Towards an Analysis of the Relationship Between Quality Management and Project Management

  1. Gil, Alfonso J. 1
  2. Mataveli, Mara 1
  3. García Alcaraz, Jorge Luis 23
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

  2. 2 Department of Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico
  3. 3 Division of Research and postgraduate Studies, Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico
Libro:
Techniques, Tools and Methodologies Applied to Quality Assurance in Manufacturing

ISBN: 9783030693138

Año de publicación: 2021

Páginas: 119-137

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69314-5_6 GOOGLE SCHOLAR
Repositorio institucional: lockAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

A firm benefits mainly through the success of its projects; therefore, it is important to have the right project management that includes quality management measures. This work aims to examine the relationships between project management and quality management. First, the tools for project management and quality management are studied, and, second, the contents of research on quality management and project management are examined through the database Scopus. Similar features are checked in the quality and project management models. Specific variety is credited in quality research related to project management. Some gaps are found in the literature on quality management related to project management. The most important conclusions are pointed out.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abbas J (2019) Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. J Clean Prod 242:
  • Abbas J (2020) Impact of total quality management on corporate sustainability through the mediating effect of knowledge management. J Clean Prod 244:
  • Alofan F, Chen S, Tan H (2020) National cultural distance, organizational culture, and adaptation of management innovations in foreign subsidiaries: a fuzzy set analysis of TQM implementation in Saudi Arabia. J Bus Res 109:184–199
  • Atkinson R (1999) Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Int J Project Manag 17(6):337–342
  • Bahadorestani A, Naderpajouh N, Sadiq R (2020) Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. J Clean Prod 242:
  • Bamford DR, Greatbanks RW (2005) The use of quality management tools and techniques: a study of application in everyday situations. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 22(4):376–392
  • Basu R (2011) FIT SIGMA: a lean approach to building sustainable quality beyond Six Sigma. Wiley, Chichester, UK
  • Basu R (2014) Managing quality in projects: an empirical study. Int J Project Manag 32:178–187
  • Chofreh AG, Goni FA, Ismail S, Shaharoun AM, Klemes JJ, Zeinalnezhad M (2016) A master plan for the implementation of sustainable enterprise resource planning systems (Part I): concept and methodology. J Clean Prod 136(Part B):176–182
  • Cotrim SL, Filho DAM, Leal GCL, Galdamez EVC (2018) Implementation of cleaner production along with quality management tools. Int J Technol Manag Sustain Dev 17(1):65–85
  • Cropanzano R, Walumbwa FO (2010) Moral leadership: a short primer of competing perspectives. In: Schminke M (ed) Managerial ethics: managing the psychology of morality. Psychology Press/Routledge/Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 21–52
  • DeCarlo D (2004) eXtreme project management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
  • Deming WE (1994) Out of the crisis. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
  • Demirkesen S, Ozorhon B (2017) Impact of integration management on construction project management performance. Int J Project Manag 35:1639–1654
  • Di Maddaloni F, Davis K (2017) The influence of local community stakeholders in megaprojects: rethinking their inclusiveness to improve project performance. Int J Project Manag 35(8):1537–1556
  • Djendel M, Allaoui O, Bouzid A (2016) Effect of air plasma spraying parameters on the quality of coating. Int J Comput Exp Sci Eng 2(2):1–5
  • Dvir D (2005) Transferring projects to their final users: the effect of planning and preparations for commissioning on project success. Int J Project Manag 23(4):257–265
  • Eskerod P, Huemann M (2014) Managing for stakeholders. In: Turner R (ed) Gower handbook of project management. Aldershot, England, Gower, pp 217–232
  • Fernandez D, Fernandez J (2008) Agile Project Management—Agilism versus traditional approaches. J Comput Inf Syst 49(2):10–17
  • Fonseca LM (2015) From Quality gurus and TQM to ISO 9001:2015: a review of several quality paths. Int J Qual Res 9:167–180
  • Francisco de Oliveira G, Rabechini R Jr (2019) Stakeholder management influence on trust in a project: a quantitative study. Int J Project Manag 37:131–144
  • Gemuenden HG (2015) Success factors of global new product development programs, the definition of project success, knowledge sharing, and special issues of Project Management Journal. Proj Manag J 46(1):1–9.
  • Gil AJ, Mataveli M (2018) Project management and learning: the learning project. In: Otero-Mateo M (ed) Human capital and competences in project management. Intechopen, London, pp 45–69
  • Golini R, Landoni P (2014) International development projects by non-governmental organizations: an evaluation of the need for specific project management and appraisaltools. Impact Assess Project Apprais 32(2):121–135
  • Hernandez DJD, Aspinwall E (2007) Improvement methods in UK and Mexican construction industries: a comparison. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(1):59–70
  • Ladewski BJ, Al-Bayati AJ (2019) Quality and safety management practices: the theory of quality management approach. J Saf Res 69:193–200
  • Lehtinen J, Aaltonen K (2020) Organizing external stakeholder engagement in inter-organizational projects: opening the black box. Int J Project Manag 38:85–98
  • Levine DI, Toffel MW (2010) Quality management and job quality: how the ISO 9001 standard for quality management systems affects employees and employers. Manag Sci 56:978–996
  • Liu J (2016) Research on the production quality risk management of the assembly type building products: taking Jinan as an example. Constr Econ 37(11):114–117
  • Ma Y, Zhang Q, Yin H (2020) Environmental management and labor productivity: the moderating role of quality management. J Environ Manag 255:
  • Momeni MA, Yaghoub S, Aliha MMR (2019) An optimal control model for analyzing quality investment in the project management. Comput Ind Eng 129:529–544
  • Meredith JR, Mantel SJ (2003) Project management. Wiley, NJ, USA
  • Nair A (2006) Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance—implications for quality management theory development. J Oper Manag 24(6):948–975
  • Nicał A, Anysz H (2020) The quality management in precast concrete production and delivery processes supported by association analysis. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:577–590
  • Note M (2015) Project management for information professionals. Chandos Publishing, Langford Lane, UK
  • Ooi KB (2014) TQM: a facilitator to enhance knowledge management? A structural analysis. Expert Syst Appl 41:5167–5179
  • Peng X, Prybutok V, Xie H (2020) Integration of supply chain management and quality management within a quality focused organizational framework. Int J Prod Res 58(2):448–466
  • Picciotto R (2019) Towards a ‘New Project Management’ movement? An international development perspective. Int J Project Manag (in press)
  • Rowlinson S, Cheung YKF (2008) Stakeholder management through empowerment: modeling project success. Constr Manag Econ 26(6):611–623
  • Scaringella L, Burtschell F (2017) The challenges of radical innovation in Iran: Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity highlights—evidence from a joint venture in the construction sector. Technol Forecast Soc Change 122:151–169
  • Scopus (2020) Document search. https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic
  • Shenhar A (2008) Unleashing the power of project management. Ind Manag 50(1):1–7
  • Sila I (2007) Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance through the lens of organizational theories: an empirical study. J Oper Manag 25:83–109
  • Singh PJ, Power D, Chuong SC (2011) A resource dependence theory perspective of ISO 9000 in managing organizational environment. J Oper Manag 29(1–2):49–64
  • Spundak M (2014) Mixed agile/traditional project management methodology—reality or illusion? Procedia Soc Behav Sci 119:939–948
  • Turner R, Huemann M (2002) Managing quality. In: Turner R, Simister S (eds) Gower handbook of project management. Gower Publishing, Brookfield, VT, pp 315–332
  • Turner R, Zolin R (2012) Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Manag J 43:87–99
  • Verga Matos P, Romao M, Miranda Sarmento J, Abaladas A (2019) The adoption of project management methodologies and tools by NGDOs: a mixed methods perspective. J Bus Res 101:651–659
  • Walaszczyk A, Polak-Sopinska A (2020) The role of leadership in organizations managed in conformity with ISO 9001 Quality Management System Standard. In: Kantola JI, Nazir S (eds) Advances in human factors, business management and leadership. Springer, Switzerland, pp 402–491
  • Williams P, Ashill NJ, Naumann E, Jackson E (2015) Relationship quality and satisfaction: customer-perceived success factors for on-time projects. Int J Project Manag 33:1836–1850
  • Winch GM (2004) Managing project stakeholders. In: Morris PWG, Pinto JK (eds) The Wiley guide to managing projects. Wiley, New York, pp 321–339
  • Wysocki RK (2014) Effective project management: traditional, agile, extreme, 7th edn. Wiley, Indianapolis
  • Yu GJ, Park M, Hong KH (2020) A strategy perspective on total quality management. Total Qual Manag Business Excell 31(1–2):68–81
  • Zhou X, Lee CY (2000) Quality management and manufacturing strategies in China. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 17(8):876–899