How an idea germinates into a projext or the intransitive resultative construction with Entity-Specific change-of-state verbs

  1. Rosca, Andreea
Revista:
Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

ISSN: 1886-2438

Año de publicación: 2014

Número: 9

Páginas: 97-105

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4995/RLYLA.2014.1451 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Resumen

This study discusses how seven of Levin�s (1993) entity-specific change-of-state verbs (i.e. bloom, blossom, flower, germinate, sprout, swell, and blister) are subsumed into the intransitive resultative construction by highlighting and making use of the external and internal constraints proposed by the Lexical Constructional Model (LCM; Ruiz de Mendoza and Mairal 2007). External constraints refer to cognitive mechanisms, such as high-level metaphor and/or metonymy whereas internal constraints are concerned with the encyclopedic and event structure makeup of verbs. The Internal Variable Conditioning constraint is at work when the information encapsulated by a predicate determines the choice of the Z element in an intransitive resultative construction. The semantic makeup of the verb swell and the entity undergoing swelling constrain the nature of the resultant entity Z which must be bigger in size or have a bigger value than the Y element (e.g. The work, which was originally meant to consist only of a few sheets, swelled into ten volumes).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Boas, H. C. (2008). "Resolving Form-Meaning Discrepancies in Construction Grammar", in J. Leino (ed.) Constructional reorganization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 11-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cal.5.02boa
  • Broccias, C. (2004). "The Cognitive Basis of Adjectival and Adverbial Resultative Constructions". Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2, 103-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/arcl.2.04bro
  • Fodor, J. A. (1970). "Three Reasons for Not Deriving Kill from Cause to Die". Linguistic Inquiry 1, 429-438.
  • Goldberg, A. (1991). "It can't go down the chimney up: Paths and the English Resultative", in L. A. Sutton, C. Johnson and R. Shields (eds.) Proceedings of the seventeeth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, California: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 368-378.
  • Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Haiman, J. (1980). "Dictionaries and Encyclopedias". Lingua 50, 329-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(80)90089-3
  • Iwata, S. (2005). "The Role of Verb Meaning in Locative Alternations", in M. Fried and H. C. Boas (eds.) Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 101-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cal.4.07iwa
  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
  • Lakoff, G. and M. Turner (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
  • Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Luzondo, A. (2011). English resultative constructions in the Lexical Constructional Model: implications for constructional modelling within a lexical conceptual knowledge base. Doctoral dissertation, University of La Rioja.
  • Mairal, R. and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (2009). "Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction", in C. S. Butler and J. Martín Arista (eds.) Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 153-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.107.08lev
  • Mairal, R. and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (2008). "New challenges for lexical representation within the Lexical-Constructional Model". Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57, 137-158.
  • Nemoto, N. (2005). "Verbal Polysemy and Frame Semantics in Construction Grammar: Some observations on the locative alternation", in M. Fried and H. C. Boas (eds.) Grammatical Constructions – Back to the Roots. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 119-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cal.4.08nem
  • Östman, J.-O. and M. Fried (2004). "Historical and intellectual background of Construction grammar", in M. Fried and J.-O. Östman (eds.) Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cal.2.01ost
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2013). "Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model", in Elke Diedrichsen and Brian Nolan (eds.) Linking constructions into functional linguistics: The role of constructions in RRG grammars (Studies in Language Series). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins; vol. in prep.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2011). "Metonymy and cognitive operations", in R. Benczes, A. Barcelona and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (eds.) Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 103-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.06rui
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2008). "Cross-linguistic analysis, second language teaching and cognitive semantics: the case of Spanish diminutives and reflexive constructions", in S. De Knop and T. De Rycker (eds.) Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 121-152.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and A. Luzondo (2013). "Lexical-constructional subsumption in resultative constructions in English", in M. Brdar, M. Zic, I. Raffaelli, M.-M. Stanojevic and N. Tudjman Vukovic (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics. Between Universality and Variation. Cambridge Scholars Publishing; vol. in prep.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and R. Mairal (2011). "Constraints on syntactic alternation: lexical-constructional subsumption in the Lexical-Constructional Model", in P. Guerrero (ed.) Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London, UK/Oakville, CT: Equinox, 62-82.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and R. Mairal (2008). "Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model". Folia Linguistica 42(2), 355-400.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and F. Santibá-ez (2003). "Content and formal cognitive operations in construing meaning". Italian Journal of Linguistics 15, 293-320.
  • Van Valin, R. (2005). The syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface: an introduction to Role and Reference Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578
  • Wright, S. K. (2002). "Transitivity and Change of State Verbs", in J. Larson and M. Paster (eds.) Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, California: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 339-350.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet