Percepción de las mujeres víctimas de malos tratos sobre la asimetría de poder en la pareja y su relación con la violenciaestudio premilinar

  1. López Megías, Jesús
  2. Montañés Muro, Pilar 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728 1695-2294

Any de publicació: 2012

Volum: 28

Número: 2

Pàgines: 405-416

Tipus: Article

Altres publicacions en: Anales de psicología

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B. y Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sex-ism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125.
  • Alberdi, I. y Matas, N. (2002). La violencia doméstica. Informe sobre los malos tratos a mujeres en España. Barcelona: Fundación «La Caixa».
  • American Psychological Association (1999). Resolution on Male Violence Against Women. Descargado el día 10 de febrero de 2005 de la dirección: htpp://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/maleviol.html.
  • Anderson, D. K. y Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner. An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 4, 163-191.
  • Babcock, J., Waltz, J., Jacobson, J., y Gottman, J. (1993). Power and vio-lence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepan-cies and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40-50.
  • Bell, K. M. y Naugle, A. E. (2008). Intimate partner violence theoretical con-siderations: Moving towards a contextual framework. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1096-1107.
  • Bohner, G. y Lampridis, E. (2004). Expecting to meet a rape victim affects women's self-esteem: The moderating role of rape myth accep-tance. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 77-87.
  • Castro, R., Casique, I. y Brindis, C. (2008). Empowerment and physical vio-lence throughout women's reproductive life in Mexico. Violence Against Women, 14, 655-677.
  • Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1331-1336.
  • Carlson, B. E. (1977). Battered women and their assailants. Social Work, 22, 445-465.
  • Dobash, R. E. y Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Open Books, Shepton Mallet.
  • Durán, M., Moya, M., Megías, J. L. y Viki, T. (2010). Social perception of rape victims in dating and married relationships: the role of perpetra-tor's benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 505-519.
  • Dutton, M. A. (1992). Empowering and healing the battered woman: A model for as-sessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
  • Expósito, F., Herrera, M. C., Moya, M. y Glick, P. (2010). Don't rock the boat: women's benevolent sexism predicts fears of marital violence. Psy-chology of Women Quarterly, 34, 36-42.
  • Expósito, F. y Moya, M (2005). Violencia de género. En F. Expósito y M. Moya (Eds.), Aplicando la psicología social (pp. 201-227). Madrid: Pirámi-de
  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C, y Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological re-search. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
  • Faulk, M. (1974). Men who assault their wives. Medicine, Science and Law, 14, 180-183.
  • Fernández, C. (2004). Violencia contra las mujeres: una visión estructural. Intervención Psicosocial, 13, 155-164.
  • Fischer, A. R. (2006). Women's benevolent sexism as a reaction to hostility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 410-416.
  • Foa, E. B., Cascardi, M., Zoellner, L. A. y Feeny, N. C. (2000). Psychological and environmental factors associated with partner violence. Trauma, Vi-olence and Abuse, 1, 67-91.
  • Fontanil, Y., Méndez-Valdivia, M., Cuesta, M., López, C., Rodríguez, F.J., Herrero, F.J. y Ezama, E. (2002). Mujeres maltratadas por sus parejas masculinas. Psicothema, 14, 130-138.
  • Gayford, J. J. (1975). Wife-battering: a preliminary survey of 100 cases. Brit-ish Medical Journal, 1, 194-197.
  • Gibson-Davis, C., Magnuson, K., Gennetian, L. y Duncan, G. (2005). Em-ployment and the risk of domestic abuse among low-income women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1149-1168.
  • Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713-728.
  • Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C. y Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambiva-lent Sexism and Attitudes Toward Wife Abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292-297.
  • Goode, W. (1971). Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 624-636.
  • Guinote, A. y Vescio, T. (2010). The Social Psychology of Power. New York: Guildford Press.
  • Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262-290.
  • Heise, L. y García-Moreno, C. (2002). Violence by intimate partners. En E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg y J. A. Mercy (Eds.), World Report on Violence and Health (pp. 88-121). Ginebra: World Health Organization.
  • Herrera, M. C. (2005). Asimetría de Poder en las relaciones interpersonales como pre-dictor de la violencia de Género. Trabajo de Investigación Tutelada. Univer-sidad de Granada.
  • Holvoet, N. (2005). Credit and women's group membership in south India: Testing models of intrahousehold allocative behaviour. Feminist Econo-mics, 11, 27-62.
  • Instituto de la Mujer (2006). III Macroencuesta sobre la violencia contra las mujeres. Informe de resultados. Recuperado el 1 de diciembre de 2009 de la direc-ción: http://www.migualdad.es/mujer/mujeres/estud_inves/violencia%20final.pdf.
  • Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Jewkes, R. (2002). Intimate partner violence: Causes and prevention. The Lancet, 359, 1423-1429.
  • Jin, X. y Keat, J. (2010). The effects of change in spousal power on intimate partner violence among chinese inmigrants. Journal of Interpersonal Vio-lence, 25, 610-625.
  • Johnson, M. P., y Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963.
  • Jones, J. H. y Ferguson, B. (2009). Demographic and social predictors of in-timate partner violence in Colombia. A dyadic power perspective. Hu-man Nature, 20, 184-203.
  • Kalmus, D. S. y Straus, M. A. (1982). Wife's marital dependency and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 277-286.
  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., y Anderson, C. (2003). Power, Approach and Inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
  • Krug, E., Dahlberg, L., Mercy, J., Zwi, A. y Lozano, R. (2002). World Report on Violence and Health. World Health Organization: Geneva.
  • Langley, R. y Levy, R. C. (1977). Wife-beating: The silent crisis. New York: Dut-ton.
  • Macmillan, R. y Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: La-bor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 947-958.
  • Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. San Francisco: Blide Publications.
  • Masser, B., Viki, G. T., y Power, C. (2006). Hostile sexism and rape procliv-ity among men. Sex Roles, 54, 565-574.
  • Matud, M. P. (2004). Impacto de la violencia doméstica en la salud de la mu-jer maltratada. Psicothema, 16, 397-401.
  • McCloskey L. A. (1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within the fam-ily. Gender and Society, 10, 449-463.
  • Medina-Ariza, J. y Barberet, R. (2003). Intimate Partner Violence in Spain. Findings From a National Survey. Violence against women, 9, 302-322.
  • Megías, J. L., Romero-Sánchez, M., Durán, M., Moya, M. y Bohner, G. (2011). Spanish validation of the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale (AMMSA). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 912-925.
  • Morales, M. E. (2005). Análisis Psicosocial del Poder en las relaciones de Género. Te-sis Doctoral. Universidad de Granada.
  • Mullender, A. (2000). La violencia doméstica. Una nueva visión de un viejo problema. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Nayak, M. B., Byrne, C. A., Martin, M. K. y Abraham, A. G. (2003). Atti-tudes Toward Violence Against Women: A Cross-Nation Study. Sex Roles, 49, 333-342.
  • Obasaju, M. A., Palin, F. L., Jacobs, C., Anderson, P., y Kaslow, N. J. (2009). Won't you be my neighbor? Using an ecological approach to examine the impact of community on revictimization. Journal of Interpersonal Vio-lence, 24, 38-53.
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) (2005). Estudio multi-país de la OMS sobre salud de la mujer y violencia doméstica. Primeros resultados sobre prevalencia, eventos relativos a la salud y respuestas de las mujeres a dicha violencia. Ginebra: OMS. Recuperado el 1 de diciembre de 2009 de la dirección: ttp://www.who.int/gender/violence/who_multicountry_study/summary_report/chapter1/es/index.html
  • Organización de Naciones Unidas (ONU) (2006). Estudio a fondo sobre todas las formas de violencia contra la mujer (AG 61/122/Add.1). Nueva York: Naciones Unidas. Recuperado el 23/09/2011 de la dirección http://www.eleusis.net/ficheros/documentos/informe%20sec%20gral%20ONU%2010-06%20violencia.pdf.
  • Patró R. y Limiñana, R. M. (2005) Víctimas de violencia familiar: Conse-cuencias psicológicas en hijos de mujeres maltratadas. Anales de psicología, 21 (1), 11-17.
  • Pratto, F. y Walker, A. (2004). The bases of gendered power. En A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall y R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed) (pp. 242-268). Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
  • Pérez, J. A., Páez, D. y Navarro-Pertusa, E. (2001). Conflicto de mentalida-des: cultura del honor frente a liberación de la mujer. Revista Electrónica de Motivación y Emoción, 4, 8-9.
  • Rhatigan, D. L., Street, A. E. y Axsom, D. K. (2006). A critical review of theories to explain violent relationship termination: implications for re-search and intervention. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 321-345.
  • Rocha-Sánchez, T. E. y Díaz-Loving, R. (2005). Cultura de género: La bre-cha ideológica entre hombres y mujeres. Anales de Psicología, 21(1), 42-49.
  • Sagrestano, L. M., Heavy, D. L. y Christensen, A. (1999). Perceived power and physical violence in marital conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 65-79.
  • Sakalli, N. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college stu-dents: the effects of patriarchy, sexism and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44, 599-610.
  • Sánchez-Herrero, S., Sánchez-López, M. P., y Dresch, V. (2009). Hombres y trabajo doméstico: variables demográficas, salud y satisfacción. Anales de Psicología, 25 (2), 299-307.
  • Sidanius, J. y Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. An intergroup theory of social hi-erarchy and oppression. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Buncy-McCoy, S. y Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and prelimi-nary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
  • Tabachnick, B. y Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Thompson, B. (2002). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analisis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Tolman, R. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological mal-treatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (2008). Violence against Women-Facts and Figures. Recuperado el día 1 de diciembre de 2009 de la dirección: http://www.unifem.org/attachments/gender_issues/violence_against_women/facts_figures_violence_against_women_2007.pdf
  • Valor-Segura, I., Expósito, F. y Moya, M. (2011). Victim blaming and exon-eration of the perpetrator in domestic violence: the role of beliefs in a just world and ambivalent sexism. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 195-206.
  • Vescio, T. K., Schlenker, K. A. y Lenes, J. G. (2010). Power and sexism. En A. Guinote y T.K. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 363-380). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Villavicencio, P. y Sebastián, J. (1999). Variables predictoras del ajuste psi-cológico en mujeres maltratadas desde un modelo de estrés. Psicología Conductual, 7, 431-458.
  • Vyas, S. y Watts, C. (2009). How does economic empowerment affect wom-en's risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income coun-tries? A systematic review of published evidence. Journal of International Development, 21, 577-602.
  • Walker, L. E. A. (1999). Psychology and domestic violence around the world. American Psychologist, 54, 21-29.