. 1998. “A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 755-769.
  • Panther, K.-U. and L. Thornburg. 1999. “The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian”. Metoynymy in Language and Thought. Eds., K.U. Panther and G. Radden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 333-357.
  • Panther, K.-U. and L. Thornburg. 2004. “The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction”. Metaphorik.de 6: 91-111.
  • Pérez, L. 2001. Illocution and Cognition: A Constructional Approach. Logroño: University of La Rioja.
  • Pérez, L. and F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2002. “Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts”. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (3): 259-284.
  • Pérez, L. and F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2011. “A Lexical Constructional Model account of illocution”. VIAL 8: 99-139.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. 1999. “La ilocución y la gramática”. Nuevas perspectivas en Gramática Funcional. Eds. C. Butler, R. Mairal, J. Martín and F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza. Barcelona: Ariel. 99-171.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. and A. Baicchi. 2007. “Illocutionary constructions: Cognitive motivation and linguistic realization”. Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects. Eds. I. Kecskes and L. Horn. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 95-128.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. and F. Gonzálvez-García. 2011. “Illocutionary meaning revisited: Subjective-transitive constructions in the Lexical-Constructional Model”. Turning Points in the Philosophy of Language and Linguistics. Ed. P. Stalmaszczyk. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang. 65-77.
  • Sadock J. and A. Zwicky. 1985. “Speech act distinctions in Syntax”. Language typology and syntactic description. Ed. T. Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 155-196.
  • Searle, J.R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Thornbug, L. and K.-U. Panther. 1997. “Speech act metonymies”. Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics. Eds. W.R.G. Liebert and L. Waugh. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 205-219.
  • Wierzbicka, A. 1987. English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. New York: Academic Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet